Indian Removal Act Analysis

Improved Essays
On January of 1827, a Congressional report stated “that the House Committee on Indian Affairs be instructed to inquire into the expediency of providing by law for the removal of the Florida Indians.” This became an important turning point in federal government policy of moving away from encouraging the Seminoles to move to the Florida, and instead to force migration to the west of the Mississippi. Among the rationalizations discussed before the introduction of the proposal were that the Indian Territory would supply the Seminoles with more game to hunt, and better soil for cultivation.
While no new federal treaty would be negotiated until 1832, the Florida Legislature in 1827 passed a decree to further persuade the Seminoles to comply with the Moultrie Creek Treaty. The decree stated “that any male Indian found out of the reservation ‘shall receive not exceeding thirty-nine stripes on his bare back, and his gun
…show more content…
The governor used the pretense of Indians’ susceptibility to diseases through constant contact with other different Europeans, while removal far away would accomplish this. The United States’ enactment of the Indian Removal Act was mostly in place to open up lands for white settlers and prevent Indian and African American uprisings and forcing Indians to move west of the Mississippi River. The Act also sought to prevent Indians from harboring fugitive slaves. One of the decisive factors in Seminole resistance was the presence and the peculiar position of the Blacks among the Indians. Some of the Black Seminoles, such as Abraham, former slave and interpreter, were recent runaways from servitude among the Whites. Black Seminoles feared that attempts by the Indians to leave Florida with them would cause white slave owners to reclaim their human property including long-time freed

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Indian Removal Dbq

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First, they had their own culture. Before the indian removal was passed, they created a world that they have their own language, printing press, and newspapers. They had a civilization, they had a government modeled after the U.S and they have their own constitution. They had order where they used to live But they already signed the indian removal act. But few of the tribes only agreed on this act so this act was not equal.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Florida Seminole War

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Indian raids were being reported all throughout the state and the lack of a sizeable force was detrimental in helping to deter Indian strikes. The American government was actively trying to compose agreement with the Florida Indians to relocate their tribe to unused areas in Florida in hopes to avoid future conflict between both groups. The Treaty of Payne’s landing was an early attempt at peaceful agreements between Seminoles and the American government but many Seminoles felt they were exploited in this agreement by irresponsible chiefs who agreed to the terms and double-dealing interpreters who cared little for their best interest. The U.S government would appoint Wiley Thompson to be the Indian agent in Florida ad help resolve the states Indian issue. He would go on to enrage the local Seminoles through his deceitful practices and continual support of the Payne’s landing treaty.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1838 and 1839 the Trail of Tears was one of the most devastating events in American history. The Trail of Tears was a forced movement of the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, Cherokee, and Seminole tribes to the west of the Mississippi river. The Indian Removal Act and the Treaty of New Echota are the major causes of the Trail of Tears, which resulted a major decrease in the Indian population due to the massive amount of deaths. The Indian Removal Act was passed by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal: Is it justified? The Act of Removal of the Cherokee Indians was a rough era in history. The Removal of the Indians happened because the citizens of Georgia wanted to mine on their land. The Cherokee Indians had refused to let them mine on their land because the land belonged to the legally and they were not going to let some strangers come and take their land away from them. How would you like it if someone came into your house and told you to leave?…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This action caused the Indians to suffer, and many of them died along the way. Jackson’s message to congress regarding the Indian removal explained that many Indian tribes were becoming extinct and asked congress to consider setting aside territory west of the Mississippi specially for the Indians (Doc. J). This proposal was used to solely benefit the eastern territory to benefit farmers and working men by opening up lands. Jackson benefitted himself economically at a cost, which was removing the Indians from the territory without their consent, proving his egotistical behavior. Correspondingly, responses from the Cherokee tribe verified Jackson’s injustice.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the arrival of the Europeans in America, The native Indians had been under a lot of pressures. Acculturation, broken treaties, assimilation and removal policies had a few, if any, positive impacts on the Native Americans. The purpose of this paper is about the Indian removal policies that was created by an American president Andrew Jackson. In the development of this research, the removal of the Cherokees to land west of the Mississippi will be the center of attention . It’s important to know what motivate Andrew Jackson, to evict the Cherokees from their own land, and how the Cherokees react to that matter.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1836, the government drove the Creeks from their land for the last time. 3,500 of the 15,000 Creeks who set out for Oklahoma did not survive the trip. Some Cherokees wanted to stay and fight for their land but some agreed and left their land. The Treaty of New Echota which traded al Cherokee land east of the Mississippi for $5 million, relocation assistance and compensation for lost property. To the federal government, the treaty was a done deal.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1830, Jackson put forth The Indian Removal Act, which proposed that all of the Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west, into Indian Territory. Through this, Jackson believed that he was helping the Indians because in his opinion, having settlers and Indians living in close proximity was not beneficial to either group (“Indian Removal Act” 1). This Act was controversial because many Native American tribes were already promised land, which they were now being forced to leave (“Indian Removal Act” 2). The Cherokee Indian tribes living in Georgia were strongly against the Indian Removal Act due to a treaty with the state claiming that they could keep their land as long as they wanted if they assimilated into American culture (O’Brien 3). The Cherokee tribes had kept their end of the treaty by speaking English and sending their children to schools, but the state of Georgia wanted the land because they had found gold there and the land was fertile for growing cotton.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indians may leave the State or not, as they choose.” (6). Jackson essentially allowed State governments to act as they please with the remaining Indians in the acquired land. Rather than offering them protection, Jackson left the fate of the Indians to the States, which in turn led to forced emigration. Jackson found that relations between Indians and individual states should not be interfered further by the General Government, resulting in taken land and State pressure for the Indians.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was one of America's greatest rhetorical manipulations; as well as, a tragic fate for thousands of Native Americans. President Jackson addresses Congress stating, "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government...in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation” (President Jackson's address to Congress). The language used not only misrepresents what actually occurred during relocation, but also twists the historical legacy of the Indian Removal Act. President Jackson uses “happy” and “great pleasure” giving the impression the natives and the executive and legislative branches are joyous of the impending doom for the tribes.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A minority leader of the Cherokee Indians, Major Ridge, met and signed The Treaty of New Echota. The majority of the Cherokee Indians did not approve or sign this agreement and legally challenged the treaty and the relocation of their people. They tried to settle this matter peacefully with a case called Cherokee Nation v. Georgia in 1831. John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, ruled that the Cherokee Nation was under United States protection, a “domestic dependent nation” meaning Georgia had no authority to relocate the Indians. In another case, Worcester v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the terms of the treaty and the forcible relocation of the Indians.…

    • 2604 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee were one of the many tribes that assimilated into the white culture. Although they did exactly what they were expected to do, Andrew Jackson and a few states had trouble grasping onto their assimilation. Jackson went through with a historical event that to this day in American History is known as the Trail of Tears, due to the substantial amounts of deaths that were sprung from it. Jackson had no thought of whether he was doing the right or wrong thing, because to him it was all driven by the desire for more power from the people who elected him.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Indian.html U.S. Department of State. Indian Treaty and Removal Act of 1830. (n.d.) http://future.state.gov/when/timeline/1830_timeline/indian_treaties_and_the_removal_act _of_1830.html…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Indian removal act called for the removal of all Indians in the eastern part of the U.S to be moved westward beyond the Mississippi river to present day Oklahoma.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trail Of Tears Essay

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Trail of Tears was a dark turn in Native American history, which also affected Mississippi during Andrew Jackson’s presidency. Jackson’s Indian Removal Act forced out the Native Americans out of their land by the federal government and walk thousands of miles to designated territories across the Mississippi river. This was caused by white America’s urge to expand and grow cotton in the southern states. Since majority of the states was owned by the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Seminole, and Creek tribes Almost 125,000 Indians preoccupied the states of Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, North Carolina, and Florida during the 1830s since the time of their ancestors. This issue boiled over when white settlers were infuriated by the population of Native…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays