Intertextual References In Into The Wild

Improved Essays
Jon Krakauer's use of his own personal experiences, intertextual references, and McCandless journal entries to piece together McCandless motive for going into the wild and therefore, defending McCandless decisions. Jon Krakauer's purpose for writing Into the Wild was to explain exactly what happened to Chris McCandless and what led Chris to go into the wild. Jon Krakauer connects himself with the subject of identity throughout the novel by comparing his personal experiences with Chris McCandless.

Throughout the novel, Jon Krakauer refers to his own personal experiences when he attempted to hike the Devils Thumb when he was McCandless age. In The Body Out There, written by Daniel Lehman, Jon Krakauer states, "I do so in the hope that my experience
…show more content…
In the novel, Krakauer mentions authors such as Jack London, Mark Twain, and Herman Melville, who are all American novelists in 1800, which were mentioned by McCandless in various journal entries. Wyatt Merkley states in, Literary Amplification; Jon Krakauer's Use of Intertextual References in Into the Wild and Their Role in The McCandless Phenomenon, "Krakauer's depiction of McCandless in Into the Wild, encourages these kinds of comparisons and frequently makes intertextual references to the works of famous authors...". These authors quotes mentioned in the journal entries are said to be an insight into McCandless level of education. Many reporters insulted McCandless by referring him to a lunatic and crazy because of his decisions and his interpretation of the world. Jon Krakauer uses intertextual references to prove McCandless was an intelligent individual and how the various authors helped McCandless make his own philosophy of society which is criticized by …show more content…
Jon Krakauer connects himself with the subject, which in this case is the death of Chris McCandless, to reconnect with his identity. Jon defends Chris because of their similarities. Jon understands McCandless point of view very clearly and interpretants every decision McCandless has made and every journal entry he's written. With this, Krakauer is able to give Chris McCandless justice and prove his death wasn’t a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the book, “Into The Wild,” by Jon Krakauer, Jon trailed Chris McCandless from the warm and civilized East Coast, to the bitterly cold Alaskan wilderness, Jon followed through his footsteps in hopes of understanding, and to relate to the walking paradox that was Chris McCandless Come back to this. Jon Krakauer thought that Chris McCandless was kindred spirit, Jon Krakauer related to Chris on many different fronts, such as tensed family issues, a similarly adventurous soul, and that they had similar ways of thinking. However, only Chris followed through with his thinking with action. To begin, Jon Krakauer related to McCandless on many different fronts, one of which being that both Chris and Jon had struggling family relationships. While Jon Krakauer was ruefully recounting his similar adventures he reconciles his attitude and thoughts on McCandless he said, “I believe we were similarly affected by the skewed relationships we had with our fathers.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the chapter’s beginning, he shares the Alaskan locals’ opinions. Many mark Chris as one more “kook” (71) but “McCandless ended up dead, with the story of his dumbassedness splashed across the media” (71). Krakauer’s inclusion of the opinions makes the tone of the chapter serious yet scrutinizing. The tone extends insight into why Chris left and was compelled to Alaska. But at the end of the chapter Krakauer sets Chris apart from the others.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay is going to be a argumentative essay about krakauer opinion of Chris McCandless. Krakauer mood changes throughout the book/story about how he feels about Chris he says a lot of stuff that he might disagrees and sometimes he agrees with him about it. Krakauer talk a lot of Chris because of the choices he made during the story and how he lived and how he tried to survive in the wild. I will also be talking about how he connects and the opposite of what he says about Chris McCandless. Krakauer didn't like Chris decisions about going in the wild because he was going to die there without any food or any place to stay or sleep or rest.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people have different opinions of why Jon Krakauer wrote a book about a man that he has no relation to. In the book, Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, Chris McCandless hitchhiked to Alaska and walked alone into the wild after giving up all his belongings to start his new life. Krakauer’s purpose for writing this book is to further explain Chris McCandless’s motive for his adventures in a way that the readers will understand it. Krakauer wants his readers to understand Chris’s motives as if he was not insane and had a reason for doing what he did. He gives stories from others who have gone into the wild, epigraphs at the beginning of each chapter, eyewitness testimony, letters from Chris and many other things to help understand Chris’s motive,…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted a purpose in life and that was something he hadn’t found yet. Going into the wild Chris did not know what was going to happen and that is exactly what he wanted. He wanted to live off the wild and experience a life different from his structured life. Chris felt that if he did this for himself, and survived, he would come out being a much better person. Krakauer wanted to try to explain McCandless’ intentions of going into the wild.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Krakauer may have been influenced by his own life and the ways he saw it as similar to Chris’s. He even warns the reader that he is biased,…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Into the Wild, John Krakauer uses connotative diction that reveals his sympathetic bias towards Chris McCandless. With efforts to justify that Chris’s desire to follow his own plan in life was not strange, he explains that “it is hardly unusual for” man “to be drawn to a pursuit considered reckless” by elders (182). In addition, John describes danger as holding a “certain allure” which hints that the adventure that Chris longed for came from natural desires to obtain it (182). Chris had the same lofty dreams that every teenager has, and John makes Chris seem relatable through diction. However, by describing others who venture out to the Alaskan frontier as “marginal characters”, John points out that Chris is unlike the other people who go…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the novel, Into the Wild, the author, Jon Krakauer attempts to remain unbiased, but reveals himself as positively biased toward Chris McCandless. Krakauer illustrates the journey McCandless goes through as he spontaneously abandons his life as a well-off college student to hitchhike to Alaska. After McCandless’s body was found, many people believe that he was naive and wasted his life; however, Krakauer does not. To demonstrate this, Krakauer compares his younger self to McCandless, views McCandless as a intelligent, unique individual and applauds McCandless’ reason behind his journey. When exploring McCandless’ background life, Krakauer explicitly points out similarities between himself and McCandless, seeing part of himself in McCandless.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis For Into The Wild

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    hook…mention something about into the wild………. Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer is an extension of an article first published in Outside magazine. Krakauer goes to further explain the journey of Chris McCandless, while providing his own insight to provide the reader a better understanding of the McCandless reasoning. Chris lived a nomadic life after he graduated from college, traveling from South Dakota to Mexico. However,his two year journey proved fatal when he took a trip to Alaska, his greatest undertaking.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since readers have strong parallels between Krakauer and McCandless, readers can trust Krakauer’s argument that McCandless’ death was the product of being an under-prepared, adventurous youth. Through the use of ethos, Krakauer gives a reliable figure to parallel the life of McCandless’ off…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Krakauer made the catastrophic error of writing the book from a very biased point of view, therefore clouding the overall message of the novel. Krakauer was very wrong with his opinion of Chris, because of his bias towards outdoorsmen like him. Chris McCandless is much more of an inconsiderate fool because even though he was following his “dreams,” in reality he was just a dumb kid who wanted to escape from a loving and caring family that he wanted nothing to do with. Peter Christian was right in saying that kids like Chris aren’t heroes by any means, but the rescue teams that save these kids are. Chris’ inner drive and stubbornness was his real problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jon Krakauer wrote Into the Wild to capture Chris McCandless’s dream of freedom in the wilderness. In his book, Krakauer tells about Chris McCandless and his life of adventure. Believing he was living a dull life, Chris wanted to go out into the word and experience what nature had to offer. Chris McCandless walked into happiness in that he liberated himself from emotionally charged human interaction; he was finally free, and he was able to experience adventure through the wild. Even though he walked in happiness, he was walking away from misery in the fact that he was leaving all of his troubles behind; however Chris was ultimately walking into happiness considering that the wilderness and adventure truly made him happy.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Regret or Meaning In the novel Into The Wild by John Krakauer, published in 1996 the protagonist Chris McCandless (Alexander Supertramp) discovers his own meaning of life, or his sense of truth of the world. Told in the narrative of Krakauer, he addresses the theme by describing the setting of Chris’s life, establishing his main conflict of not having the right supplies, money, food, knowledge for his trip, and incorporating the literary devices, such as irony, to establish Chris’s unique personality, along with characterization, that give details about Chris’s lifestyle and his choices that affect his journey. Krakauer’s purpose is to give life to a man on an extraordinary journey that led to his unfortunate death and truthfully tell the…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    You're Missing Something Christopher McCandless is a man who had everything and gave it up because he was annoyed with the world and he wanted to escape. The drastic decision he made captivated many, especially the author Jon Krakauer because he had a similar experience and he could relate to McCandless's disappointments. Jan's review is based on the Outside Magazine article that was written by Krakauer describing McCandless's journey. To some McCandless' story is just a tale of nature's harsh reality, but for others they view him as a heroic figure. Many criticize him for venturing unprepared into the Alaskan wilderness and for inspiring others to do the same.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Identity In Into The Wild

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of writing Into the Wild is not relate the facts of a true adventure, but to show people that there is an escape from reality. Through McCandless, the wild was initially portrayed as harrowing and unpredictable, but as time went on McCandless learned to adapt to the wild, and bury himself from the flow of civilization. In the middle of McCandless’s travels, he encounters an elderly man named Ronald Franz. Franz, a man who seems to think he has fully lived, his life, sees a new person in McCandless that ultimately caused him to strongly consider spending his last few years surrounding by wilderness and seeking one last adventure. Franz wanted the feeling of experiencing the same mystifying feeling that comes with adventure.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays