The Founding Fathers of this country wrote the Constitution on the basis of liberty, equality, and individual perseverance. They opposed a government which took away it’s citizens natural right, and instead wanted to base a new country on the opportunity and freedom of the new world, not the oppression and corruption of Europe at the time. Today, however, we find our government with a different agenda, one that profits their respective political party, and undermines the rights given to us by those who turned against unfair treatment of a government. This is seen by the treatment of minors in schools and the accused surveillance by the NSA.
Many times adults overlook teeenagers as inferior or ignorant in what happens around them, and feel it …show more content…
After the 9/11 attack, America tightened down on security and started to monitor calls, today the NSA and the Obama administration is accused of unconstitutionally monitoring people's calls, and tracking people who they believed to be associated with terrorists. These actions have been greatly scrutinized and debated by the public, what justifications can you give for the surveillance of citizens before the act becomes unconstitutional, and to what end? The answer lies within your own ideologies, if you believe an invasion of privacy is necessary in rendering terrorists cells inoperable, or if you believe there should be a fine line between what the government should and shouldn’t be able to watch, or somewhere in the middle, no answer is wrong, but justified in different ways. Like the calls which many say are inappropriate, privacy is facing another challenge every time you decide to fly. As to prevent as many attacks as possible, airport security thoroughly searches each person’s bag, and sometimes takes individuals for another, more intrusive, screening. This process is considered by many to be an invasion of the public’s privacy and in many times unconstitutional due to the lack of regard for the person in question and their
Many times adults overlook teeenagers as inferior or ignorant in what happens around them, and feel it …show more content…
After the 9/11 attack, America tightened down on security and started to monitor calls, today the NSA and the Obama administration is accused of unconstitutionally monitoring people's calls, and tracking people who they believed to be associated with terrorists. These actions have been greatly scrutinized and debated by the public, what justifications can you give for the surveillance of citizens before the act becomes unconstitutional, and to what end? The answer lies within your own ideologies, if you believe an invasion of privacy is necessary in rendering terrorists cells inoperable, or if you believe there should be a fine line between what the government should and shouldn’t be able to watch, or somewhere in the middle, no answer is wrong, but justified in different ways. Like the calls which many say are inappropriate, privacy is facing another challenge every time you decide to fly. As to prevent as many attacks as possible, airport security thoroughly searches each person’s bag, and sometimes takes individuals for another, more intrusive, screening. This process is considered by many to be an invasion of the public’s privacy and in many times unconstitutional due to the lack of regard for the person in question and their