Is it safe to expand space exploration? In the US today there is debate about whether or not space exploration should be continued and further more into space. Though some people believe increasing it is not wise because it 's dangerous, the United States should increase space exploration because we can learn more, make better technology and gain a lot of money.
Some people believe that manned missions of space explorations are far too dangerous and it’s too expensive. “Space contains the most leading deaths out of the 439 people who have flown on space flights, twenty-two have died. With a 5 percent fatality rate, spaceflight is near the top of the list of the most dangerous jobs in the United States (Pawlick, Grant). ” But NASA runs test …show more content…
But there are some things that we have figured out in space, mathematically speaking we as a whole on Earth know about ¼ of our solar system. Having man going on a mission into space is just too expensive for the economy worldwide, and would pose no benefits if nothing is discovered or found. The more NASA sends people to go into outer space, the less people come back from outer space. Not only that but to send a person into space costs way more than to send robots into outer space (Pawlick, Grant). But NASA is funded by the government, so the money is wasted for the United States economy. Upgrading and testing space shuttles and suits go towards to United States economy as stated before and that affects the world economy for the good to make more space shuttles and better suits. There are many more pros to expanding space exploration then there are cons to it. Many people believe expanding space exploration can increase our knowledge and help the the world as one in the long run. For example, according to Issit and Moreno-Riano, authors of We all …show more content…
Making better and useful technology can help save money save time. Lucrative businesses can be beneficial to the economy and to NASA for safer and better tools and technology. So should we not go more into outer
Some people believe that manned missions of space explorations are far too dangerous and it’s too expensive. “Space contains the most leading deaths out of the 439 people who have flown on space flights, twenty-two have died. With a 5 percent fatality rate, spaceflight is near the top of the list of the most dangerous jobs in the United States (Pawlick, Grant). ” But NASA runs test …show more content…
But there are some things that we have figured out in space, mathematically speaking we as a whole on Earth know about ¼ of our solar system. Having man going on a mission into space is just too expensive for the economy worldwide, and would pose no benefits if nothing is discovered or found. The more NASA sends people to go into outer space, the less people come back from outer space. Not only that but to send a person into space costs way more than to send robots into outer space (Pawlick, Grant). But NASA is funded by the government, so the money is wasted for the United States economy. Upgrading and testing space shuttles and suits go towards to United States economy as stated before and that affects the world economy for the good to make more space shuttles and better suits. There are many more pros to expanding space exploration then there are cons to it. Many people believe expanding space exploration can increase our knowledge and help the the world as one in the long run. For example, according to Issit and Moreno-Riano, authors of We all …show more content…
Making better and useful technology can help save money save time. Lucrative businesses can be beneficial to the economy and to NASA for safer and better tools and technology. So should we not go more into outer