Should There Be Infinite

Superior Essays
To the best of our knowledge, humans are the only creatures on earth that are able to contemplate infinity. We commonly talk about the infinite universe (which cosmologists now tell us is almost certainly finite but unbounded), we speak of infinite number series, such as the set of even numbers, and we use it metaphorically, as in saying someone has “infinite patience.” Time itself is spoken of as infinite, though it is always tied to finite objects which are changing and we can 't even come up with a coherent definition of what it is.
What makes something finite? That seems simple enough. An object is finite because it possesses specific qualities which determine its very nature and separate it from all other existents—even those composed of the same substances. If someone were to hold
…show more content…
Even his friends shook their heads regretfully in sympathy for my misery.
The conversation appeared ready to move on to another topic, but there was a sudden inspiration rising up in me which was triggered by a recent lecture in our Ancient Greek Philosophy course. The pre-Socratic philosopher Zeno had claimed that change and motion were illusions and he attempted to demonstrate this by presenting a set of apparent contradictions utilizing the concept of infinity.
His paradox of the arrow can be briefly summarized as follows: When an archer looses an arrow at a target, to reach its destination it must first travel halfway there. Then it must travel halfway from the halfway point to the target. The distance it travels can always be divided into more halfway points, all the way into infinity, and the arrow will never reach the target. Thus, the notion that it does so is merely an illusion, not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, unlike Plato, Mill focuses on one’s ability to think “practically” as well as “scientifically” (Mill, 2002, p.10). In such instances, the telling of false stories will not suffice. Instead,…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes, Plato, and The Matrix: A Comparison The Matrix, The Republic, and Meditations on First Philosophy all provide some valuable food for thought on the issues of reality and what we think we know to be true. Through their similarities and differences, we can explore some interesting perspectives on the age-old questions of “what can we know for sure if anything?” and “how do we know what we know?” As they have been, these questions will likely continue to be debated and explored for thousands of years to come. After studying the short readings, I see similarities from all three that all stem from doubt.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Reality? We are all unique. We all have our own way of thinking, seeing things and interpreting them. Not one person sees things the same way you do.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories Of Perdurantism

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Change in the properties of objects over time is a problem for the persistence of these objects. Properties of objects change over time such as trees growing taller and candles melting. Haslanger (2003) notes that this is a problem if we want to call these objects the same thing after change even though they have incompatible properties (p. 316). The tree in the field cannot have the properties of both being five meters tall and six meters tall. Perdurantism is one of the theories that attempts to explain how objects persist over time by explaining why objects can have incompatible properties.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Arrow Paradox

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Zeno put much thought into motion, and came up with four different reasons as to why motion does not exist. There is the “Dichotomy” paradox, the “Achilles” paradox, the “Arrow” paradox, and the “Stadium” paradox. In all of these paradox’s Zeno made something that is obviously true, motion, and made an argument to prove motion to be false. The “Arrow” paradox will be the paradox explained throughout this paper.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay Of Supervenience

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even though the completeness of physics provides strong support for physicalism, in the case of the mind this does not necessarily mean that mental properties must be reduced to physical ones, only that the ‘mental’ must depend upon the physical base – the brain. Papineau’s claim that the “the mental is ontologically inseparable from the physical” (Papineau, 1993, p. 23) does not necessarily mean that the mental can be reduced to the physical. But if mind properties are still a particular kind of physical properties, how then are mental and physical properties related? Note that the question is in terms of relations, not in terms of realization or implementation; the later will be discussed shortly.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Managing to break free from my mother’s grasp, I charged. With arms flailing and chubby legs fluttering beneath me, I was the ferocious two year old rampaging through Costco on a Saturday morning. My mother’s eyes widened in horror as I jettisoned my churro; the cinnamonsugar rocket gracefully sliced its way through the air while I continued my spree. I sprinted through the aisles, looking up in awe at the massive bulk products that towered over me. Overcome with wonder, I wanted to touch and taste, to stick my head into industrialsized freezers, to explore every crevice.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As discussed, there are a number of common arguments against the eliminative materialism’s claim. In this section, I will highlight and review a number of reasonable objections to eliminativism, such as the Commonsense Objections to eliminative materialism, which suggests that it is completely absurd or self-refuting. I will conclude that many of the arguments set forth by Eliminative Materialism, are not really convincing and that eliminativism needs to do more than simply show that FP is largely wrong. COMMON -SENSE OBJECTIONS 1. EM is completely absurd!…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Alex Scarrow said, “Time travel is a terrifying weapon, far more powerful than anything ever conceived, mankind just is not ready for that kind of knowledge. We are like children playing with an atom bomb”. Time travel gives humans power that they are incapable of handling. We often take aspects that have the chance to be used for goodness and use them to benefit our selfish desires. Time travel also puts people in a supernatural place of authority.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their writings, Descartes and Berkeley argue the nature of sensible objects. Sensible objects are what are perceivable to the mind. The nature of how these objects are perceived and if, what the mind perceives exists is the foundation of both Descartes and Berkeley’s arguments. Are sensible objects distinctly external matter that are perceived by the mind, or are they created within the distinct mind and perceived directly. The arguments are related to Descartes and Berkeley’s different stances on rationalism and empiricism, or if our minds identify knowledge of sensible objects through experience or innate knowledge.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dual Multiplex of the Divided Line Argument, in the conversational Platonic sense, is one possible way to come to accurate conclusions. In an argument, two or more opposing sides all present their evidence, and, upon deliberation, all sides come to a unanimous conclusion, which forms a thesis. In when more evidence is brought forward, the thesis is compared to the antithesis, and synthesis occurs through which a new, more refined thesis is created. In Plato’s Republic, this dialectical process is used to define Justice, first in the macroexample of a hypothetical perfect state, and then for the individual. When coming to to the definition of Justice, Socrates argues his points by finding apparent contradictions, and then resolving them…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Matrix: Final There is an assurance that at one point in life, the end will come for each individual and everybody will perish at one point. For now, as humans and living things, we are all doing what we do best, exist. However, imagine if the life one believes to be a part of was not actual and in fact, it was all just a virtual concept in the mind. Having had watched the film, The Matrix, this paper analyzes comparisons between appearance and reality to the writings of Bertrand Russell’s, Problems of Philosophy. Thenceforward, René Descartes’, Meditations on First Philosophy are examined and the Method of Doubt is conveyed, carefully analyzing each of its stages.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bertrand Russell had posed the question whether or not physical matter actually exist. He elaborated this point through argumentations and questions seen in his ‘Problems of Philosophy’ specified in the ‘Appearance and Reality’ and the ‘Existence of Matter’ – where he (Russell) claimed that the notion of existence lies in the essence of our sense data (sense-datum), with matter seen as non-existent. Throughout this essay, focus will be laid on Russell’s doubt and scepticism regarding real objects, where he described it as an irrational conception. With this in mind, attention must be put forth on the explanatory reasons used by Russell in the justification of his claim, and the account of whether or not he effectively answers the problem of scepticism in the external world.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays