Importance Of The Legislative Branch

Good Essays
The Legislative Branch is the House of Representatives, and the Senate and is known as congress. This branch of government makes laws under Article 1 of the constitution of the United States. The legislative branch consists of the congress and their duties consist of enacting legislation, confirming or rejecting presidential appointments (vetoes), and finally they have authority to declare war on another country. The congress ins formed by two different sub-branches, the House of Representatives and the Senate. The difference between these sub sections is the number of appointed seats. The Senate only has two appointed representatives per state regardless of population, for a total of 100 senators. The House of Representatives they consist …show more content…
The reason they are such an important player in the international laws, it’s because the legislative branch is the only of the three branches that has the authority to declare war on another nation. With the declaration of war towards a country, the United States restriction itself to meet with the burden of war. The legislative branch has also given some of its power to the executive in times of war. This is because sometimes other nations may do things that violate international law such as the use of certain weapons that require immediate response which it is something congress can 't do. The only branch that has the power to declare war is the legislative but they allow for the executive to deploy troops immediately (60 days) without congress ' approval. For example, President Abraham Lincoln was granted powers outside normal functions as president in order to put pressure of the enemies. At that time, the United States was in the brink of war with succeeding states that has once belonged to the union. He cut resources, ordered a blockade and seizing of merchant ships. He was later sued, and the case became known as The Prize Cases. It was during the Civil War that we were able to see exactly how far the federal government would go in order to win the …show more content…
The judicial branch is in charge of interpreting the laws that the legislative branch writes, the meaning of such laws, and the apply it to individual cases and more importantly, they decide whether a law violates the constitution. The Supreme Court is the final stop for any cases that were appealed and they go through the entire legal system chain. Important cases that were affected by war or even an attempt to maintain the overall peace in the US. The Supreme Court is the highest federal court in the US and in order to become a justice one must get nominated by the president of the united states (executive) and approved by the senate (Legislative). The Supreme Court might not seem as important when it comes to the international laws, however, they are burden with the moral decision on whether the other branches are taking it too far when they are executing some of the laws created under duress. A situation created under the threat of war. The Prizes Cases, Korematsu v. United States, are prime examples of cases the Supreme Court had the burden to decide. Their decision then established a more definite, yes or no to the issues. In other words, under war, the Justices must decide under duress on what is acceptable under the constitution and what the situation needs at the time. The Supreme court has said that

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In every instance, military action was authorized in one form or another without an official declaration of war from Congress as prescribed by Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. The question arises as to why the President at the time of each war did not ask Congress for an official declaration of war. For the Korean and Vietnam wars, the government was probably looking to avoid a Russian or Chinese military response and a potential World War III. One scholarly journal suggests that, “The increasing number of codified, international laws that govern belligerent conduct during warfare has made complying with the laws of war extremely costly. One way for states to limit these costs is to avoid admitting they are in a formal state of war by refraining from declaring war.” Additionally, an amendment to the Constitution could be made to allow for the newer way of entering wars.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Executive Branch Essay

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For example, the use of congressional oversight gives Congress the authority to monitor the executive’s policy implementation and executive activities. When the President issue an executive order, Article II Section 3 of the Constitution, he is directed to “take Care that the Laws are faithfully executed.” For any reason the President goes against the Constitution, the Congress can issue an impeachment. Although “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” are the main factors in issuing impeachment, it is a political decision. The House of Representatives can choose to impeach any time for any reason (Ginsberg, Lowi and Weir et al 2015, 302). Since the Judicial Branch have the power to interpret laws, they judge whether or not executive actions are constitutional through the use of judicial review.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rumsfeld, joined by Justice Stevens. This case involved the question of demands national security and the rights to personal liberties of United States citizens. The first approach that Scalia took in his dissent was to assert that it has been the constitutional tradition of our country, even when it came to citizens accused of waging war against the country, to prosecute him federal court for treason or another crime. This exemplifies the formalist approach because it looks to previous interpretations of the constitution and attempts to sway the court to follow the constitution strictly despite the fact that it is a different case with different circumstances. Scalia goes on to protest that the system of separation of powers that we have abided by in the past has protected us from indefinite imprisonment by the President, and to go against that would stop us from this protection.…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote. Although the Judicial Branch has their own…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even though the President’s Commander-in-Chief clause gave President Johnson the power to “act in war,” without the legislative branch’s consensus, it allows for the executive branch to ratify regulations unchecked, which violates the system of checks and balances. The system’s purpose was to make sure one branch does not control too much power. Having the legislative branch has the power to declare war is a necessity to the checks and balance system as giving all the power of foreign affair to the executive branch would create an uneven balance of power. The significance…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court can check Congress by stating that a law unconstitutional. The power is balanced by the fact that the Supreme Court members are appointed by the president and those appointments have to be approved by Congress. This process is affective but it is hard to amend because America has only one constitution. This is known as the checks and balances systems; this is the ways the Framers ensure that the power will not completely fall into the hands of one government, that no branch has the ultimate power over the other two. For example, in our current law, the congress makes the law, the president has the power the power to approve it, do nothing, or veto it; the congress ca again overrides it by 1/3 of majority vote.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    War Argumentative Analysis

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When diplomacy fails, war steps forward. Tensions may escalate dramatically to war until diplomacy works again. Since war is another political instrument, political outcomes should be the motive for the powerful military states to wage, escalate and terminate wars. But sometimes, and despite its military power, these states struggle to reach its political outcomes due to many factors that stand in the way of achieving political outcomes smoothly. For instance, military power restrictions and fear from escalation , strategic vision and mistakes, war predictability, the balance of power and enemy potentials, history, alliances, civil-military relations and domestic support, type of war, and regime type.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Clinton believed (or still might believe) that doing the right thing is the justification to go around doing the legal thing. There are several issues that Fisher implies towards. First, the right or wrong thing to do—even considering that America is the National Police by some—can be very subjective. Right vs. wrong is not a black or white plate form. With that said, that level subjectivity should not be in the hands of one single opinion, but rather a group of people, which is why the framers wanted Congress to play such a critical role in such affairs.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Executive departments and agencies carry out laws and create and enforce detailed regulations based on laws. On the other side Congress creates departments and agencies to deal with specific troubles, this controls the basic structure and authority of each. Presidents cannot create, eliminate, or reorganize departments or agencies without the approval of Congress (Davidson). The last branch of the government is known as judicial. The judicial branch interprets the nation's laws.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Explain the idea of checks and balances. Give three examples of this idea in action. • Checks and balances is basically a safety measure that no branch of government can get too powerful than the other one. The way the federal government is set up with branches each powerful in their own way but each have equal levels of power. So like if the President wants to declare to war on another country he/she can’t without approval from Congress.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays