Interpret Literature, Interpret Life In the epic poem Beowulf, too many people were reliant on the assistance of our powerful brawny main character. Everyone primarily yearned for safety, but seldom was anyone willing to attain these luxuries themselves. Much like how in today’s society, countless people rely on others to complete tasks and make changes occur. When in reality, it legitimately takes a village to improve the world. No one, not even the strongest of them can do it without the help of another. "We are all working together; that is the secret" (Sam Walton). Just because one is "strong" does not mean they are not in need of assistance. I say this because multiple times throughout the story, as well …show more content…
The battle with the dragon(2008-2130) is not pleasant. During this attack Wiglaf pleads with geats to assist Beowulf however they were to afraid to. This ultimately leads to the death of Beowulf due to the wound he received that was tainted in poison. My opinion on this section is that yes, although after 50 years we may not be able to consider Beowulf as agile and strong but I feel like the people did. After a 50 year rein of no attacks anyone being ignorant, or brave enough to attack him they believed he still had it. Or at least they wanted to. They still had the image of him killing Grendel and Grendels mother in their heads. In between the start of the attack and the end they convinced themselves that everything was fine and that Beowulf could handle it all. But he could …show more content…
Anthony. All of these people had a multitudinous amount of things in common. They were all amazing people, they each spoke out against what they felt was wrong, seemingly single-handedly they fought for there cause in their own way. But, one thing they also came to have in common, that is often failed to be glorified, is simple. Each of these people did not do it alone. They were only successful with the help of all the others that are not listed in the textbooks. People like you and I, who are the unspoken backbones of this society, the unaccredited ones who subtle guide this nation, to where ever it is this nation is going. Bottom-line, it was, and it is these big names that shape society, likewise it is the others that form the shape. Meaning that we may not be any of these house hold names (for me, not yet). But, we are the ones who make these household names relevant. Who would Rosa Parks be without the everyday people joining her for a boycott involving not riding the buses? Who would Sojourner Truth be without any female supporters during the suffrage era? Who would the government be without the cooperation of us Americans? Us. They would be us. A person with a dream, and a want, and a voice that shrieks to be heard and no one to listen. Why? Because they may have dreams, and wants, and voices, but they are lacking the majority of the people that are on