Importance Of Separation Of Powers In The UK

Improved Essays
Furthermore there are other methods to measure the success of a constitution such as the separation of powers. In the UK the constitutional reform act certainly tried to implement a separation of powers. The Supreme Court in the UK took over the existing role of the Law Lords as well as some powers of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, and removed the functions of Speaker of the House of Lords and Head of the Judiciary of England and Wales from the office of Lord Chancellor which applied a greater separation of powers. However in the U.S they have a greater separation of powers compared to the UK. The UK has one branch which is to powerful and this is the executive. Once the Prime Minister is in power he/she can alter and reshape …show more content…
Article Three of the United States Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. The judicial branch comprises the Supreme Court of the United States and lower courts as created by Congress. The Judges appointed are chosen by a committee who elect the judges by their belief and they do not represent the working class and are not elected by the people. The Supreme Court is the final judge in all cases involving laws of Congress, and the highest law of all the Constitution. The Supreme Court, however, is far from all powerful. Its power is limited by the other two branches of government and the President nominates justices to the court. However the in the UK the Supreme Court is used to interpret the law and resolve dispute, it is much more limited in its powers of judicial review than the constitutional or Supreme Courts of some other countries because of parliamentary sovereignty. A recent U.S Supreme Court ruling lossip v. Gross was carried out in 2015, the case was about executions carried out by a three drug protocol which includes midazolam, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride which did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. On June 29, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled against the petitioners in a 5–4 decision, saying they had "failed to establish a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that the use of midazolam violates the Eighth Amendment. There is ultimately pressure put on the Supreme Court caused by their role and there is also issues posed when the judiciary is left to interpret the constitution in a “modern” context. When the U.S constitution was written by the Founding Fathers there were problems of drafting and ratifying the constitution from scratch this strengthen the need for flexibility due to the changing social and political

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The motto of America “to protect its citizens” was the base for creation of every document in country’s history. The Seven Articles of the United States Constitution guarantees the protection of our rights. They granted all national powers to the congress; however, it allowed each state to retain its sovereignty, freedom, and independence. The Three Branches of government protect our society from single unlimited power and leave the nation in safe position.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Australia is said to be a democracy and seen as being about the people, and fair for all. Thus, separation of powers was formed to make sure that this is the case. Separation of powers puts the institutions of government into three different branches. These branches are: The legislature which make the laws; the executive government put laws into action; and the third brach,the judiciary interprets the laws. Separation of Powers is said to be the cornerstone of fair government. It is supposed to give back a voice to the people, and stop any corruption in governments. But the question to ask is whether the absolute separation of power actually exists in the Australian legal system. We can begin by looking at the billing process as a good example…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution. This means that they can declare federal laws unconstitutional, overrule themselves in previous decisions, and shape public policy. However, there is disagreement over this policy making power which is prominently demonstrated in the debate over judicial activism versus judicial restraint in court…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States. In this case, the court ruled 5-3, declaring that the government’s ability to freeze a defendant 's non-tainted assets during a trial violated the constitution. This is relevant because the court reasoned that without access to proper funds, a defendant might not be able to provide themselves with adequate counsel for their trial. In Glossip v. Gross, the Supreme Court affirmed in a divided 5-4 judgement that the burden of proof required to classify Oklahoma’s use of midazolam, a sedative, as cruel and unusual punishment had indeed not been met. These recent instances of the Constitution’s interpretation have shed an ever growing light on how the American justice system works and the continuing understanding of the United States Constitution. As the nation has evolved, the interpretation of the Constitution has varied. While the Sixth Amendment has been largely upheld in most domestic cases, in fact it has routinely been denied to those who are entitled to its protection when the government deems the situation as a threat to national security. Similarly, the understanding of the Eighth Amendment has been strictly interpreted in matters of domestic law, but the meaning is deviated from in cases where national security has taken the…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are currently 9 Supreme Court Justices serving that oversee the major cases in America. They are chosen by the President and serve until either; death, retirement or impeachment. If there is no proof of harm then they do not try the case. There must be solid evidence and an important case for it to be heard by the Supreme Court. The federal courts interpret the law and the Constitution and make rulings accordingly. Once a ruling is made by the Supreme Court there is no one besides them that can reverse that ruling. The Supreme Court usually doesn’t truly hold trials, they interpret the law and decide how it should be applied then a lower court holds the trial and decides the outcome based on what the Supreme Court says. In other words, the Supreme Court is in charge and tells the lower courts what to do and how to do it, then the lower courts apply what the Supreme Court…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Legistlative branch sets federal regulations, the Exceutive branch signs the treaties and protects home, and what does the Judicial branch have the power to do? Well, while the other two branches are off doing those things the Supreme Court sits back and watch them work. The Judicial branch’s role in the seperation of powers allows them to watch the other two branches of government to make sure they are abiding by the Constitution. This process is known as judicial review. Judicial review gives the courts the power to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the constitution (Tate, 2015). Actions deemed as unconstitutional are rejected…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philadelphia, 1787. The Constitution was written, signed and has become one of the most important parts of U.S history. Americans perceived that the Articles of Confederation had to be changed. The Articles gave Congress for all intents and purposes no power to direct local issues, no power to charge and no power to control business. Without the needed power, Congress needed to rely upon money related commitments from the states. Congress had no cash to pay troopers for their administration in the Revolution War. Later, the Constitutional Convention was called to improve the Articles of Confederation. James Madison and The Founding Fathers all wanted to create a strong national government while preventing tyranny. So how did they do it? They created The Constitution. The Constitution includes The Separation of Powers and the Checks and Balances system to help prevent tyranny.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of powers is the foundation of our government today. The separation of powers is where each branch of government keeps the other in check to ensure that no one branch becomes more powerful than another. Also, the Separation of Powers allows citizens to live carefree lives. Our government and country as a whole today would drastically change without it. This change could destroy the peaceful lives we live today, due to having power corrupting those who gain more of it. Therefore, preventing tyranny is why the Separation of Powers is as important today as it was when the Founders wrote the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you heard about the separation of powers? The separation of powers is important because it limited the government, it had republicanism, and gave individual rights. This essay will demonstrate why the separation of powers was important.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It was a new beginning. So much was at stake when the Founding Fathers came to this country to start anew. They had a lot of uncertainty, but one thing they all fervently desired was to do it right this time! They hoped to be able to create a new society that was governed, not by a monarchy, but by the people and for the people. But how would this be done? Their first attempt was through the Articles of Confederation. This was a start, but it didn’t take long for them to see that it didn’t go far enough – it lacked the muscle needed to accomplish the goals they desired and to meet all of the needs of a nation in its infancy with ever-increasing needs.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president nominates the judge or justices and the senate conform if the senate and the P.O.T.U.S say yes the judge stay in the job for life. In real life they supposed to be nine justices on the court right know with justices Antonin Scalia decease there are eight four to four when it is a tie the supreme court of the United State goes to sleep then it’s not a third branch of government. As of this year the supreme court are tie for conservative four liberal we have no supreme court because the president nominates someone to become justices of the supreme court and senate told him no, but there is a constitution and you go to what has been done for over two hundred years, because there is separation of power check and balance they do it because they can make it stick. As in the T.V. Show the president called to speak to Ashland but he ignored the present call. Each of the nine judges or the supreme court each year the law are the same.The president has the power to appoint justices of the supreme court and he his trying to get the judge to…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Judiciary is the section of government which is tasked with interpreting laws passed by parliament. In the USA the constitution established the Supreme Court under article 3 of the constitution. It is the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decisions can only be overturned by a constitutional amendment. In the UK, a supreme court was established in 2009 to provide greater clarity in the UK’s constitutional arrangements.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power. He drew ideas of separate legislative, executive and federative power, however, he did not mention a separate judicial power, and therefore his analysis is not…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays