Argumentative Essay: Is War Necessary?

Improved Essays
If someone is in danger or they feel threatened, is war necessary? Some people believe it is, but others believe it is not. is sometimes preferred because some countries don’t respond to just talking. Also, some countries might start war on our country, so war is necessary to stop them. For example with North Korea, they do not respond to talking and threaten the United States with nuclear threats, talking with them will not work and could just result to an attack on the U.S. War is oftentimes necessary because sometimes violence is necessary, there are positives to declaring war, and it can get things done faster.
A reason that war is sometimes necessary is that sometimes violence is necessary. If terrorism threatens a country, military action will most likely need to be taken (“Violence Sometimes Necessary”). If terrorism or a terrorist threaten a country, like 9/11, war may have to be the only option, because otherwise whoever is attacking your country will not stop unless you put a stop to it. The U.S probably would not
…show more content…
War has been known to speed up the process of things in the past. People disagreed over the Civil war for the rights of slaves. They could’ve talked about it and tried to reason with the opposing side, but they also probably would’ve came to a stand- still and not have gotten anywhere. War sped up that process by being able to come to a decision on the issue by which side won the war. And a current example with North Korea- their leader and government doesn’t reason well and the U.S doesn’t know if or when they may launch a nuclear missile on the U.S. They have threatened the U.S before with missile threats and so it may be easier to declare war on them so the U.S has a chance at winning instead of the chance of getting bombed. On the other hand, declaring war on North Korea would probably cause the death of a lot of innocent people, which is a bad

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People have different thoughts on if the U.S should retain or dismantle their nuclear arsenal. People that think it should be kept make arguments like how nuclear weapons help keep the U.S safe and how they can be used if there were to be any sort of war. On the contrary People that feel our nuclear weapons should be dismantled say our nuclear weapons cost too much to be kept and they make us seem hostile to other nations. So should the U.S keep its nuclear arsenal? Well there are lots of pros and cons to both sides of this argument.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Argumentative Analysis

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first factor that makes powerful states struggle to achieve the intended political outcomes is military power restriction and the fear of escalation. To clarify, major military powers avoid the escalation to the extent that makes other major powers to interfere directly, or to use a destructive weapon like the atomic bomb. With the innovation of nuclear weapon the Clausewitz concept of “absolute war” is finally achievable. This will generate fear and will restraint powerful state from using maximum power to prevail. Thus the victory as a proper outcome to be expected of the use of American arms was intractable for the duration of the cold war, for the reason of the sensible fear of the escalation of nuclear holocaust.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While it seems logical to fight fire with fire and have the South develop nuclear weapons, this is not the best solution for the long-term stability of the peninsula. Therefore South Korea should develop nuclear weapons. The main reasons are South Korea can start the South and North in to a deadly war as well as U.S. should stay in charge of nuclear weapons. One factor why South Korea shouldn’t make nuclear weapon is that they can launch the South and North into a world war 3. The North is aggressive because they’re afraid of South Korea.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Living With Terrorism

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages

    They are similar in the fact that Bush 's approach to the global war on terror was misguided and wasteful and that even though Obama tried to end the global war on terror by shifting from a large scale military intervention to a limited counter-terrorism effort would not be enough to end the war on terror. They also agree that the war on terror is not something that can be easily won, it will be very long and bloody conflict that a majority of Americans don’t want because they believe American resources can be put to better use and as Americans we don’t like seeing US soldiers being killed on foreign soil for a cause they don 't understand. They also agree that a full scale military approach to terrorism will not solve the problem without taking into factors such as regional dynamics and the religious sects of the region, as we saw in Iraq in 2004 and in the 80s with Reagan 's response to the war on…

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people think that nuclear weapons protect them, but in reality they put them at more risk of nuclear attack. Politicians use nuclear missiles to show that they have power. This however shows that they indeed have no power and use nuclear missiles as a crutch. This blinds the people into thinking they are a powerful leader and the people vote for them. The Nuclear missiles are making our view of politics skewed.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Changing our stance out of the blue would be counter-productive in East Asia, one of the most critical regions that the US should continue having a strong presence. The repercussions of removing US military in East Asia and encouraging allies to possess nuclear weapons would be detrimental in maintaining a sustainably amicable relations with our allies in the East because taking such bold actions of pulling US military troops would be contradictory to the Defence Treaties we’ve signed with both Japan and South Korea and may nullify our other alliances all over the world. The trust towards the US not only by our East-Asian allies but also by our European allies would be put in jeopardy in this critical moment. Instead of alienating our allies by leaving them, its more beneficial for us to strengthen our alliance and protect the current status quo while monitoring, deterring, and controlling China’s expansionist attitude. The act of encouraging our allies to carry nuclear weapons would also be contradictory to our foreign policy of denuclearization that we’ve actively advocated for the last 4 decades and supported by the American people.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main purpose of the camera was to get the public to do what the government wanted. Without the support of the public, America would not have got far in the war. Some might say that lying through these pictures was a necessary evil. They had to lie to the people of America to insure that they had their support to win the war. They may have taken away the public's way of seeing, by misleading them, but the government thought that this was important to the war effort.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This criticism is, however, being flawed if looking at it from a logical perspective and given a new threat that terrorist can now pose. This is because the literal interpretation of Article 51 claims that a country cannot defend itself until it suffers harm . This is extremely dangerous as it limits the state to attempt to solve the issue through nonviolent means such as negotiating, which as mentioned earlier, states will not do with terrorist. This then leaves the state defenseless to do anything until the attack occurs, which thus violates its right to defend…

    • 2568 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keeping some of his opinions secret, Lincoln denied this, worried that it would affect his outcome, but many still believed that he wanted to abolish slavery. This denial added controversy to the debate, also making it more interesting. As the two intelligent senators went at each other, they were adding stress and controversy to the union. In the end, Douglas won the senate, while later, after gaining much needed experience, Lincoln wound up as president of the Unite States in the midst of the civil war. As time went on, Lincoln got mixed reactions from the citizens of America…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Of course he wouldn’t want to waste such an expensive piece of work on just a demonstration but still something could have been done to show how much destruction could be caused from the atomic bomb. That isn’t the most wholesome reason to drop a highly destructive bomb but it doesn’t seem too out of the ordinary for a government official to do so. Another reason said behind the dropping of the bomb is that it was to scare the Soviet Union out of continuing the war by showing how much power America had. It is hard to tell what the actual reason behind dropping the bomb was. America wanting to show who is boss is a big reason many people think the bomb was used.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays