Individualism In Society

Better Essays
The United States of America is the land of the free, the land of opportunity, the wealthiest country in the world, a country that half the modern world is modeled after. Its President is referred to as the "Leader …show more content…
In order to prevent tyranny, then, keeping arms and practicing their use had to be a civic duty and a legally protected individual right. They believed a widely-exercised individual right to keep arms was necessary as a civic function, for the good of society as a whole, and of course believed that people with arms, like anyone else, were subject to law, to civilization, and to basic rules of behavior, and had duties as citizens to protect each other's freedom and safety. However, these were obligations whose existence did not depend on the particular government that the people had chosen. In fact, the government was subject to these things just as much as individuals were. Individualism taken too far could undermine democracy and make society vulnerable to despotism.

The passions of men and their Intellectual life would be substantially modified by democracy. Under pressure from individual autonomy, opinions would be relativized, mores softened. Public opinion becomes the
…show more content…
Thus, they developed a system of
"checks and balances" to prevent any one of the three separate branches of the government from becoming dominant. The checks and balances included in the Constitution ensure that the government will never become too centralized. Thus, it is obvious that the very foundation upon which this nation was constructed, the Constitution, blocks any of the three branches from dominating the other two. And while it is true that government has become more centralized than the framers of the Constitution had probably planned, it is still far from the monarchy of England. The Separation of
Powers devised by the framers of the Constitution was designed to do one primary thing: to prevent the majority from ruling with an iron fist. For example, the President appoints judges and departmental secretaries. But these appointments must be approved by the Senate. The Congress can pass a law, but the President can veto it. The Supreme Court can rule a law to be unconstitutional, but the Congress, with the States, can amend the
Constitution. Individualism breeds fragmentation and brings about disconnectivity and this is in complete contradiction with the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    And those three are the reason to prevent the government from overpower. Without them, it will lead to chaos, and nobody makes a decision. The states end up with power and create their own country. The Supreme Court should have the power of judicial review and overturn the unconstitutional federal law because it reviews the actions of the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch to see if…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They had created the Constitution, but the had one question. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Tyranny by definition is a person or group from having or getting too much power. They made the constitution prevents this tyranny by having four major ideas. Those ideas are federalism, Separation of powers, checks and balances, and finally equal representation in congress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    III" and he goes on to note that that the framers stressed the separateness of the branches, as opposed to their independence. The majority in this case is primarily concerned that allowing the President to possess an unqualified ability to classify information would place him outside of the rule of law, and therefore outside the scope of either Congress or the court. Such a pernicious privilege would necessarily contravene the balance of power in the federal government, creating an Executive that could not be…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court can check Congress by stating that a law unconstitutional. The power is balanced by the fact that the Supreme Court members are appointed by the president and those appointments have to be approved by Congress. This process is affective but it is hard to amend because America has only one constitution. This is known as the checks and balances systems; this is the ways the Framers ensure that the power will not completely fall into the hands of one government, that no branch has the ultimate power over the other two. For example, in our current law, the congress makes the law, the president has the power the power to approve it, do nothing, or veto it; the congress ca again overrides it by 1/3 of majority vote.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unfair, cruel ruling and no freedom, how would you like to have a government that follows these set of rules? This is what it would be like to have tyranny in the United States government. This is what it would be like without the creation of the constitution.The first guard against tyranny was federalism, which is federal, state and local government. Another protection against tyranny was separation of powers which made three main branches of government, judicial ,executive and legislative. One of the last guards against it is checks and balances which makes sure the different branches are using their power correctly and if they’re not then the others can check them for it.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The system prevents tyranny by allowing each of the three branches to not only have power over themselves but to have power over the other branches. In case of a branch becoming too powerful the other branches can check the power to ensure equal power between the three branches. For example, if the president (Executive Branch) were to veto a law that the Legislative Branch felt was needed they could override the president’s veto to ensure that the president doesn’t get to powerful and do away with a good law. As stated by James Madison the system of checks and balances main role is to “divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other” (James Madison Federalist Paper #51, 1788). In addition to this James Madison also quotes that the three branches “have no constitutional control over each other” (James Madison Federalist Paper #51, 1788).…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Similar to other democratic nations, The United States has the Constitution to help protect citizens and their rights. However, the reason they are reluctant to ratify treaties is due to Article II and VI. These two articles are written in a way that make ratifying treaties difficult and unappealing. Article II is written so that the President can only make Treaties with the consent of two-thirds of the Senate. Similarly, Article VI would cause treaties to trump national law, giving them the same status of power as the Constitution (U.S constitution).…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For this case, Obama’s administration stand for executive branch passed a bill but it haven’t went through an approval of The Supreme Court- judicial branch and discus by the Congress. Separation of Power always go with Check and Balance, which is “based upon the philosophy of Baron de Montesquieu. In this system the government was to be divided into three branches of government, each branch having particular power.” “Not only does each branch of the government have particular powers each branch has certain powers over the other branches. This is done to keep them balanced and to prevent one branch form ever gaining too much power.” North Carolina have used this to sue again Court. And The Court can’t tell North Carolina to accept the law unconditional even though North Carolina still obey all the laws of Federal.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believed that the Constitution would prevent a monarchy and/or a tyranny. Column 2, box 5 of the “Positions of the Constitution” paper states that “The Powers of the national government are separated and balanced…The Constitution gives the Congress and the Supreme Court ways to check the use of power by the executive branch.” This shows that the citizens did not need to fear a monarchy because checks and balances would prevent it. All of the branches would be equal and have ways to keep each other in line. Another argument of the Federalists was that the central government had little power and this power can only be used to help the people. Column 2, box 3 of the “Positions of the Constitution” paper says “[the government's] powers are limited to tasks that face the entire nation, such as trade, currency, and defense.” These problems were not addressed in the Articles of Confederation and caused confusion.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They implemented several anti-majority rules such as the electoral college system, a bicameral legislature and the judicial review process in order to safeguard minority rights and prevent “tyranny by the majority”. By creating the electoral college system, the founders ensured that the election of the president was not directly decided by majority vote but rather by well-informed representatives elected by the people This system would prevent the selection of the president based on the whims of people, allow less populous states to have a voice, and strengthen the concept of federalism, the sharing of powers between state and national government. The creation of a bicameral national legislature, a Congress composed of two separate chambers, the Senate and the House of Representatives, also eliminated future rule by the majority. In designing the republic, framers opted to have the House of Representatives elected directly by the people while senators would be elected solely by the state legislatures. While larger states desired representation based on population in order to have more power, smaller, less populous states wanted equal representation so that they would not be ruled by the majority.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays