Informed consent is the right a patient has to determine what is done to their body. The person must be well informed as well as volunteer for informed consent to work. Today, many people talk about how one is to decide if a person is competent or not and who is to make that ultimate decision if someone really is competent or not. My question is do you think the age limit should be reevaluated on informed consent? Eighteen seems to be such a standard age on our country for things to become legal, but if there is a fifteen year old child who has battled cancer for three years, shouldn't they be able to decide things for themselves, assuming they have sufficient knowledge of their diagnosis at this point? The same question could be argued
