Indian Removal Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Indian removal was a conflict between the five civilized tribes, Creek, Chickasaw, Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, and the white settlers. The conflicts between both sides happened for many years but the Indian Removal Act was passed in 1830. Some Indian tribes lived in the Louisiana territory, but the five civilized tribes in the American settler territories. The reasons for the tribes to have to move was white settlers wanted more land to have control over.

The Indians view of land is different than the Americans. They saw land as an area that can never be owned by a person or persons. Indians mostly used land ownership as a place for gathering of tribes or as a place for hunting. Americans saw land as an area that can be owned by a person. To Americans if you owned land then you had to utilize it whether that be by cultivating it, clearing it, or improving said land. Along with utilizing land in Americans minds if you really owned land then you must be willing to defend it with your life. Because of Americans different view of land it cause a major problem with the Indians population. Indians population
…show more content…
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 already gave the president the power to do pretty much anything with the Indians in order to get them out of their land, but it had to be done in a way to where no harm is caused to the Indians. In his speech he states that he needs to move the savages in order to “end all possible danger.” He says that using the Indians territory will assist the Americans with rapid population growth, power, and wealth. Jackson states that Indians must drop all savage habits and become more civilized. He states that their treaties the government has created a complete understanding of what their true conditions are. He says that a speedy removal is the best, safest way to be rid of all the evil and threat that the Indians tribes

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Whereas, Jackson wrote, “On Indian Removal” to persuade Congress that the American Indians should relocate: “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson Removal Thesis

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Jackson defended his stand by asserting that removal was the only course of action that could save the Native Americans from extinction. Jackson's attitude toward Native Americans was patronizing, describing them as children in need of guidance and believed the removal policy was beneficial to them. To congressional leaders, he assured them that his policies would enable the federal government to place the Indians in a region where they would be free of white encroachment and jurisdictional disputes between the states and the federal government. He asked congressional approval of his removal policy. Some of the people that were sitting in the government didn’t like the idea of Jackson and didn’t want to move the tribes from their lands, by…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Jackson’s view, why is a “speedy removal” good for the United States? It keeps the White people from having to fight with the Indians and allows them to take the land to develop it into something that will help America grow with the strengthening of the southwestern frontier. Why is it good for the Indians?…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Do you like being buried alive? This is one of the many horrible things the Cherokee Indians did to Americans. The Indian Removal Act moved lots of Indian tribes to a reserve, this got them out of the way so America could expand westward. All the Indian tribes signed the treaty and all of them moved but one, the Cherokee.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Expansion Dbq

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his message to Congress, President Jackson stated “The consequences of a speedy removal will be important to the United States, to individual States, and to the Indians themselves. The pecuniary advantages which it promises to the Government are the least of its recommendations. It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of the Indians. It will place a dense and civilized population in large tracts of country now occupied by a few savage hunters.” In this source, he argues the evacuation will stabilise their position with Indians, although the forced relocation became known as the “Trail of Tears” as it caused a 25% death rate for the tribes involved.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it wasn’t his intention to harm them nor was he the only President who believed removal was the only policy to protect Indians from annihilation. During the presidency of John Quincy Adams, it was apparent to the federal government that a policy of removal would have to be enacted to protect the Indians from impending attacks of the states. However, Adams was unable to…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They suffered sickness such as the whooping cough, typhus, dysentery, cholera and, starvation, these were all epidemics along the way. In this removal nearly 125,000 Native American Indians were forced to leave their ancestral lands that they had cultivated for generations. It included tribes such as the Choctaw, removed in 1831, was the first ejected and became the model for the removal. The Seminole were the second removed in 1832, the Creek in 1834, and then the Chickasaw in 1837 and, finally the Cherokee in 1838, these tribes collectively were referred to as the Five Civilized Tribes. Andrew Jackson continued and renewed the political and military effort for the removal of the Native Americans from these lands with the passage of the Indian Removal Act of…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That was the main problem for the native American’s during that time, the Americans would say they would allow the natives to have land at times but then suddenly go back on there word and push them off. In the…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Removal

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Indian Removal In 1976 Mr. Marvin J. Sonosky, Mr. Reid Chambers, and Mr. Harry Sachse established a Law Firm for the sole purpose of representing American Indian tribes. Sadly Mr. Sonosky passed away in July of 1997 due to heart failure. Mr. Chambers and Mr. Sachse continued his work and added partners to the Firm and continued to help and support American Indian Tribes (Reid Chambers & SCSE&P, LLP.) Growing up surrounded by people who have dedicated their lives to making other people’s lives better is in an insanely amazing way to grow up.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Indian removal act called for the removal of all Indians in the eastern part of the U.S to be moved westward beyond the Mississippi river to present day Oklahoma.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert V Remini Summary

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Remini says Jackson felt that the only solution for both the Unites States and the Native tribes was that they had to be removed. This attitude towards the Indians followed him into the White house when he was elected President in 1828. Of all the things Jackson accomplished during his presidency, his Indian Removal Act was most important. Jackson finally accomplished his long thought solution to the Indian problem. Today’s historians see this a cruel act against his seemingly long term enemy.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He gave the Indian tribes a message of peace as if he didn’t want to do anything against them, showing the peace between him and the Indian Tribes. Also in his Second Annual Message to Congress he stated "Toward the aborigines of the country no one can indulge a more friendly feeling than myself, or would go further in attempting to reclaim them from their wandering habits and make them a happy, prosperous people." By doing so, he conveyed that he had no intentions of harming the tribes and wanted to show his good intentions to them. By this time, the Indian Removal Act was slowly coming to a decision of being accepted or not, and even though he had been planning the removal, Jackson reassured the Indian tribes that it was to help rather than harm them, though in reality he was actually harming. For many years, the Indian tribes had lived on the American lands with their belief that the land didn’t belong to a single person but to everyone.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By the late seventeenth century, much of Native American land was considered to be controlled and owned by the English crown. The only way an Indian could own property was to get a land grant from the King (Cronon 70). Once a European settler owned land, they were encouraged to “…transform the soil by a property system that taught them to treat land as capital” (Cronon 77). Cronon states a very important aspect to European land ownership in that the owner of an area of land must improve it and tend to their property for the land remain in their custody. Since Native American homes were easily…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays