The Darwinian theory doesn’t give an explanation for complexity of precisely tailored parts of cilia and flagella. Biochemists have shown the blood clotting is very complex and consists of interdependent protein parts. These irreducibly complex systems would be neutralized by Darwin’s mechanism of natural selection. Millions of different combination of heavy chain sequences and thousands of different light chains combinations give billions of different formations of antibodies. No answers have been found for the origin of the immune …show more content…
Those that tolerate a Darwinian explanation are considered negative arguments. A positive argument defends the design the all parts are listed in order to fulfill a purpose. According to Richard Dawkins admits that the appearance of design is part of the very definition of biology: Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose. Moreover, Dawkins admits that the appearance of design is overwhelming.
Behe mentions in his book that we can’t prove with certainly that all biochemical systems were designed. In conclusion Behe believes that this theory of intelligent design will modernize science were there is a lack of possible solutions. It will allow new hypotheses to be considered. Behe describes intelligent design as a theory to be a useful tool in the advancement of science.
At a public lecture at Princeton University Dr. Behe answered the question to why scientists are reluctant to embrace the theory of intelligent design, with people considering something of natural design implicates something beyond nature and is not real science. Darwin’s Black Box is very important for its contribution to the debate between intelligent design and