Iran And The Bomb Argument Essay

Improved Essays
Show More
These two articles both have substantial points for aggressive arguments for Iran acquiring nuclear weapons and why Iran should not. “Iran and the Bomb” takes an approach against Iran having nuclear power. Kahl argues that this could be a threat for other states, while on the other side, Waltz debates that this could create stability for Iran and the Middle East.
I agree with Kahl’s article, “Iran and the Bomb” because I also believe that theorists, Kenneth Waltz, is respectfully wrong in a sense that the Islamic Republic would become more responsible as an international actor if it crossed the nuclear threshold (CITE). In fact, Iran could be somewhat dissuaded from purposely using nuclear weapons themselves or giving devices to terrorists, …show more content…
1 CITE WHY IRAN). It could mean the complete opposite. In addition, Iran shows retaliation against the United States, Israel and other states by supporting terrorist groups and militants throughout the Middle East (CITE). This definitely makes Iran questionable with their intentions because the state is already nervous about being undermined from others. The Iranian government appears to support the use of nuclear weapons in order to pressure and intimidate other states, which is not a responsible way to use such an intense weapon. Since this weaponry has the ability to increase violent terrorist attacks, it is vital for states to be aware and take caution when dealing with Iran now. Even though already true, it seems risky and terrifying that Iran has the same nuclear power as the United States (CITE pg. 3)
The book Hiroshima is a strong influencer when comparing these articles’ facts and opinions because everything was put in perspective in this book. The outcome of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was realistically described, making the event relate to any audience. The TYPEatomic bombs devastating long-term effects on the people of Hiroshima makes the thought of any country with this type of weaponry power seem

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Argical Analysis Of Eric Schlosser Today's Nuclear Weapons
    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argical Analysis Of Eric Schlosser Today's Nuclear Weapons

    Also nuclear weapons cannot differentiate between military targets and civilians it violates the Geneva Conventions, which protect civilians. The author than talks about how the International Campaign to Ban Nuclear Weapons has convinced many countries to seek abolition of nuclear weapons and how the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons have been steps in the right direction. The last point of the article is about how to undo the knowledge to create nuclear bombs. Schlosser believes that the knowledge to create these weapons can be forgotten because as time passes and when there is no nuclear testing, people will forget as they become less…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Interventionist Foreign Policy
    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Interventionist Foreign Policy

    Because deterrence best enforced through “coordinated multilateral pressure and tough economic sanctions,” nuclear proliferation can be discouraged without military occupation, which heightens tensions and drives nuclear development as a method of neutralizing American advantages (Mearsheimer and Walt 79; Posen 120). Although there is the possibility that some vulnerable states may seek nuclear weapons to bolster their security, it is likely to be a costly and ineffective endeavor with few actual implications in the international system (Mearsheimer and Walt 79). Offshore balancing is ultimately the better alternative to fighting “preventive conventional warfare against nascent nuclear powers,” which could quickly escalate into a second Cold War or even unintentional nuclear warfare itself (Posen…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Security
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Security

    If one state were to rely on another for its security and defense, that state would not be sovereign and autonomous, but dependent upon the protector state. However, in order for states to maintain their sovereignty and autonomy, as well as achieve security, they strive to reach nuclear capability. Nuclear capability is an attractive trait to states because it is the ultimate tool in the arsenal of deterrence. Although there is no way to effective way to prevent a state from achieving nuclear capability, it is still pursed. For instance, the United States is in the mist of preventing Iran from reaching nuclear capability.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Iran Deal
    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Iran Deal

    Although there are many critics that oppose President Obama’s Iran Deal, I personally support it. The deal offers a just compromise to both the United States and Iran by obstructing “Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons in exchange for relief from crippling economic sanctions” (The Week). Some disputants of the deal claim that Iran could still easily get their hands on nuclear weapons, but Aaron Stein, a nuclear nonproliferation expert, says that “the likelihood of [Iran] getting caught [if they ‘cheat’] is near 100 percent” (The Week). The deal has no true consequences other than the narrow risk that Iran will violate it. The former president of UANI (United Against Nuclear Iran), Gary Samore, went to the extent of saying: “If I knew…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Iran Informative Speech
    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Iran Informative Speech

    What do we really know about Iran? Speaking for myself, hardly anything at all. So how is it that I have came to the assumption that this country, and these people, are all dangerous, terroristic, and a threat to society? There are many misconceptions Westerners have of middle eastern people, Iranians in particular. Conclusions are made about these foreigners with limited or unreliable evidence to support them.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb
    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of David Farber's Taken Hostage Crisis
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of David Farber's Taken Hostage Crisis

    This “Cold War policy” would soon play a large role in the crisis between the United States and radical Islam. Rather than viewing the unfolding catastrophe as the United State’s first entanglement with radical Islam, Cold War policy shaped the response the United States had to the crisis by American policymakers viewing Iran through a Cold War paradigm, seeing “Soviet Red and not Islamic Green” as Farber states (Farber 5). As an initial containment strategy to stop the spread of communism, the United States government appointed the Shah of Iran in 1953. Tensions started rising as Iranians saw the United States as playing a large role in determining Iran’s future. Farber states “the Shah’s growing number of opponents believed that the United States continued to play a fundamental role in maintaining the Shah in power and in determining Iran’s destiny” (Farber 37).…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Iran Nuclear Program Essay
    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Iran Nuclear Program Essay

    Iran’s nuclear program was not always seen as a controversial aspect of Iran’s domestic policy. As a matter of fact, the origins of the Iranian program began in the 1950’s with the support of the United States. Research and development of a nuclear program began once Tehran joined Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace initiative and signed treaty No.4898. On December 8, 1953 during the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly the Atoms for Peace Program was launched by Eisenhower. International dynamics set by the Cold War provided an incentive for American scientists to “allow all peoples of all nations to see that…the great Powers of the earth, both of the East and of the West, are interested in human aspirations first rather than in building up the…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Weapon Debate
    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nuclear Weapon Debate

    In February 13, 2009 they have such a long debate which President Barack Obama “referred to the need to reduce the force structure of our strategic military systems by cutting the number of deployed nuclear weapons”. In this debate he spoke about why we should reduce our nuclear weapon and what it will be cause of reducing it. He also mentions that military civilian leaders have make plan to reduce nuclear weapons, the main question is what if United State reduce nuclear weapon and what will be consequences for nuclear weapon reduce. In the book of “Spread of Nuclear weapon” Scott D. Sagan also said that we should worry if United State have more nuclear weapon and the reason he give is “The two superpower maintained a long peace throughout…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Argumentative Essay
    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Iran's Nuclear Argumentative Essay

    Nuclear energy yields multiple uses. Obviously, it can be used for destruction and warfare in the form of a bomb. However, it is also used for technological advancements in agriculture and food, power and electricity, medical treatment, and so on. Of late, controversy has erupted over the decade plus long debate of the nuclear aptitudes and capacities of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The recent hopes of multiple countries have been to deal with this matter by achieving what is known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which has been discussed between Iran and six major countries including the U.S., the U.K., China, Germany, France, and Russia.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    You And The Atomic Bomb George Orwell Analysis
    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages

    You And The Atomic Bomb George Orwell Analysis

    “You and The Atomic Bomb” They say, I say George Orwell, an English novelist and essayist, wrote “You and The Atomic Bomb” on October 19, 1945. Roughly about 2 months before this essay, bombs were dropped over Hiroshima not only letting the world know who has power and who doesn’t, but also leading individuals to be oppressed. With the discovery of the atomic bomb, and the difficulty and cost of developing it, the world will simply continue on a path of destruction and will eventually separate into dominating powers. It has been common to dismiss the danger of weapons, especially if it doesn’t directly affect you. The American society doesn’t take into consideration the danger of developing new weapons because, as they say, it is not them who fear it, it is them who use it as a threat.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How To Prevent Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay
    • 1524 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How To Prevent Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay

    Since the waning years of World War II, the various nations of the world have put a lot of time, energy, and resources in to developing nuclear arsenals for preventive reasons. But is that really always why they acquire them? I would say yes, but not to prevent the same things. There are a few different reasons why nuclear weapons have been developed in the past by various existing nuclear powers, and this has varied from preventing invasions to preventing loss of life in their own invasions, among other reasons. The United States was the first to develop nuclear weapons at a time when it could defend itself from its rivals if need be, but it could be argued that the weapons that were developed allowed the United States to end the war with…

    • 1524 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Saudi Arabia Stability
    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Saudi Arabia Stability

    Saudi Arabia, the Key to Middle East Stability The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s role as the key to Middle East stability is becoming more important in the current world climate, more specifically the United States Central Command Area of Operations. General regional instability of the Middle East, religious conflicts, and Iranian hegemonic intentions add to obstacles for Saudi Arabia to overcome. These issues also undermine United States’ interests to bring peace to the region. Saudi Arabia’s primary religion is Muslim. This is further broken down into Sunni and Shia, with Sunni taking the majority of 85-95% of the population and Shia encompassing another 10-15%.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Iran Culture
    • 1357 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Iran Culture

    Allegations of Iran sponsoring terrorism caused the U.S. to enforce extensive trade sanctions on the country. Along with the previously mentioned allegations, Iran’s nuclear programs made the country a target of more trade sanctions. Iran has received international objections over its nuclear program. Iran, however, stands strong that the nuclear program is peaceful in nature and will not discontinue enriching uranium (Iran in perspective,…

    • 1357 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings