Criminal law is a system constructed to punish those who commit crimes such as personal, property, statutory infractions. Punishment is built-in the criminal justice system because it is intended to reduce and/or eliminate behavior that society deems unacceptable.
Firstly, retribution is a rationale of punishment that fits the sayings "an eye for an eye." This technique works in favor for those seeking criminals to receive their "just desserts" as well as distinguish the justice systems effectiveness towards wrongdoers. Secondly, prevention is a rationale of punishment that seeks to reduce and deter crime and criminals. Deterrence is intended to promote prevention of future crimes towards the defendant as well as the general public. This philosophy …show more content…
This type of judgment requires professionals to rely on their education, training, and experience to carry out an action. Law enforcement officers are placed with the responsibility to either disregard the law understand circumstances or enforce the law to the fullest extent by arresting someone. However, once following arrest the case is in the prosecuting attorney decision for filing. They have the power to either prosecute the defendant to the fullest extent or plea bargain with the defendant to cooperate with the state. No doubt there is disapproval regarding informal decision-making in the criminal justice system for the reason that there is a suspicion of corruption. For a while, certain members of society have felt that law enforcement officers have abused their power in making informal decision-making. It was emphasized in 2016 pertaining to Caucasian police officers targeting the African-American community by using excessive physical force and weaponry as their first response to resolve issues. Meanwhile, Caucasian police officers would have a different approach towards a suspect of the same race to handle a dispute. In my opinion, I do believe there has been a mismanagement of informal discretionary decision-making and needs to be reduced because officials in power appear to benefit a select few instead of the majority. In order to make the public comfortable and have faith in the criminal justice system those in power such as law enforcement, prosecuting attorneys, judges, and probation officers need find a balance between morals and values when making a judgment against someone or
Firstly, retribution is a rationale of punishment that fits the sayings "an eye for an eye." This technique works in favor for those seeking criminals to receive their "just desserts" as well as distinguish the justice systems effectiveness towards wrongdoers. Secondly, prevention is a rationale of punishment that seeks to reduce and deter crime and criminals. Deterrence is intended to promote prevention of future crimes towards the defendant as well as the general public. This philosophy …show more content…
This type of judgment requires professionals to rely on their education, training, and experience to carry out an action. Law enforcement officers are placed with the responsibility to either disregard the law understand circumstances or enforce the law to the fullest extent by arresting someone. However, once following arrest the case is in the prosecuting attorney decision for filing. They have the power to either prosecute the defendant to the fullest extent or plea bargain with the defendant to cooperate with the state. No doubt there is disapproval regarding informal decision-making in the criminal justice system for the reason that there is a suspicion of corruption. For a while, certain members of society have felt that law enforcement officers have abused their power in making informal decision-making. It was emphasized in 2016 pertaining to Caucasian police officers targeting the African-American community by using excessive physical force and weaponry as their first response to resolve issues. Meanwhile, Caucasian police officers would have a different approach towards a suspect of the same race to handle a dispute. In my opinion, I do believe there has been a mismanagement of informal discretionary decision-making and needs to be reduced because officials in power appear to benefit a select few instead of the majority. In order to make the public comfortable and have faith in the criminal justice system those in power such as law enforcement, prosecuting attorneys, judges, and probation officers need find a balance between morals and values when making a judgment against someone or