Interrogation Vs Torture

Do you know how serious heinous crimes are throughout the U.S.?! And how many people get away with it?! It’s hard to get an answer out of someone that may be responsible for the crime, so I feel as if torture should defiantly be considered as a tool of interrogation. It’s way easier for detectives to receive answers, reduces the chance of the person being found not guilty and committing the crime again and also makes it safer for kids to walk to and from school without being paranoid. This is a serious crime and too many guilty people are being found innocent.
When FBI agents or detectives investigate a case, they tend to bring people in for questioning who they seem to think may fit the description of the potential suspect. Unfortunately, regardless of how critical the questions they ask may be, most suspects always find a loop hole from admitting that they’re guilty or that they may know someone that is involved. This is when torturing comes into play and makes the suspect speak up when he can no longer take the pain of being tortured. Torturing is an underrated tool of interrogation and needs to be used more often. I believe these investigators can do their jobs much more effectively by using torture upon sexually predators that ruining the community negatively. Abuse has to be enforced by the law for good reasoning, …show more content…
Imagine being in court knowing that this individual raped or molested your son or daughter and the judge finds them not guilty due to the failure of not having enough evidence to prove they were responsible. If tortured was applied, this criminal would not have been able to be get away so easily. Exerting physical pressure will have someone give off the information they don’t want to share because they can only take it to a certain point! Then, guess what? These animals go back into the world and commit the misconduct all over