The Struggle Between Mark Zuckerberg And The Social Network

Great Essays
Due to the recent election, many citizens have begun to speak out and protest against the results. As a consequence of Donald Trump’s victory, the country has arguably become more polarized than ever. Upon Trump 's victory, non-Trump supporters started to channel their rage and confusion and began storming out in protest. These people began to fight back against the result and consequently they began to protest their own government. Were they right to do so? The justification of their actions is interesting because the answer one gives in response can also be seen as a statement of how they view their ideal society. Is it better for people to fight for what believe in or is it better for them to submit in the name of peace? If one sides with …show more content…
The film follows protagonist Mark Zuckerberg as he begins a series of events that would eventually lead him to become the world’s youngest billionaire. The film is basically a bio-flick of Zuckerberg’s rise to fame and success, however, the film also shows that his journey was not a pleasant one. The film shows the struggles that Zuckerberg and the company faced as it became a worldwide social media phenomena. These struggles include lawsuits, issues within company management, and interestingly enough the film also depicts the personal struggle that Zuckerberg faced in the early years of the company. As the film progress, the audience begins to learn more and more about Zuckerberg’s self-centered attitude and individualistic actions. From act one to act three it is very apparent that Zuckerberg is a person who will do whatever it takes to stay on top even if that means cutting ties and performing underhanded tactics. In the climax of the film, the audience sees how Zuckerberg ruthlessly cuts ties with his friend and co-creator Eduardo Saverin by diluting Saverin’s stock from 30% to 0.03%. Zuckerberg’s individualistically driven actions were indeed a contributing factor to his success but they were also as De Tocqueville feared the cause of his eventual isolation. The height of his seclusion is seen at the end of the film, having cut ties with many of his original co-creators and friends Zuckerberg sits alone anxiously waiting to receive a friend request confirmation from his ex-girlfriend. It is clear that while an individualistic society is one that promotes the celebration of one’s self and one’s desires, it is not an ideal society as the self-centered nature of individualism can lead to selfish actions and eventually isolation from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Malcom X, an American Muslim Minister and rights activist, once said that “You are not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you cannot face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it.” He is speaking of a term called civil disobedience, the active refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of the government, or of an occupying international power. Civil disobedience is used by influential “rebels” all over the world and throughout history. Many people have different opinions on whether civil disobedience is important or not. It is important for people to take a stand when injustice occurs because some people may not be able to stand up for what they believe in, if people choose to stand up for what they believe in they…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history and even to the present day, the government has made laws that didn’t always please everyone. Laws, taxes, tariffs, bans, they were all created to place boundaries on citizens and even government officials. Some historical court cases violated the rights that citizens obtained in the bill of rights and the constitution. Peaceful resistance, in my opinion, benefits the society more than it causes disruptions.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay entitled “George Orwell…Meet Mark Zuckerberg”, Lori Andrews discusses the malicious power of data aggregation and targeted advertising, and its immorality. She highlights the dangers of companies tailoring to specific demographics, and through her writing style, attempts at building trust with her readers. Andrews argues that the techniques used in targeted advertising and data aggregation are immoral, however she employs similar tactics to make her point. Andrews caters to a specific audience using jargon, as well as personal appeal to shock the technologically inexperienced with burdensome truths.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people are discontent with the United States government. Ironically, the very same peoples’ actions often contradict their extensive complaints. An innumerable number tend to sit around and whine that things could be better while playing the role of spectators. They act as though they are watching a stage performance; they clap when the show is going well, and boo when it is not to their satisfaction, instead of participating in the show to add improvements. Peaceful resistance is frequently overlooked, but can prompt favorable changes in a society.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To begin, there is always a reason for protesting no matter what it is. First there what a bombing performed by the United States military on Cambodia. The bombing was an expansion of the vietnam war into Cambodia, which caused outrage on the citizens of United States. Across the country, there were protests by students on college campuses, universities, and high schools. Overall, the protests attracted over four million students and over four hundred fifty universities and high schools. From all the protest, in Ohio at Kent State University, national guards showed up to the campus to end the protest there. The guards executed their plan to silence the protester. Sadly, there was a horrible occurrence caused by the military that outraged students.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the history of human civilization, there have been countless times where the people of a nation needed to stand up for what is right to protect their freedoms, whether it be through war or peace. Millions of people have protested unjust laws, gone to war against tyrannical governments, and fought for the freedom of themselves and others. And in the modern day, as news spreads globally faster than ever before, people are always hearing about injustices, whether they be oppression of free speech in China, oppression of immigrants in America, or oppression of homosexuality in the Middle East. One method that people have devised to help stem the tide of injustices and oppression is to engage in civil disobedience, which is an activity where…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, fighting causes people to lose their lives. In 2012, Egyptians demonstrated against the government after the president announced that he had full power. There was a large clash between the protesters and dozens of people were killed and hundreds were injured. The idea to protest is logical, but people should not die from violence from having conflicting ideas. Also, violence fails to bring about a change to help create equal rights. For example, in Venezuela, people protested in April 2017 to re-establish an elected government with a powerful National Assembly and for the government to allow humanitarian aid into the country. In response, the government did not change, and instead Venezuelan official sources report that people participate in pro-government rallies, where some sing and dance “in defense of peace”. Tensions rose and a seventeen year old boy was killed, but the rally did not change anything. On the other hand, using nonviolent methods can cause progress to be made. Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist, collected data on violent and nonviolent political campaigns since 1900, and she found that nonviolence succeeds 73% of the time, while violence was successful 33% of the time. Using nonviolence allows other people to perceive the issue; they will then be more likely to act, rather than if they are afraid or acting defensively from the brutality. Violence should only be a last resort because…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the course of history, numerous citizens have practiced peaceful resistance, also referred to as civil disobedience. Interestingly enough, the terms used to label the action of defying one’s government in a nonviolent way contradict themselves completely. The word civil typically refers to the commonwealth of a nation or state while the word disobedience strikingly insinuates that laws will be broken. This incongruity parallels the concept that peaceful resistance produces both favorable and undesirable outcomes, but ultimately, as seen in free societies such as the United States, the positive products typically outweigh the negative.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People do not band together against their government because they do not respect it and it is not often that one person rallies a group of people in order to achieve their own goals in a free society. Both of these situations and more are hypothetical and only take into account a pessimistic view of human nature. Civil rights leaders such as Dr. Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi were not selfish people who protested in order to get what they want, rather they strove to get what oppressed groups of people desperately needed and desired- to be treated as equally as their White brethren. This is far from a selfish request. After the Civil Rights Movement, the United States became a better country and free society. It is also important to remember the American colonists’ civil disobedience in response to the English government’s tyranny. The colonists protested because they wanted to change a law that they knew was unfair. This is the purpose of civil disobedience in a free society, to appeal to a higher authority to change what the people believe is in need of revision or…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference is the people who decide who chooses which option to go with; do they choose violence or do they choose peace (Thoreau). Not only does it rest on the shoulders of the people protesting, but it also depends on the situation. If the use of peaceful rebellions are just a way to continue an immoral practice -- such as police violence, racism, or to support personal gains -- then perhaps it should not be done. King even admits “But now I must affirm that it is just as wrong, or perhaps even more so, to use moral means to preserve immoral ends (King 293).” The use of any type of force -- whether peaceful or violent -- may not affect the situation or it may even lead to the continuation of wrongful acts. If this was to continue, then perhaps the people who would decide to fight against the immoral actions should find another way to combat it. Another reason that civil disobedience could be used, but probably should not is if every single person were to try and protest each minute issue, then deciding what would be important to change could result in not having any change at all (Thoreau). When a governing body is overtaxed, it has to decide which issues are more timely and which are not. Overstimulating the governing bodies with requests -- while peaceful -- could result in hazardous…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people use peaceful resistance, they are more likely to achieve their goal, because people can focus on what they are saying instead of the actions that they are using to get their point across. Peaceful resistance is also successful at getting attention because people have subtle boycotts. If a huge group of people decide to peaceful resist going to Walmart, then Walmart will lose a huge number of customers, and need to listen to how to satisfy what their customers want. The government is the same way, if people peacefully resist something in the government, the government will have to listen because a free society is suppose to be ran off of what is best for its people. Peaceful resistance is also more likely to gain followers that violent resistance because people tend to be scared of violence and do not want to get caught up in that kind of action. With groups that have come to power with peaceful resistance, they are much more respected than those who have come to power with non-peaceful resistance. People tend to appreciate peaceful resistance, it shows maturity and dedication instead of just lashing out because you do not agree with something or…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another person who inspired people to protest peacefully was Henry David Thoreau who, in 1792 said, ”The government is best which governs least.” Thoreau wrote the books “Civil Disobedience.” The most ineffective and substantial march, a positive form of protest against our president elect’s inauguration, was the women’s march, that 4.8 million participated worldwide. More recently, Muhammad Ali said “Don’t give up, suffer now and live your life a legend.” Ali was thrown into jail because he refused to get drafted, he did not believe in the war and what it stood…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a world full of different perspectives, each view has one vantage point that another one doesn’t, but in this questioning of peaceful disobedience, the meshed perspective of both the optimist and the realist provide the best angle to enforcing the claim that peaceful civil resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. To quote both Muhammad Ali and Rosa Parks in doing what they believe is right despite the overarching laws, sometimes it is necessary to stand up and say…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie describes and analyses how the company grew and then collapsed quickly and surrounded by a gigantic scandal that can be seen as pride but also as arrogance, intolerance and greed.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facebook Case Study

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 30 Works Cited

    This can be defined as affiliation, “the basic need for the company of others” (Dwyer, 2000). Based on Dwyers findings, this could be reflected in the actions on Facebook as although an individual may appear to be in a social situation, if when they log in to the site day after day and find that no one has made contact with them it could feel as if they are in a form of cyber solitary confinement. Dwyer states that solitary confinement is one of the greatest punishments one could inflict on another (2000) so the same could be said for Facebook confinement, but in metaphorical terms, looking through the window on what others are up to by surveying their social interaction. If a friend / acquaintance (which seems to be the case in many circumstances as Dunbar discovered (in Lewis & West 2009) that we only actually interact with 5 out of our (on average) 150 friends in the offline world. However this framework can be applied to the online Facebook world as the average user has 130 friends (Facebook, 2010b). Book- friendship rules –JEALOUSY seeing others.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 30 Works Cited
    Improved Essays