An Analysis Of J. S. Mill's Fiddler On The Roof

Improved Essays
Joseph Stein’s novel, Fiddler on the Roof, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of following tradition. While the main character strictly adheres to custom, J.S. Mill, in his book On Liberty, contradicts the general theme presented in Stein’s novel. Mill promotes the idea of individualism from society and, more importantly, from custom. Through his use of language, imagery, and the Harm Principle, Mill argues for individualism in a stagnant society. Originally, Mill’s essay On Liberty appears wordy and full of repetition; however, it is this use of repetition which aids in proving his point of individualism. As a cautious writer, Mill explores not only his argument about society’s control over an individual, but also the counterargument. …show more content…
First, the “inward domain of consciousness (Mill 11)” repels the general norm of conformity. It inspires human persons to possess their own thoughts, feelings, and opinions rather than pursue the customary traditions. Closely following is the idea of “liberty of tastes and pursuits (Mill 12).” Mill’s Harm Principle encourages people to broaden their goals in life beyond the restrictions and traditions of society. Lastly, his Principle acknowledges the idea the individual “follows the liberty, within the same limits, of combination among individuals; freedom to unite for any purpose not involving harm to others (Mill 12).” Mill believes society should allows individuals to do whatever they believe is in their best interest as long as it causes no harm to others. For example, young women today who become pregnant before they are ready to be a mother discover themselves following the social belief in abortion. The child, while just a fetus at the time, is still alive as a human being. By having an abortion performed, the women is allowing the abortionist to harm-- to kill-- the baby growing inside her. Based off Mill’s Harm Principle, this social custom is one in which he would advocate for an individual to rebel against. Mill’s Harm Principle correlates with the idea of living life as an individual and choosing to follow one’s own beliefs without harming others in

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In his piece, Thomas Paine strongly expresses a persuasive outlook as to why the colonists should fight for their independence. He believes that their willing right to be free shall not be put aside and that their abilities to achieve their freedom may be affected by factors such as God, the British, or even just simply the fact that Paine described the reasoning to get the colonists to fight in such an expressive way. Throughout this piece, Paine’s goal was to persuade the colonists to strive for liberty. To support his argument, Paine utilizes religious beliefs, descriptive language, and the recognition of the counter argument. To begin with, the author points to religious beliefs to demonstrate the relation God has on the colonists…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America and various selections in Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Antislavery Writings (specifically, his “Address on the Emancipation of the Negroes in the British West Indies,” “The Fugitive Slave Law,” “The President’s Proclamation,” his “Lecture on Slavery,” and lastly his “Address to the Citizens of Concord on the Fugitive Slave Law”) discuss the deleterious effects of conformity on the American mind, and on society as a whole. Both authors discuss the relationship between majority tyranny and slavery in the United States. Upon analyzing Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America and Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Antislavery Writings, it is clear that the authors agree on the effects of majority tyranny and slavery…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, if a person causes “harm” to another person, society may step in and dole out punishment as it sees fit (2002, p. 10). These two principles together construct Mill’s harm principle. Plato, however, believes an individual…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ends don’t always justify the means. Mill also believes in free will which has its issues. People can’t be trusted, because if people were given complete freedom to decide how and when to act in attaining greater good, they would all be selfish. People would act on selfish reasons and justify their actions as if they were for the greater good.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fresh from the sting of England’s strict rule colonial America established itself with cries of freedom and liberty. The ‘American dream’ is an often debated term- generally believed to encourage entrepreneurship, tolerance and liberty. While debated, the mark of a country’s intentions can be seen in whom they respect or whom they deem to be important or relevant. Colonial America struggled to adhere to their desire for freedom. What seemed a black and white definition was in actuality only favorable to a select few.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and Contrast Essay Liberty is a thing some people strive for and a thing people take for granted, Americans must decide how or how not to use their liberty . In Learned Hand’s “I am an American Day Address” and Langston Hughes’ “Let America Be America Again” both authors address the liberty of Americans; however they interpret the situation differently. The two writings have some similarities and some differences; both help people to understand the topic of liberty and what that means for Americans. The two writings have the same goal and that is to explain liberty to Americans.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the eighteenth century, whenever the thought of freedom of speech aroused, one common name appeared, Thomas Paine. He supported the cause so much, that he wrote several pieces about why it is important, but his last piece proved his belief. During this time religion was an important topic and while he was being held in a prison in France, he wrote What I Believe. It focused on his religious beliefs, the belief in a God, but not a church. Thomas Paine says that he does believe in a God.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Its ideal is negative rather than positive; passive rather than active; Innocence rather than Nobleness; Abstinence from Evil, rather than energetic Pursuit of Good: in its precepts (as has been well said) "thou shalt not" predominates unduly over "thou shalt."” (On Liberty, Chapter II) For Mill the true Christian doctrine was never fully explored by a majority of its followers and was an institution that pushed its members away from active truth seeking. For this reason he did not believe that it was developing individuals in the correct…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    19th Century advocate for the cause of women’s suffrage, Susan B. Anthony, delivered a speech in 1873 following her conviction for the crime of voting. Anthony’s purpose is to argue that the treatment of women during the 19th Century was unjust and unconstitutional. She adopts a respectful and candid tone in order to address the sexism and prejudicial views of society. Anthony uses rhetorical devices in her speech in order to appeal to her audience’s sense of unity and human compassion.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If there was to be one constant, one thing that can characterize freedom across the American story, it is the simple notion of changing one's destiny, free from influence or coercion, the ability to make a choice and to have the possibility to act on that decision. To prove this statement true, we must link the idea with examples from different eras and periods in American history. Firstly, the Revolutionary War, and the break from the traditional monarchy colony dynamic. Secondly, the Civil War, and the eventual passing abolition legislation. Lastly, the women's suffrage culmination in the 19th Amendment .…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention,” he talks about the reasons why Great Britain should be removed of their authoritative powers, and give colonial America independence from tyranny, which is because of restrictive binds the British tyrants weigh down upon the colonial government. Patrick Henry reinstates the American passion of obtaining freedom from the presence of tyranny through his use in antithesis, metaphor, and rhetorical questioning, thus instilling the value of independence to his audience in the Virginia House of Burgesses. As aware as Patrick Henry is about many economic situations, he explains what he is willing to do to attain his goal which, is to take “… [The] course others may [not] take;……

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Racial Contract” depicts Charles Mills’ radical perspective on racism as the foundation of the social contract. The core of Locke’s political thought is exposed, heavily linked to domination and exploitation. Racial roots of the social contract evoke global division and the existence of full/sub-persons. Mills rejects and challenges Locke’s conventional contract theory by acknowledging racism as the linchpin of the social contract, rather than an unintended consequence of imperfect man. His critique recognizes covert power roots of racism within the political system that, formally and informally dictate socioeconomic privileges.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays