Inductive Argument

Improved Essays
The existence of God has always been, and remains to be, one of the most widely debated and divisive philosophical issues. Arguments surrounding God’s existence are timelessly important. For many who follow belief systems rooted in monotheism, these arguments support their belief and validate the faith they follow. Others draw comfort from proof of God’s existence, as they feel protected and cared for, and often this can reaffirm a belief in the afterlife too. For some, the arguments are important to satisfy curiosity and answer questions. One thing they all have in common is belief that these arguments are essential. To assess three of the most common arguments, the Teleological, Cosmological and Ontological arguments, it is important to analyse …show more content…
Inductive arguments are those which begin with a premise, based on experience and use this as the basis for a universal claim about the world. Inductive arguments are often less trustworthy , as despite the truth of a premise, it is only speculative to draw a conclusion solely on personal experience.
Because the number of observations we can have is always finite, it can never be certain that the next observation will have the same outcome as the previous – this is known as the problem of induction.

When examining the arguments success, it becomes clear also that an inductive argument can never truly be valid. The definition of validity is given as: “in a valid argument, the conclusion has been correctly inferred from the premises”. Because of the problem of induction, a conclusion cannot necessarily be true if the premises are not definite. If the argument cannot be valid, it also cannot be sound.

However, inductive arguments are not therefore useless, but instead must be analysed differently. Though an inductive argument can never be certain, an argument can be strong or weak dependent on the number of times it has been observed . For example,
…show more content…
Deductive arguments tend to begin with a general premise and go on to draw a conclusion on a specific fact from the general claim given. The Ontological argument is an a priori argument.

One of the most obvious criticisms of the Teleological argument was presented by Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was not satisfied by Paley’s watch analogy, and criticised the argument by saying it takes for granted that the natural world is actually similar to man-made objects. Hume argued that the strength of an anaological argument (like the Teleological Argument) was dependent on the similarity of the things being compared - though both are complex, besides this there is little similarity between the two, therefore any conclusion drawn from the argument is considered weak.

Hume also presented a second criticism: at best, the Teleological argument only proves the world was designed, not necessarily that God was the designer. Hume said “just because it looks designed, it doesn’t follow that it really was designed, nor does it follow that God was the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The teleological argument is an argument attempting to prove God’s existence based on the evidence of design and order in the universe. It works based on the belief that there must have been an intelligent designer, and the only being powerful enough to have created the universe is God. The argument is a posteriori and inductive; it looks at our experience of the universe and draws inferences from it. As they are based on inferences, these conclusions are statements of probability rather than perfect proofs. Many philosophers have worked on the teleological argument – for example, Thomas Aquinas and William Paley.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Arguments in deductive reasoning are either valid or invalid as for inductive reasoning; arguments can be strong or weak. Typically conclusions that are formed from deductive…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Does the internet make you dumb” Nicholas car uses Inductive reasoning. According to Evan Heit and Caren Rotello, “Research on inductive reasoning has examined the effects of varying the number of premises…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Toulmin Argument

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assignment 4 Naree L. Greenland Argument and Exposition 2152 A practical and powerful method of constructing and analyzing arguments is the Toulmin Argument, so named after its creator British philosopher Stephen Toulmin. This method asserts to breaking down an argument into several parts, The claim,evidence, Warrants backing and qualifiers all form the building blocks of Toulmin’s argument structure. The claim is the argument you wish to prove (130), the main part of the argument.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The authors choice of structure impact the effectiveness of the argument being made by using inductive reasoning. In the article “Dismantling the Poverty Trap” Gilbert used more logic than she did emotion because she didn’t wanna make her point of view to seem like a sob story. She uses a lot of facts and information to back up her claim which makes us want to think that her article was more useful. She used a lot of examples for the high school dropouts, “High school dropouts from the ages of 16 to 24 were 63 times more likely to be institutionalized (either in prisons or more rarely, in mental institutions or hospitals) than four-year college graduates.”…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ontological argument is different than the cosmological or teleological arguments as it relies on A Priori knowledge rather than A Posteriori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that you can know prior to any experience; it is known through reason alone. This essay will explore how reliable the ontological argument is. The ontological argument is an argument for the existence of god by St Anselm (1033-1109). Anselm defined god as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.”…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most interesting topics in philosophy is the concern about the existence of God. Most of the time the way we perceive this theory can affect how we view the world and how we behave. Therefore, to discuss this topic there are three major arguments that attempt to show the existence of God. They are known as ontological argument, cosmological argument and theological argument.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zayd Boucaud Professor Sarah Allen Philosophy December 4, 2017 "Cleanthes' Argument from Design" This essay will divulge into the deeper meaning of Cleanthes’ argument from design, with an explanation of not only his views, but the opposition’s as well (with a further understanding about why his argument may be proven invalid.) Cleanthes’ premises (leading to his valid conclusion) will have further, more simple explanations that will show his own reasoning in favor of God’s existence.) Flaws in his argument will be displayed subsequently, which will lead to the conclusion of his argument overall: ample validity but simply lacking soundness.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What are the strengths of the teleological argument? The teleological argument is an a posteriori style of argument, also known as an empirical argument which uses the evidence using observations of the world through the five senses to argue the existence of God. The argument is based on an interpretation of teleology in which purpose or telos appear to exist in nature. The teleological argument suggests that, given this premise, the existence of a designer can be assumed, typically presented as God.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument Anselm creates the Ontological argument with one primary goal. He claims to succeed in developing an argument of the existence of God without the requirement of actual proof. Anselm 's reasoning and argument only gives a mere opinion on the topic of the existence of God. He formulates a two part hypothesis consisting of: God exists and God has always existed. Anselm’s Ontological argument expresses accusations that are simply in his favor or his outlook on God.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By making observations it will lead you to a conclusion most of the time. Inductive reasoning also has its weaknesses. One of them are the fact that it is very limited. You might think with the observations you did your conclusions must be certain but by simply making further observations you can now prove those old conclusions wrong. That is also why there is aways changes in many scientific conclusions, other people just observe further and prove old conclusions are wrong.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In contrast, inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. From many observations, a pattern is discerned, a generalization is made, and an explanation or theory is inferred. It is often a prediction from the past about the future. From many observations, a person is able to interpret facts to support his or her theories. If a person uses experience or reason, they can justify their beliefs to get to…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3.8. DEDUCTIVE RESEARCH “A deductive approach is concerned with developing a hypothesis (or hypotheses) based on existing theory, and then designing a research strategy to test the hypothesis” (Wilson, 2010:7) Monette et al (2005: 34) further explains deductive approach by the means of hypotheses, which can be derived from the propositions of the theory. In other words, deductive approach is concerned with deducting conclusions from premises or propositions. “Deduction begins with an expected pattern that is tested against observations, whereas induction begins with observations and seeks to find a pattern within them” (Babbie, 2010: 52). Is has been stated that “deductive means reasoning from the particular to the general.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays