Indian Allotment Policy

Decent Essays
Hi Kassy,

You made a good point. I agree with you that both policies were aimed to help the Indians change their current living conditions by understand what best suits their needs. The Indian Reorganization Act removed the land allotment and allowed them to live in their own ways. The Indians did not know how to deal with the land and lacked efficient tools when they were alloted the land previously. So the abolishment of the land allotment was good for them. I think the two policies represents the attempt of the United States to help the Native Americans sincerely.

Hua

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Reorganization Act was a combination of good and bad. It can be viewed as bad due to the fact that it was the National governments plan to further transform the Native Americans. They passed the Indian Reorganization act to have the tribes run a government just like the National government. However, The Native Americans had their own culture, and they held a lot of pride to that. The government was unhappy with the Native American’s unwillingness to disregard their lifestyle and become a part of their society.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the Indian Removal the Indians were pushed out of their territory and pushed to new territory. The policy made the Indians live longer making them rich and wealthy with new and extensive territory. The Indian Removal act did its purpose and didn’t end with annihilation from war. The United States benefited the Indians, “The United States will play to send the natives to a land where they may live longer and possibly survive as a people”(Doc A). The act was a benefit to both sides.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dawes Severalty Act which is also known as the General Allotment Act was passed on February 8, 1887 by Congress and signed my President Grover Cleveland. Congress stated the goals of the Act, “were simple and clear cut: to extinguish tribal sovereignty, erase reservation boundaries, and force the assimilation of Indians into the society at large.” The Act required Native Americans to be give up their land and be relocated in return for individual land grants. The Dawes Act divided Indian reservations into smaller sections allowing more protection for the United States over Indian territories. The goal of dividing up the reservations were to help Native Americans integrate into American society and create independent landholders which would cause tribes to break up and become more independent.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This profound idea ultimately lead to the Indian Removal Act, it was widely accepted only by the Americans, they believed there cannot be progress without being tough and to be tough they felt a certain obligation to use any means necessary to achieve their goal. Progress was smooth, railroads began to form allowing people to make their way from the east to…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cause of the act was that the government needed their land to improve their economy and industrial business. 2 This act allowed the president to grant Indian tribes unsettled western land in exchange for their territories within…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act In 1828 Andrew Jackson had own presidency and had succeed by changing things with the government. One of many was him having a special relationship with the common people. He removed about 10 percent of workers and replaced with loyal friends and followers. In the 1800’s Native Americans had been living next to white neighbors, taking on their culture.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson The United States’ seventh president, Andrew Jackson served two terms from 1829-1837. He is known for making many difficult decisions, but I believe that his decisions on the Indian Removal Act, the Spoils System, and Bank War were wrong. The Indian Removal Act created tension between the United States and the Native Americans. The Indian Removal Act granted the United States land the Native Americans were living in east of the Mississippi River.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, they are wrong. Even if it allowed expansion, the government still made many crucial mistakes. The Indians were lied to. The government made promises that they never kept. According to one document, “The object was, first, to take their lands.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Book “I wish I’d been there” the author talks about what it would have been like if you were able to witness the events of a historical event such as the Salem Witch trials, the Day Lincoln was shot or the Amistad trial. These events impacted a lot of people and because of that, it has shaped the course of history to what we know today. History’s biggest conflict is that we never have enough information about what happened and we have to infer about a lot of stuff. The importance of “I wish I’d been there” is that because it shows what really would have happened if you were there and you would be able to see everything and figure out all of the important historical events and details and why each thing came to me. History is important to all of us and this book shows us exactly why.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1854, the Federal Government abolished the northern half of Indian Territory and established the Kansas and Nebraska Territories, which were immediately opened up to white settlement. Many of the tribes occupying the land ended up on vastly reduced Reservations. Under the 141 Reservation System of cultural assimilation, American Indians kept their citizenship in their sovereign tribes. The Reservations were devised to encourage the Indians to live within clearly defined zones, and the U.S. promised to provide: food, goods, money, and protection from other tribes and white settlers. The Reservation policy also reflected the views of some of the educators and protestant missionaries that forcing the Indians to live in a confined space with little opportunity for nomadic hunting would make it easier to "civilize the savages.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Indian removal act called for the removal of all Indians in the eastern part of the U.S to be moved westward beyond the Mississippi river to present day Oklahoma.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson made a policy in the 1780s to assimilate American Indians into white society. Andrew Jackson, however, passed a policy of removing Cherokees from their lands to the west of the Mississippi in the 1830s. The common goal of the two policies was to acquire Indian lands because the white colonists wanted to expand westward. Battles went on between the Americans and the American Indians, as one tried to take as the other tried to protect the lands. The policies the presidents passed was to take the lands of the Indians, but they had different ways of doing so.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The contrast between indigenous people and those who voluntarily arrived by ship has been emphasized more than commonalities constructing the “ecological Indian” as a pinnacle or at the least something that “Man…” is not. The hunting practices employed by many indigenous tribes was ritualistic in nature with a right and wrong methodology to utilize (Krech 129), however, colonizers would question these practices with regards to buffalos in comparison to the European “proper” and “sporting” methods of hunting (Krech 130). Additionally, the prioritization of economic security over environmentalist concerns can be understood as very human, but increased pressure and scrutiny from outside of a reservation is placed on indigenous populations because they have been held up to the standard of an “ecological Indian” (Krech 226-227). This is another example of a socially constructed “fundamental truth” because these criticisms do not acknowledge the history that forced the tribal leaders to choose between two detrimental…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays