Importance Of Separation Of Powers In The Government

Improved Essays
Our government would most likely fail without separation of powers. Separation of powers is an idea, which keeps the government in balance. It divides the government into 3 branches, Executive, Judicial, and Legislative. The three branches are supposed to work together through separation of powers and checks and balances; which makes sure, a single branch keeps within their range of power by giving the other branch the power to balance it out. The Separation of powers is very important to the founders who wrote the constitution and to present day where it is still very much needed. The founders of the constitution used the separation of powers to prevent tyranny. They did not approve of the tyrant that they had as their current leader and did not want the same thing to happen to their country. They also used checks and balances, which also limits the branch's power because they now have to check with the other branches before they can use their powers. Checks and balances works a little like this; the executive branch can veto congressional legislation and nominates the judges for the Supreme Court, the legislative branch approves presidential nominations, can pass over the president’s veto and can remove him or her from …show more content…
A recent issue that comes up with separation of powers is Patient Protection and Affordable care Act also referred to as obamacare because the president was attempting to start the act, which the executive and legislative branches had fights over. The president tried to pass the act but the legislative did not want the president passing laws because that was against the spearation of powers. In the separation of powers it is the legislative to creat and pass the laws and the executive power to veto the laws that the legislative creates. Even if they are not reaching for power the lines set in the separation of powers were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny by using the Separation of Power. There are three branches the legislative, executive and judicial. The power was separated equally among each branch to protected against tyranny. Each branch depends on each other in order to work. The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive carries out the laws and judicial holds courts for crimes.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks and balances were created to keep one branch of government from having control over another branch of government. In Document C, it says, “… the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This means the branches of government all check each other to make sure one branch does not have more power than another. The branches can approve or disapprove with things the other branches have decided on. If one branch became over powered than it could take over the government resulting in tyranny.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Powers is the most important value in the Constitution guard against tyranny. In document B James Madison states “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct”. This show that each branch shall have its own distinct powers and not be totally connected. The constitution of the United State states “All Legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in Congress of the U.S. (Senate and House of Representatives)... The executive power shall be vested in a President of the U.S……

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Framers Research Paper

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Separation of powers was exceptionally important to the framers when creating our government. They were immensely worried about one branch becoming too strong and needed a solution to ensure that it would not happen. The Framers created the three branches of government and put checks and balances on each one. Each branch has a number of checks on the others. An example of this is the executive branch has the power to veto a bill from the legislative branch, but the legislative branch can override the veto by a three fifths majority vote…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of power also creates a checks and balances system which prevents one of the branches of government from having more power over another. Ultimately resulting in a equal or limited government. Without these systems limiting the government's powers and keeping it balanced the government would be controlled by a single group of people (tyranny). Our government today is a clear democracy run by our three branches united so I’d say our systems have ultimately create a balanced or limited form of government in the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers defend against tyranny by separating the three branches, legislative, executive, judicial. They should be extremely separate, Madison said in a federalist paper that, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). Some examples that they are separate is that they all have different jobs, Congress makes laws, the president and his cabinet enforce them, and the justices of the supreme court interpret them. They are only supposed to do their job, not the other branches. You cannot have the president fire judges because they disagree, it would lead to politics influencing the cases.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Weaknesses

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Constitution, Watts states that the Constitution “…sets out the basic structure and functions of the various branches of government” (1). These being the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Our founding fathers wanted our country to be free from tyranny of the government and of the people, so they created the three branches of government and the system of checks and balances to make sure that one group does not assume more power than the other. The new structure for our government fixed many of the problems related to the Articles of Confederation. Under the Constitution, the states are no longer sovereign and the laws of the federal government are supreme.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution does not have a direct order to preserve the limitations of the 3 broad powers it entails, nor does it specifically instruct upkeep of a structure of checks and balances. However, it does give the power to legislate to 3 different branches and it provides the means so that each of the branches could repel the approvals and intrusions of the others throughout the document. The Separation of Powers invented by the framers of the Constitution was intended to do one primary thing: keep the majority from governing with excessive power. Based on their understanding, the framers stayed away from granting any branch of the new government too much power. The separation of powers offers a system of common powers known as Checks and…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the founding fathers did not want one single branch of the government to have too much power over the others. Separation of Powers allows for Checks and Balances. The legislative branch is responsible for passing laws that the executive can enact or veto. The Judiciary can review whether or not a bill, or a law is lawful under the Constitution. Moreover, Congress could remove the president if he or she is not doing his or her job properly.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The constitution was signed on September 17,1777. It established laws and showed the basis of how the government would work. The six key principles of the constitution prove that the constitution guards against tyranny in showing how checks and balances, the separation of powers, and popular sovereignty keep things equal and do not give too much power to one small group or person. For starters, checks and balances is the principle that allows national institutions to check each others powers.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So how the separation of powers worked was the government was split into 3 branches; The executive (The president and “workers”), Legislature (The senate and house of representatives) and the Judicial branch (Supreme court and lower courts.) So checks and balances “act” was built so that no branch would become to powerful. So each one branch is basically watched by the other two. So for example; The president (the “executive branch”) can veto laws by congress. Congress can override the veto by a 2/3rds vote.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just Government

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The US Constitution created three branches, the executive, the legislative and the judicial. These branches are independent but have actions they can take to ensure that the other two don’t misuse their power. Power was divided between houses and each house checked every other house so that there would be no excessive power. (Evidence)Due to this, the three branches have a balance between governmental power. The system of checks and balances tried to create a better government for the people by ensuring that no branch of the government had excessive power.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers The term “Separation of powers” was created by Charles-Louis de Montesquieu, a French political philosopher of the 18th century. His doctrine of the separation of powers was based in the idea that the political authority of the country has to be divided in three branches which are the legislative, executive and the judicial branch. His idea was that these three branches must work separated form each other in order to avoid the abuse of power. The legislative branch is responsible for make or enact the laws, the executive branch execute the law so they are responsible for implementing the law made by the legislative branch and the judicial branch is responsible to check the laws, to see if the law is working according…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays