Indian Removal Injustice

Improved Essays
In the long history of systematic and violent acts of injustice committed by the United States government against the indigenous peoples of America, perhaps no other effort can compare to the implementation and aftermath of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 for sheer sinister deliberation. By the end of the 1840s, an estimated 16,000 Cherokee indians were forced to leave their homes, 4,000 of whom died along the way from east of the Mississippi to Oklahoma (Teaching History.org, home of the National History Education Clearinghouse., n.d.). In the year 1828, Andrew Jackson swept the general election for the United States presidential office. It had been an utterly brutal campaign trail, characterized by vicious personal attacks between candidates unprecedented in American politics up until that time. A fierce populist, Jackson found thunderous support mostly from westerners and southern farmers. Jackson was seeking a benchmark for his presidency. At the time, the land that was currently occupied by the Cherokee nation in particular was noted for being excellent for agricultural purposes. Additionally, the general American populace held a …show more content…
This point is important because despite this, the general populace continued to characterize them as savages (The Trail of Tears — The Indian Removals, n.d.). The state of Georgia initially attempted to take the land away from the Cherokee via annexation, but the Cherokee people fought back by bringing the case to the United States Supreme Court. The Cherokee Nation won the case, but it didn’t matter; Jackson claimed authority over the Supreme Court, and despite the Cherokee’s peaceful efforts to resist blatant tyranny, the Cherokee people were nevertheless violently forced out of their homes, and made to travel to specific sections of land in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Indian Removal Dbq

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First, they had their own culture. Before the indian removal was passed, they created a world that they have their own language, printing press, and newspapers. They had a civilization, they had a government modeled after the U.S and they have their own constitution. They had order where they used to live But they already signed the indian removal act. But few of the tribes only agreed on this act so this act was not equal.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also to support this statement I saw in the article called ‘Indian Removal Map” all the Indian tribes that were forced to move. It shows you that there is 5 different tribes that were moved into Indian territory. Another thing about the Indian removal act was how the Indians felt after they were moved. They felt like they were barely living and wished they weren’t forced to move off their land.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Topic and Research Question Topic: For my historical event analysis, I have chosen to focus on The Cherokee "Trail of Tears" Research Question: How the Indian Removal Act of 1830 affected the Cherokee? Preliminary Writing Plan Introduction The historical analysis focuses on the topic is “The Cherokee Trail of Tears”; the topic is about a historical event that caused suffering and death of one of the tribes that are native in America. The Cherokee are among the Creeks, the Chickasaw, the Seminoles and the Choctaw who constituted the native tribes that assimilated and coped with the white settlers (United States Department of State, 2017).…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a large and populous country with over 300 million people spread out among the states, but it wasn’t always that way. In the 1830s the U.S government was struggling to expand its nation into the frontier. As a result, many people including Andrew Jackson and even Indians like Elias Boudinot found it necessary to move and push the Native Americans west. Jackson strongly believed that the Native Americans should move further west because it will save them from annihilation and will allow white settlers to use and find new land expanding America’s growth (Doc A). This shows how Jackson supported the native American removal because it benefited both people, the Native Americans and white settlers.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A cherokee Indian from the “Memorial of the Cherokee Nation,” describes the western land as badly supplied with food and water, unfamiliar cultures, and “wish to die” on this soil (Doc. K). Jackson forced the Indians to surrender their land and failed to provide any support in terms of food and other necessities for their westward migration. Because of the Indian’s utmost disenchantment, it is possible that they took their case to the Supreme Court. However, Jackson could have ignored that decision since he already had a majority vote in Congress to be condemned and impeached. Conjointly, Native Americans were gathered into similar places in the west.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Monetary awards were given to guides and supporters of the removal plan. Indians who resisted migration west were put into stockades for long periods of time, until the arrangement for removal began. “They are prisoners, without a crime to justify the fact”.5 Voices of Andrew Jackson, John Ridge, Lewis Cass, the Cherokee women, Evan Jones, Elias Boudinot and many more could not change the course of events happening to the Cherokee nation. The complexity of this time in history raises many concerns for the survival of the Native Americans. The authors posed many questions as to the actions and decisions of the Cherokees.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Andrew Jackson no doubt planned the removal of Indians for the benefit of the US. However, when he misled the Indians into thinking he did it for their sakes, he went against his own promises of peaceful relations and respect for the Native Americans. Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision in the Worcester vs Georgia case where the Cherokees’ sovereignty was established, and continued to badger them into moving without acknowledging their rights. In dealing with the Indians, Jackson neglected the Treaty of Tellico, a treaty established in 1805 that set clear boundaries between the US and Cherokees, and pushed them out of their own lands. Therefore, because of his unlawful actions in dealing with the Native…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cherokees had a lot of pressure upon them about leaving the land. “The idea of Cherokees being civilized was not going to happen fully because of the new pattern of racist thought” (Green & Perdue, 15). The Cherokees were the most civilized Indian tribe, so they did not understand why they were being justified for removal for the American citizens. Andrew Jackson said “making treaties with the Indians was absurd, so the best way to get the land from the Cherokees was to just take the land” (Green & Perdue,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It forced the Native Indians to surrender millions of acres of land and to move to west. Throughout the removal many Indians suffered through sickness and death. The Indian Removal Act not only removed the Indians from their rightful lands forcefully but also is responsible for over 4000 deaths of the Native Americans, that today is known as the ‘Trail of Tears’. Bibliography Calloway, Colin G. Kill the Indian and Save the Man 1870s-1920s. (In Bedford/St. Martin’s (Ed.), First Peoples: A Documentary Survey of American Indian History, 4th ed., 2012) 412-483.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But as the treaties were easily revocable and more often than not, revoked, without the consent of the Native tribes protected under them. “Indians are dealing with the magnamity of a rich and powerful nation, one that is not about to divest itself or its non-Indian citizens of large acreage in the name of its own laws. (Clifford, 284)” This land claim lawsuit was between the Mashpee Indians and the Federal Government. It shows how the ethnocentrism of the American nation overshadows any tiny Indian tribe deemed inferior. The Indian Removal Act, signed into laws by Andrew Jackson and congress in 1830 ratified an agreement to move all Native tribes west of the Mississippi in exchange for the lands they currently held.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson’s strongest conviction was that Native Americans would not become civilized, and although many other people of that time agreed, these opinions should not have given him popularity. “He shared the white Tennessean’s common opinion of Indians. As he saw it they were the festering sore that afflicted the settlers and limited the colonization of this great land, the progress of this newest and best nation on Earth, man’s hope for freedom from kings and dukes and tyrants and priests…” Jackson wrongly encouraged views of Native Americans like those above, showing that he was a strong racist. Moreover, “Cherokee: a blob of forests, burnt-off fields, and raging streams with savages robbing travelers and, often enough, torturing them to death. That was Cherokee to him.”…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom Definition

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian removal itself shows how people will manipulate freedom to benefit from the outcome, which in this case is the land that Indians occupied. The act forcefully encouraged established Indian societies east of the Mississippi to abandon the comfort of their homes and lives in order to move west of the Mississippi. The Cherokee in Georgia are a great example of a stable Indian society where they felt their social independence allowed them access to social freedom sans interference from whites. (Lecture 11-8) Andrew Jackson and his Indian Removal Act disregarded the social freedoms that were already given to and claimed by the Native Americans who had assimilated into the white culture desired by Americans. Even tribe leaders who made a concerted effort towards “civilization” did not suffice as enough reason for Jackson to abandon the inhumane act of relocation.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays