The introduction to this rhetorical analysis does in fact reflect the outline given. It states the broader topic ‘s significance and proceeds to reduce itself down to support his general thesis of the essay. The author does however, assert a claim that he does not seem to be supported anywhere in his rhetorical analysis when he states “Seattle has a valid reason to be angry at the white people for the way they have treated his tribe.”(par. 1). While I understand what the author was trying to achieve with the statement, it could have either been omitted completely or worded differently to help support his claims much better. By using this sentence, the author reduces the credibility of his own analysis by not appearing un biased and objective.
