Importance Of The Right To Bear Arms

Superior Essays
Amendment 2, Right to Bear Arms - A Necessary Amendment?

I. Background Information
The Second Amendment of the Constitution is a hotly debated topic, but is not as recognizable as the First Amendment. It allows people to not only use firearms, but to provide them in defense and protection (“Second Amendment”). It is divisive due to the fact that many people have different opinions on what the Amendment actually states. Some citizens believe that it is meant protect the rights of the people to own firearms only if they are included in a militia, while others believe that it protects the rights of the citizens to provide self-defense (Hart 136). The fact that the Amendment can be recognized as two different points of view means that it can create
…show more content…
It guarantees firearms are to be allowed to US citizens in order to defend themselves and/or their family (“Guarantee Right to Arms”). There are many arguments regarding the Second Amendment and it still remains divisive to many citizens of the United States. It is interesting to note the Supreme Court tends to avoid the controversy it presents, although it is Constitutional right. Although the Second Amendment is known around for citizens to defend themselves, there are some disagreements that turn into conflicts regarding the Right to Bear Arms, for example the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings. The Sandy Hook shootings took place at a school of which 20 children died (“Connecticut Shooting”). This created conflict between many belief groups as it was required to look over the Second Amendment again. It was a major issue as most shootings in the United States are not in self-defense, rather they are of a violent nature. The Supreme Court is routinely forced to review this Amendment as there are more uprisings and …show more content…
Unlike the United States, in order to own a firearm they do not take self-defense as a good excuse. Through all the paperwork it takes and the months of waiting to get personal defense, the citizen who wants to obtain a firearm must have a "justifiable reason," otherwise illegal (“Are Australia 's Gun Laws”). Citizens who live in urban areas support the government’s new Amendment, although rural Australia seems to disagree and argued that they should have the Right to Bear Arms. The people who lived in Urban areas agreed since 86% of the shootings are located in these areas across Australia. In fact the ratio to private gun owners to every hundred people now is 15 to 100 (“Are Are Australia 's Gun Laws”). Australia’s gun control laws have changed to drastic measures for the better of the country. Overall, gun law needs to be reviewed in many places and follow the path of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If we don’t have this amendment the results will be like the war of 1812 in which militia’s pitiable condition due to no right to abide any artilleries lead to burning of white house. What is 2nd Amendment? It is the amendment that protect the basic rights of citizens to bear arms and without this right our nation cannot be a world power. The Supreme Court has favored that there are restrictions on what arms a private citizen (that has not been convicted of a violent crime, including a misdemeanor [if you've been convicted of a violent crime you can never legally own a firearm) can own.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout American history, the topic of gun control has been an argument filled with controversy. There have been a number of traumatic events in the country that involved the use of guns; Because of this, many Americans have become weary to the thought of anyone being able to carry a gun. Over the years, there have been many different stances developed pertaining to this topic. Some believe the Second Amendment should be completely abolished, others believe there should be no restrictions on guns, whatsoever. There is also an opinion in the middle of these two stances; some think by combining the two opposite beliefs and collaborating their ideas, a fair resolution could be made.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for gun control to be implemented, laws need to passed. Such laws would include mandatory background checks for the purchase of a firearm, a ban of handguns, or a ban of gun accessories like high capacity magazines and silencers. With the apparently recent rise of gun violence, some Americans blame guns and the lack of gun control for these acts of gun violence. Notably, gun control advocates argue that laws need to be implemented to prevent such atrocities; as there are many people who want gun control to implemented, there are just as many people who claim some of these laws are unconstitutional, ineffective and may only allow for more gun violence in the near future. Indeed, the implementation of Gun Control faces extreme opposition from flatlined gun violence rates, powerful lobby groups, the potential for guns to save lives, and the economic/social importance of guns.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lately, with the high rise of gun violence and mass shootings in the United States gun control, gun laws, and the Second Amendment have been a prevalent controversial topic amongst many. The Second amendment word for word states: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment has been interpreted in many different ways, but it serves one specific purpose. If you read the federalist papers, you will understand the thought process of our founding fathers as they wrote the constitution bill of rights.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Middle Ground of Gun Control The topic of gun control has been one of the most controversial debates in American history. Since the Revolutionary War the right to bear arms has been a constitutional right enjoyed by millions. Although, due to the dramatic increase in the number of gun related incidents, the Second Amendment faces strong opposition that demands radical changes. From school shootings to domestic terrorism in our country, the citizens of America have questioned the government’s power to keep people safe.…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America’s crime rate is at an all time high. Citizens do not feel safe in their own environments. Placing stricter laws on gun control can help reduce these unfortunate circumstances. The federal law does not…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heller. In this case, the problem was that after the District of Columbia passed legislation including the registration of handguns, requiring licenses for pistols, and stating that all legal firearms must be kept unloaded and the trigger locked, a group people said that it took away their Second Amendment right. The people that disagreed with them were private gun owners. The federal trial court said that the Second Amendment only applied to militias and not private gun owners. I think that everyone should be allowed to have firearms because they are good for…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Second Amendment gives the citizens of the United States the right to bear arm. Considering the enormity of this right, a heated debate has ensued on whether this right should be restricted. However, in the interest of public safety this right afforded by the bill of rights should be tightly regulated. This viewpoint has been developed through trial and error, after several mass shootings and high murder rates with a fire arms the United States is rendered no option but to restrict the Second Amendment to preserve the safety of the public.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bringing it all together, the Second Amendment is not just the right to bear arms, but also the right to self-protection and have freedom. From the first trial to the many ongoing current trials, the second amendment, just like every law, is open to interpretation and will be looked at many different ways but they can never take it…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second amendment of the constitution states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The constitution was created in 1789 and revised in 1992. The purpose of the second amendment is for people to protect themselves, but a great deal of people are abusing the purpose. America has had way too many mass shootings and accidents which resulted in many deaths. If the constitution is a set of laws and laws were established to keep people safe, is it truly doing its job?…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, guns are entwined with escalating arguments about gun control and gun violence. Generally speaking, the quarrel scorches across the American terrain like a raging fire; practically every day there is a news story related to a firing arm. To demonstrate, a recent Central News Network article debriefs gun presence in relation to violence and other tragedies. In this case, guns association with homicides, terrorism and mass shootings. In compliance with statistics, there are more gun owners in the United States than anywhere else in the globe.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On one side, rules governing guns use can hinder people’s ability to deter or stop criminal attacks. On the other hand, these same rules have the potential to prevent the harm that guns cause. Every gun law faces this trade-off. Trayvon Martin case wasn’t the end nor was it the beginning of the Second Amendment. Below is a list of cases that’s happened over time pertaining to gun laws.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays