Individualism In A Tale Of Two Cities

“If you don’t like your destiny, don’t accept it. Instead, have the courage to change it the way you want it to be.” -Masashi Kishimoto. Two paths begin in similar direction, but depending of the creator, can split into hundreds of different directions, each with its own destiny. The string of human fate is something no one is willing to believe can be predicted accurately, because of the twists and knots of a world that is beyond the simpleness of human comprehension. Whatever age or intelligence, we get lost and scared, unsure of what we desire and what we are suppose to do. It’s ingrained our brains to gather comrades in these situation and one of the greatest examples is during the French Revolution. There was no individualism, mobs had grown into one …show more content…
These “heros” have been overwhelmed with certain misfortune, for one it was the cause of others ,for the other it was self-inflicted. Charles Dickens develops two characters with the potential to be “heros” within their given community, Charles Darnay and Sydney Carton, they depict two potential torchbearers of the optimist citizens attempting to withstand the horrific success of rioting citizens during the French Revolution. Mobs became a staple of the French Revolution along with the entertainment of public executions, Charles Dickens introduces Charles Darnay in a scene that that conveys a comparison between the composed Darnay and the eerily eager, bloodthirsty mob. Before the trial begins, Dickens has two characters talking about the next case, one talks about what the sentence will be which has the other asking if the prisoner was found guilty already, the first man reassures him the other that the prisoner will be found guilty. The rumor of the next court case that spread like wildfire throughout the streets had finally come to