The aggressive support for English-Only laws in the United States, is largely based on encouraging assimilation, economically, politically, and ultimately - morally. It stands diametrically opposed to bilingualism, threatening that very way of life, and is often viewed in the Latina/o community as xenophobic and nativist. Federal Law in the United States actually stands in opposition to the notion of English-Only laws, refusing to codify English as the official national language, however that does not curb state level social movements advocating in opposition to the marginalized group. Exploring these ideas, it is important to dissect the specific examples of English-Only advocation, as well as the institutional resources that Latina/os use…
Suddenly, America has become extremely diverse, and with the array of languages forming from that, it would be unprecedented to think that every person can speak English. Two authors, Martin Espada and Richard Rodriguez discuss the issues and challenges towards bilingualism. “The new bathroom policy at english high school “ by Martin Espada and “Hunger of Memory” by Richard Rodriguez, each have opposing views on the same topics involving languages. Ranging from political issues to social/ family issues, these essays cover them all.…
Espada explains the case of California’s Proposition 187, which according to Espada “would prevent immigrants from receiving basic human services, such as education and health care” (13). Legislature such as Proposition 187 attempts to deny bilinguals access to education and is part of a broader assault on bilingual’s basic rights as Americans. Espada also argues that English-speaking Americans commit acts of cultural aggression against bilinguals in order to recognize English as the most important language in America. When Espada encounters a man expressing hateful views towards the Spanish language, he writes, “The man… was only expressing the same idea… as were those legislators inside the State House who were attempting to make English the official language of Massachusetts, which would then serve as the foundation for legal discrimination against Spanish and against Latinos” (7). This attempt to recognize English as Massachusetts’ official language demeans people who speak other languages and suggests that English is more important than the variety of other languages and cultures present…
Jeanine Macario, a recruiter with Anne Whitten Bilingual Recruitment says ““There’s a lot more opportunities for bilingual workers who can read, write and express themselves orally in both official languages.” It is crucial to have two official languages as it helps everyone communicate and creates a stronger bond between people in the country. The Multiculturalism Act helps hold onto…
He also mentioned the backlash by proponents of “English Only” in education who viewed bilingualism as a threat to American identity, but dressed it up as a concern for the Latino community educational disparities (pg. 140). This topic reminded me of the program “Spanish for Fluent Speakers” that I was part of for three years. The program was often undermined, as some saw it as means for Spanish speakers to evade the language requirement and take an easy class. I often received questions such as: “Why are you taking a Spanish class if you already speak it?” Despite those negative perceptions, this was a program that allowed me to reconnect with my Hispanic roots and recognize the social capital of bilingualism.…
Krauthammer further illustrates that today in the United States Spanish is likely to take over the English language, for much of the population is Spanish speaking citizens (540). Creating a universal language that all citizens speak will initiate a common form of communication, so that all Unites States citizens can communicate and work efficiently with one another. In order for America to succeed and prosper over other powerful countries, all citizens must communicate and understand one another in order to discuss the issues of this country. If the United States allows for immigrants to continually speak their native language, and not assimilate or at least learn how to speak English, America will face great difficulty when trying to enforce laws and regulations. If Spanish eventually prevails over the English language much chaos will take place, for those who do not speak English are very unlikely to comprehend or understand the laws and regulations America constitutes.…
All students of the American education system should be fluent English speakers. Martin Espada and Richard Rodriguez, two revered essay writers both possess conflicting opinions about how bilingualism should be handled. Espada believes that language has ties to culture, and they should all be preserved; however, Rodriguez’s view of bilingualism is more methodical, he thinks learning the language used for public communication is the most beneficial method, regardless of any cultural ties that may be abandoned. Martin Espada’s view of bilingualism can be explained through his usage of a metaphorical analogy, wherein his essay he wrote, “English and Spanish are like two dogs I love. English is an obedient dog.…
When anyone comes into the United States to make a new life they have to assimilate in order to progress their life here. One way is to learn the English language, but with that sometimes their own language is lost, along with their culture and their true identity. In Gloria Anzaldua, “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”, she explains how the Anglo attacks her language and violates the First Amendment, which made way for a new language to form along with a new identity. In the beginning she gives a scene where she is at the dentist and they are trying to “tame her wild tongue” and explains how speaking Spanish at recess could get her “three licks on the knuckles with a sharp ruler” (Anzaldua 2947).…
Loury states in his work that the United States as a nation is an “ethnic melting pot” (248). The term melting pot implies that everyone who comes to the United States merges or melts into the United States culture. However, this is not true in the States. Citizens of the United States still retain a part of their original cultures. This is why the United States does not have a nation food or language because the nation is a mixture of cultures from other nations.…
It is a topic that many are unaware of, but it exists. Many Anglo people believe that to be American you have to speak English, “If you want to be American, speak ‘American.’ If you don’t like it, go back to Mexico where you belong.” Are they aware of the fact that English was not the first language here in America? We can see a sense of rejection in the first paragraph.…
While there is no official language in the United States, English is used throughout the country. This leads nearly every American down a path that requires them to learn and speak at least some English. However, the roots of America lie in immigrants coming to the country for a chance at a new start. Therefore, multiple languages, whether dominant or minor, should be viewed as an example of what makes America what it is. These languages should not be purged in favor of English, but preserved in order for future generations to garner an understanding of the various cultures and ideologies that go along with different languages.…
In a college government course, it is taught that America does not share societal culture because it has been founded on immigration. This means that there are many people who live in America with many different origins. Though it (America) has been founded on immigration and does not have a national language, the dominant language is English. School is taught in English, the majority of the people speak English, street signs are in English, so on and so forth. Immigrants that come to America who do not speak English may have trouble with feeling at home in their new environment.…
Espada explains thoroughly in his essay the importance of standing up for your right to speak with a native tongue andnot letting English dominate over other languages, such as spanish. Espada says “I have learned that the best way for me to maintain Spanish is to fight for the right to speak spanish” (p 4 lines 16-18) Your languages are your identity and staying connected is essential. Diversity is influential when it comes to bilingualism. Diversity however is not possible if English is forced onto native speakers encouraging them to rid of their alternative languages.…
On the other hand, being a bilingual could even give their children more advantages and opportunities. For instance, my language partner, called Mitchell, is a Chinese-Americans mixed-blood. She speaks English and Chinese, and she’s not Americanized because her parents are willing to let her access to different cultures. Mitchell is always proud of it, “It is always not a bad thing to learn more stuffs. The more immigrants that have been Americanized, the less diversity the world is.…
is so far behind in advancements academically and socially. Every other country encourages and supports bilingual education. In each claim and argument Rodriguez presents there are harmful consequences that the reader takes away from them. He believes that one’s native language and the public language are unable to coincide, not based on research or statistics, merely based on his own personal experience with not being able to handle the two. The takeaway from this belief is that there should only be one language in America, the public language.…