The integration of forensic evidence into the criminal justice system has historically been regarded as an exceptional and a positive influence. However, recent cases have shed a new light which reports forensic evidence and forensic testimonies as corrupted. Many forensic disciplines, such as those analyzing impression marks and items like hair and fiber, the testing methods used for these analysis have been applied with very limited proof as to how effective is the reliability of the above examinations. Garrett & Neufeld (2009) argue that forensic analysis offers invalid and flawed conclusion. They classified the problems with forensics with two types, labelled as reliability and validity. The first problem was the use of unreliable forensic
