Defined by Thomas et al (2009) Interprofessional working is a ‘process whereby members of different professions and/or agencies work together to provide integrated health and/or social care for the benefit of service users’. It would be beneficial to me as a student Social Worker to establish consistency when sharing information effectively and communicate relevant knowledge …show more content…
A mis-communication between by self and service users could mean a breakdown in trust and rapport. My IPE week highlighted that it is not only the words in which I use, but the perception of my body language, tone and in turn the capability of my listening skills. At the beginning of my career within health care clear progress has been made in terms of my communication skills. I was very much a novice in my area and on many instances jargon was used when speaking to experienced colleagues which at that time resulted in me questioning my ability to carry out the job role. Upon reflection, I used this to benefit both myself, colleagues and service users alike. Not to disempower anyone when speaking I now avoid the use of jargon and abbreviations. I still find it hard to limit the use of jargon in professional settings, as a professional I cannot assume my colleagues have the same knowledge as …show more content…
As a professional carrying out duty involves person centred care. Tending to service users on an individual basis; adapting practice to ensure best possible outcomes for the service user. To ensure this is achieved I must remain non-judgemental and deliver anti-discriminatory practice. During the IPE week, Thompson’s PCS model of oppression was covered. Thompson (2006) states anti-discriminatory practice is ‘an approach which seeks to reduce, undermine or eliminate discrimination’. Professionals, such as Social Workers, are seen as occupying positions of power and influence, it is important to add this is not always intentional. Anti-discriminatory practice seeks to diminish discrimination from all practice. This model suggests oppression happens in three forms- personal, structural and cultural. Such forms each, in turn, link and interact by reinforcing one