The article explains why interracial couples shouldn't be encouraged. However, he doesn’t use sources to credit his facts. He wrote, “ In Canada, interracial couples form about 4% of the total national population of couples.” Then he goes on to explain that it was double in liberal cities of …show more content…
For example, throughout the article the writer uses unnecessary word to mislead the reader. He states, “ In a traditional healthy society people naturally gravitate towards heterosexual endogamy, but sadly, liberal programs and policies have deleterious effects on society’s health”. He takes the effort to use words that make his writing sound more believable so they reader would sway to his side of the argument. Secondly, he states, “ This why it is imperative that people boycott the mass media to insulate themselves from harmful signals and programming”. The writer makes his sentences, that not only confuse the reader, but show that his evidence isn’t reliable. It doesn’t help to use unnecessary word to make an argument seem more believable, because in order for a reader to think that piece of information is reliable it has to make