The Indian Removal Act And The Removal Act

Superior Essays
In the years succeeding the War of 1812, the land disputes between Natives and U.S. settlements increasingly demanded a solution; Congress eventually passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which they believed would settle the century-long land disputes with Natives. This act forced all Native settlements to migrate to the lands west of the Mississippi so that U.S. settlements would be able to expand further. Between the years 1828 and 1838, over 80,000 American Indians were removed from their homelands and pushed west, giving American Government 15,355,767 acres of Native land. (Campbell, G.) While the government attempted to rationalize the policy of providing alternate homelands for the Indians, the functional effect of this migration was …show more content…
However, the legislation was effective in paving the way for removal when combined with promises of money and land in the West. Political pressure upon Indian leadership eventually resulted in the signing of treaties to relinquish their eastern and southern lands. The law “...paved the way for the reluctant, and often forcible emigration of tens of thousands of American Indians to the West.” ("Indian reservation.") Perhaps the most famous of these forcible removals was the emigration of the Cherokee Indians, which came to be known as the Trail of Tears. The Removal Act made the promise of aiding the tribes in their move:
“And be it further enacted, That upon the making of any such exchange as is contemplated by this act, it shall and may be lawful for the President to cause such aid and assistance to be furnished to the emigrants as may be necessary and proper to enable them to remove to, and settle in, the country for which they may have exchanged; and also, to give them such aid and assistance as may be necessary for their support and subsistence for the first year after their removal.” (“United States Statutes at Large,”
…show more content…
The guarantee found in that Act surely seemed clear, that “...the President solemnly to assure the tribe or nation with which the exchange is made, that the United States will forever secure and guaranty to them and their heirs or successors, the country so exchanged with them…” (“United States Statutes at Large.”) History shows that is one of a litany of broken promises, which Native Americans are still fighting to get

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the Indian Removal the Indians were pushed out of their territory and pushed to new territory. The policy made the Indians live longer making them rich and wealthy with new and extensive territory. The Indian Removal act did its purpose and didn’t end with annihilation from war. The United States benefited the Indians, “The United States will play to send the natives to a land where they may live longer and possibly survive as a people”(Doc A). The act was a benefit to both sides.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian removal movement of 1830 started because Americans were moving west and acquiring land to settle, but the Indians became the obstacle. Another factor that made the Americans to remove the Cherokees was, because of the gold that Georgians had found in Cherokee’s land. The government would make treaties, but the government would not fully follow the treaties. While the Americans moved west, they introduced diseases, but this was not enough to wipe out the tribes, war was the answer. It was not until Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that it allowed to move Indians further west that became a real problem for the tribes.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Monetary awards were given to guides and supporters of the removal plan. Indians who resisted migration west were put into stockades for long periods of time, until the arrangement for removal began. “They are prisoners, without a crime to justify the fact”.5 Voices of Andrew Jackson, John Ridge, Lewis Cass, the Cherokee women, Evan Jones, Elias Boudinot and many more could not change the course of events happening to the Cherokee nation. The complexity of this time in history raises many concerns for the survival of the Native Americans. The authors posed many questions as to the actions and decisions of the Cherokees.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This profound idea ultimately lead to the Indian Removal Act, it was widely accepted only by the Americans, they believed there cannot be progress without being tough and to be tough they felt a certain obligation to use any means necessary to achieve their goal. Progress was smooth, railroads began to form allowing people to make their way from the east to…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The President at the time, President Andrew Jackson was an advocate of what he referred to as “Indian removal.” In 1830, he signed the Indian Removal Act, giving the federal government the power to exchange unsettled land west of the Mississippi for Native American lands within the existing state borders. During this time some tribes moved peacefully but many resisted to relocation policy. In the winter of 1831, the Choctaw Native Americans, one of the five peaceful tribes, was the first Indian nation to be totally kicked off of their lands by the U.S. Army.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The white settlers had wanted the Native Americans land for farming. Jackson had decided to remove all Native Americans from their land. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, ordering all Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi River. The Five Civilized Tribes consists of The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Creek, and Chickasaw.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Treaties was one way the U.S. Government us to displace Indians from their land, the removal act of 1830 was a mechanism used to displace the Indians. Where this failed, the government broke the treaties and the court's ruling to spread the movement west. Americans flocked to the south, began moving toward into what would become Alabama and Mississippi. The Indian tribes living there created a problem to the expansion; white settlers petitioned the government to remove them President Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe wanted the tribes to trade their land for lands in the west. This did not happen the major transfer happen only because of war.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830, also known as the Trail of Tears, was the forced removal of Indians from their homes to the state of Oklahoma, which was considered Indian territory at the time.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It forced the Native Indians to surrender millions of acres of land and to move to west. Throughout the removal many Indians suffered through sickness and death. The Indian Removal Act not only removed the Indians from their rightful lands forcefully but also is responsible for over 4000 deaths of the Native Americans, that today is known as the ‘Trail of Tears’. Bibliography Calloway, Colin G. Kill the Indian and Save the Man 1870s-1920s. (In Bedford/St. Martin’s (Ed.), First Peoples: A Documentary Survey of American Indian History, 4th ed., 2012) 412-483.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ben Nighthorse Campbell, a Cheyenne Indian and past U.S Senator, once said, “treaties are promises between two nations. And whether they are going to be valid or not, and whether they are going to last or not, is based on the heart and belief of the people that are participating.” (Harjo,221). This short statement is packed with reference to historical treatment and intent of American Indian treaties, acknowledgement of the continued power of treaty making in the present and the lasting social, economic, legal and strategic impacts of reclaiming sovereignty. These sentiments reveal that treaty making has had an extensive effect on the daily lives, both past and present, of countless American Indians as well as American ideology and law.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Indian removal act called for the removal of all Indians in the eastern part of the U.S to be moved westward beyond the Mississippi river to present day Oklahoma.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary #2 In Contradictions, Ronald Takaki continues to discuss the blatant racism exhibited by the Englishmen, particularly towards Native Americans, African Americans and the Irish. Claiming that Native Americans could not survive in white society, President Jackson sought to “abolish Indian tribal units and allow white settlers to take cultivated Indian lands” (Takaki, 81). The goal was to move the Native Americans west of the Mississippi River, so that they would be able to live in peace and have their own governments. The Native Americans, however, were not keen on giving up lands that had been theirs for generations.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays