• Home Page
  • Informative Essay On Miranda Rights

Informative Essay On Miranda Rights

Improved Essays
Show More
People always hear police officers on TV say, "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you." This is one thing that police officers say to people in custody or during an interrogation in real life. These are called Miranda Rights or Miranda Warnings. They get to inform people of their rights before they are forced to do something they don't want to do. They get to ensure that people get to have a fair trial and they are allowed to be provided with an attorney. There are many different ways that these warnings are important to everybody, and they help enforce justice, with the people’s rights in mind..
The name of the rights comes from Ernesto Miranda. He was a convicted rapist who had no idea of his rights as he was being convicted. He then sued the state of Arizona because of a violation of his rights. Then after the case, it became a common law to state the Miranda Warnings before pursuing somebody. Now people have the right to remain silent, which means to remain silent for a question anyone doesn’t want to answer. People also have the right to an attorney, and one will be provided to those who cannot afford one. So with these …show more content…
www.mirandarights.org/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2017.
Miranda Warnings: Be Aware of Your Rights. www.mirandawarning.org/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2017.
Nix, Elizabeth. “Who Is the Miranda Warning Named for?” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 7 Jan. 2015, www.history.com/news/ask-history/who-is -the-miranda-warning-named-for. Accessed 28 Feb. 2017.
“The Miranda Rights Are Established.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-miranda-rights-are-established. Accessed 28 Feb. 2017.
Head, Tom. “Supreme Court Self-Incrimination Cases - the Miranda Warning and More.” About.com News & Issues, 12 Feb. 2017, civilliberty.about.com/od/lawenforcemen tterrorism/tp/Self-Incrimination-Supreme-Court.htm. Accessed 28 Feb.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Case Study: Miranda V. Arizona

    1. What has been the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona on both law enforcement agencies and the court. -The arrested suspect must be told that they have the right to remain silent -The arrested suspect must be told that anything they say may be used against them in court -The arrested suspect must be told they have the right to an attorney with them before any questioning begins -They must be told that if they cannot afford an attorney an attorney can be provided for free -After they are told their rights and the arrested suspect says that they do not want an attorney and is willing to be questioned that they said so willingly and knowingly -The suspect has the right to turn off questioning any time after they have…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Court Case Summary
    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Court Case Summary

    Arizona roused a question of how the constitution and its amendments apply in a court of law. A case in the past had already established that the Fifth amendment protected anyone from being forced to confess, or speak without an attorney, but according to the Miranda vs. Arizona trial, his interrogation prior to his trial was not unconstitutional. The ruling sparked a discussion within America that would later lead to a momentous creation of a list of standards to be used in all jurisdictions within court that would reduce the abuse of a person’s rights during trial, aiding to prevent wrongful or biased…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Samuel Alito's Case Summary
    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Samuel Alito's Case Summary

    The supreme court justices Samuel Alito answered to this case that Mr. Salina didn't have the right to remain silent. Mr. Salina was free to leave, which didn't insert his Miranda rights and he had therefore no right to remain silent. Justices Samuel Alito stated that Mr. Salina´s should have affirmatively invoked his rights, because without Mr. Salina´s having a lawyer or being told the Miranda rights he should have been more affirmative about his invoking. (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/salinas_v_texas_right_to_remain_silent_supreme_court_right_to_remain_silent.html) Salinas v. Texas is demonstrating the Miranda rules in a way where if the rules doesn´t apply the questioned from the beginning the Miranda rights doesn't apply either.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case: Lisenba Vs. New York
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Case: Lisenba Vs. New York

    Since Miranda v. Arizona (1956) the Supreme Court watered down the protection of suspects during interrogation in several ways. The Miranda warnings weakened when courts decided they were not Fifth Amendment rights (Hemmens, 2014). Miranda warnings weakened when Courts ruled that police violations are inadmissible and does not apply to evidence obtained through Miranda violated interrogations. In addition, the courts ruled that not all parts of the Miranda warnings need to be read to suspects. One of the most damaging Miranda warnings were weakened when courts decided that if a confession was made through an interrogation that violated Miranda rules, the confession is admissible once the suspect Miranda rights were properly read (Hemmens, 2014, p. 28).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Research Paper

    The Miranda warning includes what rights we have when we are being arrested or interrogated. Police officers or other law enforcement officers must tell a person their Miranda rights during an arrest. After the warning is given to someone being arrested, the person also has the right to speak to an attorney. These rights became a part of the Fifth and Six amendments that already existed in our U.S. Constitution.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Cases
    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona Supreme Court Cases

    In the early 1960’s four men were arrested on different crimes.. In the police department those men confessed to their crimes without ever being told their rights, mainly that the Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment. The confessions were used in court, and it became a question of whether those men’s constitutional rights had been violated. The question was answered in the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Public Safety Exception Case Study
    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Public Safety Exception Case Study

    Newton (2004) 369 F.3d 659; see Allen v. Roe (2002) 305 F.3d 1046 (where the objectively reasonable need be based on what the officer knew at the time of questioning); see also United States v. Jones (2001) 154 F.2d 617 (likewise, holding the public exception applicable where police knew the suspect had a firearm in the apartment unattended with children present). In determining the objectively reasonable need, courts consider whether the defendant might have or recently have had a weapon and that someone other than the police might gain access to that weapon and inflict harm. (United States v. Williams (2007) 483 F.3d 425.) Accordingly, Miranda warnings are not required where there’s an objectively reasonable need in protecting the police or public from immediate danger and statements stemming from custodial interrogation must not be…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay
    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    When someone is being questioned intensely, most people called that giving the “third degree.” Before the court case of Miranda vs Arizona, the police would use varies methods to get a confession out of a person such as intimidation or coercing. Thanks to the Miranda Warning, the police can no longer, well they are not supposed to use any of those methods as acquiring a confession out of a person. The reason for the Miranda Warning also known as the Miranda Rights, is because in 1966 Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping, robbing, and raping. When the police interrogated him, he confessed to the crimes.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis
    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Dbq Analysis

    Arizona (1966). This decision, generally speaking, defined the rights of the accused after an appeal was made on behalf of Ernesto Miranda. It said, among other things, that each person accused of a crime has the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney (Document 7). The tradition of these Miranda rights has become common knowledge in American society, despite the fact that some people believe that they are generally too lenient and often hamper the justice system’s ability to convict guilty criminals of their crimes (Documents 5a & 5b). The Supreme Court has failed to see adequate need for reversal of this decision, despite the dramatic odds that lie in favour of the accused as a result of the decision, and the fact that the victim is often left without help when the offender is not convicted.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    The infringement of Miranda’s rights by the police granted Miranda the right to appeal and challenge the verdict rendered in the initial case. On appeal, Miranda’s lawyer pointed out how the police failed in their role of informing Miranda of his right to remain silent, the right to be represented by a lawyer, and anything he says can be used against him in a court of law. The landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in 1966 pivoted in favor of the defendant by a majority ruling of 5 – 4. The broad ruling held the police at fault for not exercising proper principles of interrogation, highlighting the need for law enforcement officers to make specific points clear to a suspect before questioning (Bloom…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Robinson V. California Case Study
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robinson V. California Case Study

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    It is well within the rights of a police officer to use coercion to elicit answers from the accused, but allowing for that small shift in power only ensures greater shifts in power until it's borderline abuse. In past cases such as, Gideon V. Wainwright (1963), criminal defendant, Clarence Gideon, was convicted without ever have spoken to a lawyer despite his demands for one, this oversight in justice and slight against him further prove the importance of miranda rights. The Miranda warning ensures every citizen knows their constitutional rights, reaffirming the powers of the people and their right to know what they legally have to endure and the means by which it happens. This levels the powers of the police with the powers of the accused, keeping a neutral ground on which both have room to exercise their respective liberties. The Miranda warning ensures the liberty of the accused and the police by allowing for the entire police force to operate under a standard, keeping their integrity and liberty intact.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Five Amendments
    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Five Amendments

    Whereas the Fourth Amendment uses probable cause to set up if a crime is, has, or is about to occur and an arrest can be made. Then the Fifth Amendment comes into play, with the questioning of a person who has been arrested and the rights to the arrested person, specifically the reading of Miranda Rights. In 1966, Ernesto Miranda’s civil rights from the Fifth and Sixth were found to have been violated during the investigation and following interrogation. The Supreme Court determined that anyone who is in custody and being questioned needs to be read his or her specific rights, which included: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judicial Summary: Miranda V. Arizona

    Arizona in 1966. In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for various serious crimes. He was not informed of his rights before the police interrogation in which he supposedly gave a recorded confession to the crimes. He also did not have a counsel present. Miranda was found guilty of his crimes solely on the basis of his confession.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The People Vs. Larry Flynt Analysis

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings