Indian Removal Policy Analysis

Great Essays
Register to read the introduction… They were brave and listened to the government, but they still lost their tribal land. During the 1830's the East coast was burdened with new settlers and becoming vastly populated. President Andrew Jackson and the government had to find a way to move people to the West to make room. He passed the Indian Removal Policy in1830. The Indian Removal Policy, which called for the removal of Native Americans from the Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, and the Georgia area. They also moved their capital Echota in Tennessee to the new capital called New Echota, Georgia and then they eventually moved to the Indian Territory. The Indian Territory was declared in the Act of Congress in 1830 with the Indian Removal Policy. The government of the United States did not really try all that hard to avoid the conflict even though they knew what kind of tragedy it would cause. According to President Andrew Jackson: "Humanity and national honor demand that every effort should be made to avert so great a calamity. It is too late to inquire whether it was just in the United States to include them and their territory within the bounds of the new States, whose limits they could control" (Filler 15).Elias Boudinot, Major Ridge, and John Ridge accepted the responsibility for the removal of the Cherokee, which was one of the largest tribes in the Southeast that were the earliest to adapt to European ways. There was …show more content…
The Tahlequah Agency in Oklahoma has said there were 42,992 Cherokee living in Tahlequah in 1982. The U.S. Census has shown 293,074 Cherokee are living in more than 30 states in the United States. Now the Cherokee Nation is under control of the first woman chief. In November 1983 Wilma Mankiller was elected to the office of the Cherokee Nation. The Cherokee survived the hardships of the Trail of Tears and the loss of their loved ones. Their population continues to grow despite losing everything that belonged to them (Bruchac …show more content…
A continual war existed between the Navajos and the New Mexicans, which eventually helped lead to the Navajo Long Walk. Apparently every time the Navajos signed a treaty, it was broken by the New Mexicans. In 1845, when the United Sates annexed Texas, they took possession of all of Mexico's Northern provinces. In August of 1946, Gen Stephen Kearney declared control over all citizens of the Territory of New Mexico, including Indian tribes. America thought that the Navajos would make a peace treaty binding all Navajos, but that was not the case. The Navajos were considered independent and if another province made a treaty, they would ignore it and continue to makes raids. The United States did not take this very well because if one Navajo committed a crime then the U.S. believed that all Navajos should be punished. The Americans totally took away the land that was rightfully theirs, but more importantly they took away their pride. "The Navajos fled before them, looking down from the heights above while there hohrahns went up in flames. All their horses and sheep were killed, the canyon floor was left bare, and the spirit of the Indians was broken" (Coolidge 25). Although the Long Walk of the Navajo caused fewer casualties than the Trail of Tears, it seems that it was more of a political issue involving a corrupt government. In today' word

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Perdue and Green’s “The Cherokee Removal, A Brief History with Documents” is an introduction to the social and political period surrounding the removal of Cherokee Indians. The authors’ inclusion of many documents, shares with readers, the Indian voices as well as key political figures’ position on sovereign governance. This complex period is successfully outlined by Perdue and Green, with a chronological account of the Indians’ first encounter with Europeans through the inevitable journey, “Trail of Tears”.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dbq Territorial Expansion

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It’s stated that the US government, “Responding to the clamoring of whites in Mississippi, Georgia and Florida, they uprooted the so-called five “Civilized Tribes” of the south, Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, Seminoles and Cherokees and moved them to western Oklahoma.” (Davis 49). Just a mere example of what the US was willing to do out of its own economic interests, the relocation of these tribes benefitted them because it allowed them to close conflicts in the south and get a better grip of control over them as US expands westward. The ability to move Natives was complemented by the attainment of land from the Louisiana Purchase. This territory gained from France was a major development in the movement across the central soon to be United States.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The white settlers had wanted the Native Americans land for farming. Jackson had decided to remove all Native Americans from their land. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, ordering all Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi River. The Five Civilized Tribes consists of The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Creek, and Chickasaw.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Treaties was one way the U.S. Government us to displace Indians from their land, the removal act of 1830 was a mechanism used to displace the Indians. Where this failed, the government broke the treaties and the court's ruling to spread the movement west. Americans flocked to the south, began moving toward into what would become Alabama and Mississippi. The Indian tribes living there created a problem to the expansion; white settlers petitioned the government to remove them President Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe wanted the tribes to trade their land for lands in the west. This did not happen the major transfer happen only because of war.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to further aggress the land seizures against the Cherokee, June 1st 1830, the Georgian government extended its lawful jurisdiction into Cherokee owned territory (58). This held Natives to Georgian law without the right of due process in court. Up until the election of Andrew Jackson, the state of Georgia and the Cherokee had a tug-of-war like battle over land rights. After Jackson’s election win, the federal government would begin to slowly take the side of the Georgians.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unexplored and deemed unsuitable for white settlement, these lands seemed perfectly suited for ridding the new nation of its Indian problem. Two such treaties were eventually negotiated and approximately one-third of the Cherokee population made the migration west by 1820. However, during the administrations of James Monroe and John Quincy Adams, the federal government adopted a more sympathetic policy towards the native tribes of the southeast, encouraging missionary efforts to "civilize" them, and recognizing more extensive rights of Indians over tribal lands.(Indian…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokees had a lot of pressure upon them about leaving the land. “The idea of Cherokees being civilized was not going to happen fully because of the new pattern of racist thought” (Green & Perdue, 15). The Cherokees were the most civilized Indian tribe, so they did not understand why they were being justified for removal for the American citizens. Andrew Jackson said “making treaties with the Indians was absurd, so the best way to get the land from the Cherokees was to just take the land” (Green & Perdue,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Dbq

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Looking back on history, it is now clear how devastating the removal of the Cherokee people was, but how did those involved view it? Based on the evidence provided, white Americans tended to view the removal policy in split opinions, while the Native Americans had a generally bad view of the policy. The Indian Removal policy caused for a stir of positive and negative opinions in the United States, by both the Cherokee nation and white Americans. The white perspective of the Indian removal was a generally accepting one, though more Americans preferred the idea of the Cherokee becoming citizens.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trail Of Tears Dbq

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Trail of Tears and Cold-Blooded Sufferings “I fought through the Civil War and have seen men shot to pieces and slaughtered by thousands, but the Cherokee removal was the cruelest work I ever knew.” Quoted by a Georgian militiamen during the gathering of Cherokee Indians, he describes how horrible this removal was on the Native Americans that once lived in the Cherokee Territory. (Document D) Once the Cherokee were rounded up, they were sent to travel the Trail of Tears to the west side of the Mississippi River. After traveling over the Mississippi, they were on the land given to them by the United States government which is today known as Oklahoma.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Ross was elected Principal Chief of the new Cherokee Nation in August 139. The Cherokee built a new capital Tahlequah in Oklahoma. The Cherokee leaders that had signed the New Echota Treaty were hunted and killed for treason. Even if all the Fives Civilized Tribes were removed by force from their original lands and lost many of their members, the Cherokees suffered the most because lost 4,000 people along the trail.…

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Possessed by "gold fever" and a thirst for expansion, many settlers turned on their Cherokee neighbors. The U.S. government ultimately decided it was time for the Cherokees to be "removed", leaving behind their farms, their land and their homes. In 1830, Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act, which granted Jackson the funds and authority to remove the Indians, by force if necessary, and promised the Indians a “safe” passage…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokee Indians had lived in the lands of what is now the United States for thousands of years before any colonists had ventured to their lands. Little did they know that the new nation that was going to be forming around them and would affect the lives of their descendents. Trail of tears is historically monumental because it…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays