They are musical, naturalist, intrapersonal, interpersonal, spatial, linguistic, logical mathematical, and bodily kinesthetic. He believed that these intelligences were basically independent of each other and we used the appropriate intelligence(s) depending on the situation. Another approach to intelligence is the triarchic theory of intelligence. Psychologist Robert Sternberg felt intelligence was composed of componential, experiential, and contextual elements. The componential element looked at individual’s ability to process and analyze information. The experiential element focused on insight. Practical intelligence was known as the contextual …show more content…
In the past, people felt their IQ score was a magical number that predicted future success. For the most part it does predict success in academics, but it doesn’t measure social skills or personality traits. Now it is understood that a combination of smarts, social skills, and personality make up intelligence. A person with a high IQ, but lack of social skills and personality may not do so well in society or be successful as measured by the culture they live in. A person with an average IQ, great social skills, and personality may do very well in society and be extremely successful. Don’t put too much stock in IQ scores, they are not magic numbers that can determine the course of your life. In conclusion, intelligence is very hard to define. Many psychologists have different views as to what constitutes intelligence. Some feel it is only cognitive. Others feel it is fluid, crystalized, or triarchic in theory. Because of these varying beliefs, many different intelligence tests have been developed to measure intelligence. Intelligence tests can help predict academic success, but not necessarily future success in