In Consequences Of Social Stratification In The Caribbean

Improved Essays
We have seen social stratification in the Caribbean transition over the years from a ‘closed system of stratification’ to that of an ‘open system stratification’. Social stratification in the Caribbean is based on class, status, power, race/ethnicity, colour, gender, education, etc. The Caribbean stratification system has been greatly influenced by its history of Colonialism, Plantation Slavery and Indentureship. Ascriptive factors such as race and the colour of one’s skin have contributed significantly in determining the life chances of Caribbean people. Today, although most of these territories are currently politically independent nation-states, the legacy of their history have continued to impact upon their individual social structure. …show more content…
Their ignorance and disregard of economic development is profound and deeply rooted in their past and present situation. They do not even seem to be aware of it. For several generations they have been confined to getting salaries or fees, money for services rendered. That is still their outlook.” James, C.L.R. 1973. The middle classes. In Consequences of class and colour: West Indian Perspective. Edited by David Lowenthal and Lambros Comitas. New York: Anchor Books: pp 80-82.

CLR James theory can be compared to the conflict perspective. Karl Marx saw the inequality as a means of exploitation in society. Those who own the means of production within society maintain their advantageous position in society by controlling or influencing the institutions in society, such as the political system, the educational system and the legal system. The values and ideology of the ruling class become those of the society.
For Karl Marx, in capitalist society there exist two main classes, the bourgeoisie-the ruling class or capitalists-and the proletariat-the working class or workers. The capitalists own the means of production while the working class owns the labour, which produces the wealth. Marx believed that the relationship between capitalists and workers was exploitative, as in all class
…show more content…
For women with these backgrounds, the chances were virtually non-existent; for men, hardly any better. Only 4 out of every 1000 males with agricultural origins were likely to end up in this top stratum, despite the vaunted expansion of the educational system and the opening up of new positions.
Derek Gordon argument juxtaposes to that of the functionalist perspective. Davis and Moore (1945) argue that ‘social stratification is useful as it contributes to the maintenance of society. For Davis and Moore, social stratification provides an effective mechanism for role allocation and performance. Davis and Moore further posits, that in order for society to attract the right talent to fill the myriad of social positions, a differential system of rewards must be offered and, based on meritocracy, must be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He divided the population into two groups: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie was the ruling class; they own the means of production and, because of this, control the people. The proletariat operates the means of production, and is controlled by the bourgeoisie. Marx claimed that everyone fit into one of these groups. Marx’s two social classes are very apparent in Fahrenheit 451’s society.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It pits the wealthy against the lower class of society. This conflict is not the product of greed, or the lack of compassion for the poor, but it is the product of capitalism in Marx 's view. Marx contends that a capitalist society can only lead to social inequality by reason of, it is designed to promote individualism . The proletariat sells their labor to the bourgeoisie, or the capitalist, for money, but the capitalist owns the machines, the building, the product, and everything else associated with making the product.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In society, status and class are two of the most significant social forces that contribute to one’s own image. Not being born in the right social ranking can make life further difficult .This can inhibit the social mobility of an individual if they decide to move up a rung in the ladder of society. This social inequality plays a role in society that few people are able to manage .The social constructs of inequality are far reaching, it even claws its way into the family. According to Dalton Conley author of The Pecking Order, “The truth is that inequality starts at home” (pg. 586).…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One might have same views, but what is different is that they approach them differently. Adam Smith and Karl marx are two economic philosophers best known for their social and economic thinking on how to drive an economy of capitalist views. These ideas in each of their works the Wealth of the Nations by Adam Smith and The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx both portray their ideologies on how a society functions. These ideas still lives with generations and gives lineage to the capitalistic society we live in. However, the same ideas that these economic philosopher had drove to different conclusions on how a capitalistic society should function.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the following essay I’ll be describing social stratification and distributive systems and how they compare to social and political stratification. “Social stratification means that’s inequality has been harden or institutionalized, and there is a system of social relationships that determines who gets what, and why” pg.10 (Kerbo, 2012). A system such as social stratification also means that rules have been established that shows why rewards or distributed and why they are distributed in a certain manner. Social stratification has been characterized by social class which groups individuals with those of similar income and political economic interest. The upper class make up the wealthy members of society and have the most political power.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is an emotion that is typically explored by psychologists. This can be studied by sociologists too. Sociologists have developed theories that explain responses based on group dynamics. Karl Marx and C. Wright Mills both have a view on society based on the class system. Marx developed his theory based on power within the capitalist system.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social theorists, writers and philosophers of almost every time period have examined the convoluted relationship between social relations and individuals including Karl Marx and Georg Simmel. While some have taken the approach that individuals are shaped by their social world, others insist that the social world itself is what shapes individuals. There are a few theories that exist with regards to the connection between individuals and society which will be discussed throughout this short essay in order to fully explain the relationship between individuals and society. Starting off with the conflict theory by Karl Marx, he was primarily focused on the structures of society. The conflict theory is one of the fundamental ideologies that explains social life as a battle between social groups for power and scarce resources.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx is a renowned leader and philosopher known for preaching his beliefs regarding socialism and differences between the social classes, and his viewpoints on society eventually grew into the principles which make up the Marxist lense. The Marxist lense can be used to analyze works of literature by timeless authors such as Ernest Hemingway. Marx was a believer that the primary cause of historical change was social class warfare. He also felt that the state or government has always used its power to oppress and exploit the laboring masses for the benefit of the upper elite, though it is questionable whether or not the general population noticed this occurring. Specifically, Marx labeled the powerful, revered upper class the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Brym and Lie (2012), social capital consists of the networks and connections individuals have with others that are of value, as they enable individuals to have more opportunities depending on the amount of possessed diverse networks (p.121). This paper will provide an example of how I was able to use social capital to my advantage in terms of employment, and how this is example is connected to the concept of stratification and conflict theory. Then I will end off with explaining how the sociological imagination allows me to better understand the competitiveness of the job market. An example of how I used social capital to my advantage to gain employment, would be when I was at my cousins wedding two years ago.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the first stage, production grew due to increasing division of labour. However, this was not enough to meet the demands of ever-expanding markets. This resulted in the improvement of technical knowledge and henceforth mechanization became a hallmark of capitalism. Marx believed capitalist society to be divided into 2 main classes- the bourgeois or the capitalist class which owns the means of production, & the proletariat or the working class which sells its labour in the market. The capitalist operates on the profit motive & does not pay workers, drawn from the industrial reserve army, wages equivalent to the value created by them.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social stratification is everywhere, even in different forms of societies, such as capitalist, communist or mixed. Social stratification can be understood as a system that a society ranks categories of people in hierarchy. A person social class in based on births and achievements in life and an individual position within class structure shows social status. Social stratification is a society that ranks people and Marx and Weber both have different ways of how they view social stratification. This essay will look at both Marx view of social stratification which is bourgeoisie and proletariat and Weber view of social stratification which is class, standë/status, and party/power.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays