The reduction of trade ultimately reduced economic growth hence developing countries once again being categories as losers within the complex relationship. However, as food prices rose in the global food spike income inequality began to deepen. Income inequality is an indicator of uneven development. Income inequality became present, as wages for supermarket employers remained stagnated during this period (Palley, 2007). Those of the lowest income groups in developed countries would be most significantly affected. It is evident that losers are present globally within the food industry due the dependency of the industry. Losers have been illustrated through the dependency on aid, loss of trade and income inequalities tied to food
The reduction of trade ultimately reduced economic growth hence developing countries once again being categories as losers within the complex relationship. However, as food prices rose in the global food spike income inequality began to deepen. Income inequality is an indicator of uneven development. Income inequality became present, as wages for supermarket employers remained stagnated during this period (Palley, 2007). Those of the lowest income groups in developed countries would be most significantly affected. It is evident that losers are present globally within the food industry due the dependency of the industry. Losers have been illustrated through the dependency on aid, loss of trade and income inequalities tied to food