Importance Of The Westminster System In New Zealand

Improved Essays
In this essay will be a detailed explanation about the Westminster model in New Zealand. There has been a significant change in the Westminster model since it was established since 1840 after British settlers brought the Westminster model to New Zealand. The key principle changes include mixed member proportional(MMP), multi-party system, coalition government and change in executive power. Although these are only just some of the significant changes that have had an impact on the Westminster model of government in New Zealand. The New Zealand government was based on the Westminster system but have made changes to suit New Zealand. New Zealand moving away from the old Westminster system has meant that New Zealand are in control of their own …show more content…
A two party system is when only two political parties dominate the party system each going back and forth between who wins the elections. New Zealand’s two party system was said to be “an almost pure two party system. However, there was a small amount of people who were voting for other smaller parties besides the big two. This can lead on to the significant change that is from two party to a multi-party system. A multi-party system is a system that gives all parties the chance to run in an election with all parties having an equal chance of getting control of the government. New Zealand started using the multi-party system in 1996. This change can show the significance of how New Zealand is moving away from the fact that the government can be run by more than just two party systems. One reason for the change to multi-party system includes the fact that voters tended to look at smaller parties instead of the big two parties so they opted for a multi-party system. This change made multi-party seem like it could stabilise the New Zealand government for the future as no one party could dominate the government. Even though New Zealand are classed as a multi-party system there is some doubt that we are moving towards a two party system as national and labour have dominated the New Zealand …show more content…
A single party government is when one party who gains majority of the votes in a general election will be guaranteed control of the government. Usually with this system you can tell who is going to gain control over the government before they even count the votes. This system of government saw the party gain the ability to pass any bills they wanted because it would already have majority of the voters. The government could rarely be defeated. Soon after MMP was established the government system went from single majority to government to the coalition government where political parties must form alliances in order to cooperate and prevent the chances of one party taking over the government. Basically this system was introduced to provide a more stable way of running the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Docherty (2002) found that most provinces complain about senate reform but care little about reform because the move to inter-state federalism would give the Premier of Prince Edward Island, a place with very little population, the same power as Ontario with a large population. Docherty also notes there is a lack of political will to tackle the complicated issues of how reforms would play out. These obstacles provided by Docherty inform the reader of why the Canadian senate is…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is accomplished because a higher number of elected representatives guard against the attempts of the few, so the factions won't become the majority and the government won't disintegrate whenever there is a dispute. Having a government that could withstand factions that commonly work against public interest and infringe on the rights of others is how to make a country stand the test of time. But is this true? Our two party system is a faction within itself. I feel as if James Madison would not be approving of the two party system, since it seems like it is typically just two very different sides constantly disagreeing with one another.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An electoral reform is a change in the electoral system of a country in order to improve how public desires are expressed in an election. An electoral reform is necessary for Canada’s democracy in the 21st century since the current system does not accurately represent people’s choice. By analyzing the pros and cons from the different recommendations on proportional representation (PR), I will prove how this new electoral system is a better option for Canadians over the current one, first-past-the-post (FPTP). Background…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The linkage groups like interest groups and political parties are vital to keeping the citizens informed and involved. A two-party system may seem to be not the most effective way to run a government. But, there are many advantages to having political parties. By having a two-party system, citizens interests and opinions are balanced.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Forging party system(s) will actually divide the perception of the people – instead of having independent opinions and well structured government system for the country to prosper. It seems like the party system are for the candidates’ own good and benefits, not solely for the country to prosper…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Per Hudson, the solution to this problem is to have a political alternative. The parliamentary system is a combination of the executive and legislative branches with the prime minister as the leader of the majority party. With this option, Hudson lists a few items he considers to be relevant to a parliamentary system, such as a greater accountability of the candidates and the officials by their respective political parties, as compared to American politicians. An example Hudson cites occurred in 1990 when the Conservative Party asked Margaret Thatcher to resign because they feared her leadership would result in defeat for the party. While this, indeed, is a change usually not seen in America, some of the parliamentary system features will not fit our country.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The three government systems majority, coalition and minority all have their own limitations and benefits. A majority system is a single party where only one member is elected out of a constituency; [a specified area of voters who elect a person to represent them legislatively] the most adequate person should be elected to represent the constituency. This system is very common and they can do what they want to. It is easier to pass bills and do not have to worry about the opposition. The minority system consist of many different parties where that one party does not have more than 50% of the power.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Party system arose in the United Sates in 1828. During this time the major parties included the Democratic and Whig Parties. In the 19th century the Whig Party made more of an impact on the nation. The second party system arose with an increase of voter interests leading into the election.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the united states, there are only two major political parties. Unlike other countries where they have more than two parties, which led into inaccurate vote results, however in the USA it’s completely different. In the USA they want to keep and prevent presidents from being elected with less than a majority of the vote. To make it uncomplicated for the people to be convinced on what they believe in. The two parties in the united state of America are republicans and democrats.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Topic 1: “Should QLD reinstate an upper house?” The actions of Queensland Politicians, over the past years, have produced an object lesson in the dangers of unrestrained authority and as a result has prompted the question, “should Queensland reinstate an upper house”. Although reinstating the legislative council will not amend the many issues facing Queensland, it will be beneficial to return to a bicameral state. In 1922 legislation was passed in Queensland abolishing the upper house, also known as the legislative council, and as a result is the only unicameral state in Australia (Queensland Government 2011).…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As previously stated, the two basic political parties in the America are Republicans and Democrats. “A political party can be defined…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The current party system obligates voters to always vote with their party. Without having political parties, there will no longer be traditionally…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This suggests that we will have one party that will be ruling and dominating for a period of time not indefinitely. The second characteristic involves the fusion of power in a cabinet dominance versus the separation of powers. Then there’s the third stating there is a unicameral legislature versus a bicameral legislature with balanced powers. The fourth, consists of the structure of the party system wherein the executive party has two parties that are large enough in their share of their vote and large enough in their presence of the parliament to be able to affect the formation of a cabinet in a parliamentary…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thinking About Political Reform by John R. Johannes is about making the American government operate smoother for the people and politics. Political reformers are faced with these challenging issues. They must think about what reforms are great for politics and if they will work out for the people. In the book Thinking About Political Reform Johannes discuss what reform is and list numerous reforms that can benefit American government. This essay is intended to break down each chapter of Thinking About Political Reform so the reader can understand the methods of the book and understand the framework of Thinking About Political Reform.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics