The beginning of intelligence-led policing introduced a new paramount into the ideologies of crime control and policing practices. This style of policing gathers evidence to improve crime prevention and detection, better distribute the use of resources for police, improve effectiveness and enhance partnerships. Although for the philosophy’s of intelligence policing to be effective, decision makers need a critical understanding of the intelligence model to make a positive impact on the criminal environment. This essay will evaluate the research of intelligence-led policing and closely analyse the Australian Federal Policies adaption to its ideals through the use of scholarly articles, AFP corporate plans and annual reports while evaluating the
…show more content…
The use of the intelligence method is prominent with the AFP through collecting information and data to produce intelligence. The AFP also employs the use of both strategic and Tactical intelligence in their practices, theoretically being that strategic intelligence uses long-term initiatives, strategies on emerging problems and structures of serious organised crime while tactical intelligence focuses on short-term initiatives, looking closely at criminal groups and activities (Buckley 2013). A practical example is the Specialist Response group that provides tactical strategies through intelligence operational priorities for a diverse range of AFP operations and building missions (AFP 2016). A difference identified through analysing the AFPS initiatives compared to the academic intelligence methods is the AFP’s use of public relations through educating the public with critical matters and receiving information from the public to improve statistics and crime prevention techniques. This is initiated through the AFPs virtual global taskforce for cyber crime, focusing on informing the public on risks and preventative actions (AFP Corporate Plan 2015-2019). This is differentiated due to early models of Intelligence-led policing deriving before the Internet was a global tool used for criminal activity and to police advantages. Overall the Australia Federal Police follow closely with the academic ideologies of Intelligence-led policing in their
The use of the intelligence method is prominent with the AFP through collecting information and data to produce intelligence. The AFP also employs the use of both strategic and Tactical intelligence in their practices, theoretically being that strategic intelligence uses long-term initiatives, strategies on emerging problems and structures of serious organised crime while tactical intelligence focuses on short-term initiatives, looking closely at criminal groups and activities (Buckley 2013). A practical example is the Specialist Response group that provides tactical strategies through intelligence operational priorities for a diverse range of AFP operations and building missions (AFP 2016). A difference identified through analysing the AFPS initiatives compared to the academic intelligence methods is the AFP’s use of public relations through educating the public with critical matters and receiving information from the public to improve statistics and crime prevention techniques. This is initiated through the AFPs virtual global taskforce for cyber crime, focusing on informing the public on risks and preventative actions (AFP Corporate Plan 2015-2019). This is differentiated due to early models of Intelligence-led policing deriving before the Internet was a global tool used for criminal activity and to police advantages. Overall the Australia Federal Police follow closely with the academic ideologies of Intelligence-led policing in their