At the end of Phase I, samples are individually asked to address the challenge, “people don’t value the works of child care workers” by writing her/his idea within a specified time frame, say 60 minutes. A format that will be used for asking samples to address the challenge is illustrated as Appendix 9. A panel of experts (at least of three members) of the context of this study then evaluates each reply, and decides which replies are to be considered innovative. Based on the evaluation, samples are to be divided into two groups: (a) innovative or controlled group; and (b) non-innovative or experiment group.
6.30 Phase III: Experimentation Phase III consists of four different activities, such as: (a) comparison; (b) intervention; (c) exploration; …show more content…
The major differences in the characteristics of two groups (controlled and experiment groups) help determining the nature and level of psychological interventions required for the non-innovative group to behave and perform in the similar way that the innovative group does for bringing innovation.
(b) Intervention: The primary purpose of intervention is to bring changes in individuals’ approaches to address the challenge. It is beyond the scope of the proposed intervention to make any attempt to change individual’s personality. However, it is expected that the proposed intervention may contribute helping samples to cope the situational effects the way innovative group does.
Therefore, intervention will be limited within group level activities focusing on issues, such as: (i) beliefs and understanding; (ii) need identification; (iii) 3600 purview; (iv) fun-type activities related to the challenge; and (v) individuals’ level of spontaneity. However, the details of intervention can only be finalized after required comparison of the data received from the Phase I of this …show more content…
However, it can be assumed that the opinions and insights of child care workers may contain contextual biases. In order to overcome such biases, this study, at this level, employs Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to collect opinion and insights of people irrespective of people’s age, gender, educational qualifications, profession, culture etc. The qualitative data related to the meaning of innovation and the process of innovation as collected using the above-mentioned sources offer a strong theoretical and conceptual base to evaluate the existing literature of innovation. Through this process, a pragmatic and acceptable understanding of innovation and the process of innovation can be
6.30 Phase III: Experimentation Phase III consists of four different activities, such as: (a) comparison; (b) intervention; (c) exploration; …show more content…
The major differences in the characteristics of two groups (controlled and experiment groups) help determining the nature and level of psychological interventions required for the non-innovative group to behave and perform in the similar way that the innovative group does for bringing innovation.
(b) Intervention: The primary purpose of intervention is to bring changes in individuals’ approaches to address the challenge. It is beyond the scope of the proposed intervention to make any attempt to change individual’s personality. However, it is expected that the proposed intervention may contribute helping samples to cope the situational effects the way innovative group does.
Therefore, intervention will be limited within group level activities focusing on issues, such as: (i) beliefs and understanding; (ii) need identification; (iii) 3600 purview; (iv) fun-type activities related to the challenge; and (v) individuals’ level of spontaneity. However, the details of intervention can only be finalized after required comparison of the data received from the Phase I of this …show more content…
However, it can be assumed that the opinions and insights of child care workers may contain contextual biases. In order to overcome such biases, this study, at this level, employs Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to collect opinion and insights of people irrespective of people’s age, gender, educational qualifications, profession, culture etc. The qualitative data related to the meaning of innovation and the process of innovation as collected using the above-mentioned sources offer a strong theoretical and conceptual base to evaluate the existing literature of innovation. Through this process, a pragmatic and acceptable understanding of innovation and the process of innovation can be