Intentional Tort Essay

There are significant differences between crime and tort. In their definition, crime refers to any wrongful act that has been performed and goes against the laid down rules and regulations of a state or a federal government (Chamallas & Sperino, 2014). In criminal activities, the punishment is likely to be a fine or sentence charged on the defendant if proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt. On the other hand, a tort is a wrongful act that has been executed and violates the rights of another person and or property for unliquidated damages. If found guilty, the tort doer is punished by being made to pay damages to the defendant. In conclusion, a tort is a civil wrong that infringes the legal rights of another person. The act has a constitutional remedy (Abraham, 2017).
Intentional tort and negligence analysis
There are some differences between intentional tort and negligence. Intentional tort refers to any wrongful act that was executed willingly and violates both private and property rights. Intentional torts would include assault, battery, and defamation among others. Additionally, intentional torts against property would include trespass (Abraham, 2017). On the other hand, negligence refers to the unexpected occurrences that occur due to the failure of an individual to …show more content…
That way, the process will go well, and no harms will be received. That is what standard care can be used to refer. On the other hand, the breach of duty is when an individual decides to violate the law and fails to take care of what has been placed on them by the law (Abraham, 2017). The failure to take care of what the law has placed under an individual’s responsibility is the breach of duty. It amounts to negligence. Therefore, had standard care been given or exercised towards a particular situation, breach of duty would not have occurred and therefore, negligence would not be in the