Importance Of Spirt Of Inquiry

Superior Essays
I think the spirt of inquiry means the essential qualities needed for inquiry. The spirit is the qualities that a person has that allows them to inquire. Without the “spirit” inquiry may be difficult or unattainable. In the book they talk about the spirit of inquiry being the attitude or orientation of the participants. I think in order to have this attitude or orientation; you must also have these essential qualities. One attitude and beliefs I believe is basic to the spirt of inquiry is being open minded. I think this is the most important part of inquiry. I believe people need to willing to be open minded and have their thoughts and ideas challenged. If you are close minded you might think that, that’s just the way things are and may not be willing to change your thoughts. I think you also have to believe that you everything you hear shouldn’t be taken at face value. I think this thought helps drive inquiry. I think not having these qualities are obstacles to the …show more content…
Open-mindedness is an important part of inquiry. Are you staying being open-minded? This question can be answered through careful evaluation of your own views. Are you looking at both sides? Are you considering counter evidence? If we are keeping an open mind, we are able to consider other sides, and be willing to have our views change.

5. How might we respond to fallacies that arise through dialogue? (pages 205-208) Earlier in on of the reading guides, I spoke about a debate about the presidential election. All though I was not directly involved in the debate, I was able to sit back and listen to the various sides. I noted that several people had fallacies within the argument. Although they were not aware, and before this class I would not either. These fallacies were not handled maybe how they should have. In these section I took fallacies that were explained in chapter 4 and chapter 5 and suggest how they could be responded to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    With a ferocious intensity and unwilting determination both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump go head-to-head in a series of catastrophic arguments over which candidate would make America a better country. During the debate, the atmosphere was tense and the audience held no trace of humor, but instead very serious questions that the audience thought were relevant to determining which candidate that they should vote for. Throughout the centuries, American citizens have relied on the presidential debates to determine which presidential candidate would be best suited for the role of the the leader of the free world. Although some citizens may say that the presidential debate may be more biased to one candidate and the citizens of America would…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.0 Introduction 1.1 Authorisation and purpose This report is authorised by Dr Gregory Nash, Course Coordinator University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland. The purpose of this report is to fulfil the report writing task for COR 109 Communication and Thought, at the University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. 1.2 Limitations This report is limited to the three interpersonal communication skills of listening, feedback and questioning and does not enlighten any other interpersonal communication skills.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Spot Fallacies: The Seven Deadly Logical Sins”, Jay Heinrichs tries to warn the people of the common fallacies that are used in one’s daily life and tries to explain how they can be caught. Mainly Heinrichs targets politics and the tactics that infest politics. He is speaking to the common voter on how politicians use these fallacies can be caught and disproven, so citizens will not be led astray. Aside from his whole article Heinrichs breaks it down to “Bad proof, Bad conclusion, Disconnect between proof and conclusions” (Heinrichs, 169). For example, he talks about the fallacy of antecedent, where he explains that someone who says something will never happen because it hasn’t occurred in the past, therefore, it won’t occur in the future…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a recent presidential debate, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton argued their character, and if they are fit to serve as president of the United States or not. Throughout their debate they depended on both rhetorical fallacies and strategies to build their arguments and prove their capability to run this country. Although the arguments made by the candidates seem to be just repetitive nuances of common issues, this debate gives us an idea of the duties and character traits a president must obtain. From start to finish, the candidates in this debate use rhetorical strategies to make their arguments stand out.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The presidential debates between both presidential parties exploited several rhetorical devices to convey compelling interpretations of what the American people want. The Democratic and Republicans debates covered an array of several contentious issues regarding the well-being of the United States with diverse opinions and thoughts for the American people. The prominent rhetorical devices used in both political debates were evident, such as, repetition; ridicule and innuendo were among the many used during both presidential debates. The earlier mentioned rhetorical devices were primarily used to deviate from unfavorable scrutiny that may negatively convey the individual(s) as incompetent in regards to contentious topics discussed. Conventionally,…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James W. Ceaser

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I definitely agree with everything that James W. Ceaser stated in his writing. I do firmly believe that strengthened political parties would help our electoral process instead of having ruthless candidates “strengthened” by their organizations and here’s why. Before, candidates used to be chosen by members of the party; they would choose whoever was best fit to carry out the party’s platform the best. Since then, however, this idea has been long gone, which leads parties to have no direct influence over what candidate will be chosen. Political parties are no longer and identifier when people are asked who they are voting for or which side they are on. This is a very significant because it is one of the biggest issues of today’s election system, campaigns now are focused more than ever on candidates rather than the party platform.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite that the argument being made is quite justifiable, the techniques used in the essay are ineffective in asserting the main idea. This is because the techniques…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Distraction! Is the main point of the Red Herring fallacy. The name originates from the 18th century when British fugitives would use the distinctive scent of a Red Herring on their trail to divert and contaminating their pathway. Red Herring fallacy is categorized as “Ignoratio elenchi” which translates to “ignorance of the proof” in Latin. Red Herrings are mostly used in law, politics and mystery novels.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With the presidential election right around the corner politics has never been more important than they are right now. To pick between two nominees who both have flaws is very difficult, especially when you are a first time voter. I have to take into consideration the lies from one candidate and the derogatory comments made from the other. My family will try to sell the candidate they support to me, thinking it will guide me in the right direction, but only I can have a say when it comes to casting my ballot. It was important for me to pay attention to each debate so I could understand each candidate’s platform on major issues.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative fallacy 's can be seen in everyday life from talking with one 's mom to speaking with their boss, the trouble is identifying these fallacy 's and being aware that they do exist and can affect oneself and the person they are speaking to. Being able to know the difference between an ad hominem and straw man could be the difference between winning one 's argument. To begin with, two quite opposite articles have been provided that contain a central claim about the Iraq war. One of these articles is written by Anna Quindlen, 'We 've been here before ', while the other one is by Donald Stoker, 'Insurgencies rarely win '.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtuous Minds Summary

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Being fair-minded is not the same as being completely open, because more often than not that is when you get hurt. When people go away from being fair-minded, they fall away from truth. But those who are fair-minded desperately want to know truth. When we stop believing in truth the virtue of fair-mindedness morphs into meaninglessness.” (Dow, 48) People need to be fair-minded, putting truth above their opinions and be in pursuit of learning.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Jerome Cohen in his article “Fear of the Monster is Really a Kind of Desire” examines the issue of being with a monster or better be the monster ourselves. The desire it can be either for power, freedom, or even just to be the center of attention. “We distrust and loathe the monster at the same time we envy its freedom, and perhaps its sublime despair” (Cohen, 190). People tend to watch scary movies and read monster stories and feel attracted to one of the monsters and wish to be that monster. In Halloween is the only time when a human being can express the realm of the monster they want to be just for a night and celebrate by asking for candy in the neighborhood or having a Halloween party.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the article “Teaching Practices of living inquiry” by Karen Meyer there were many ideas that were new to me such as the main concept of living inquiry. I was curious to know and understand how an ongoing living of an everyday life can be a practice. A practice which lets you enjoy every part of your life living in “being in the moment” and from this theory Karen Meyer developed a course which involves pedagogy and practices of each experience. From reading the article and putting these thoughts into real life practices I can now understand and visualize what it means to have a living inquiry.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teaching controversial issues in the classroom through discussion is the most beneficial method for students to learn about these matters because it teaches them how to be open-minded, think critically about their own beliefs, and forces them to master their public speaking and interpersonal skills. The benefits of using discussions in classrooms to teach contentious topics are endless but the three previously mentioned have proven to be the most valuable by students, teachers, and parents everywhere. Class discussions force students to listen, embrace, and be respectful of opinions and beliefs that are divergent to their own. As mentioned by David Bridges (1979), an author who has formerly analyzed the notion of discussion, the sharing of…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay is to analyze what the speaker or writer is saying critically. The speech that I analyzed was Michelle Obama’s speech on gun violence. Her speech was persuasively successful because of the fact that Michelle used logos and ethos in her speech. The way she was credible throughout her speech and stated her examples made the speech successful. The reason why Michelle Obama’s speech was effective because of the use of arguments about cause and effects, arguments from analogy, and bandwagon techniques.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays