Peaceful protests specifically admit the authority of the First Amendment which runs: “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”2 In relation to religion, peaceful protest allows the morals of individuals to be set against social law. The peaceful nature in pacific protest avoids forcing society into laws while championing ideals and, more importantly, religious convictions. In the first portions of the First Amendment, religion is acknowledged to surpass government as the government rule above religion would permit legislation to restrict faith. Therefore, the peaceful protest serves religion in particular by expressing the religious morals of society, which are superior to legislation. In addition, the assembly of protesters embodies the individual’s democratic influence. Society uses peaceful protest as improvement in government without crushing the latter. An example of peaceful protest is the March For Life held to end abortion in Washington DC. This protest has peaceful principles because it is neither violent nor vulgar. Thought radical protesters may exist, the March for Life does not destroy or subvert property. In addition, the signs and proclaimed messages of this march provoke thought, but do not attempt to slander, curse, or threaten individuals. Again, this protest lets individuals express and explain complaints and beliefs to the government but avoid rebelling against the same
Peaceful protests specifically admit the authority of the First Amendment which runs: “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”2 In relation to religion, peaceful protest allows the morals of individuals to be set against social law. The peaceful nature in pacific protest avoids forcing society into laws while championing ideals and, more importantly, religious convictions. In the first portions of the First Amendment, religion is acknowledged to surpass government as the government rule above religion would permit legislation to restrict faith. Therefore, the peaceful protest serves religion in particular by expressing the religious morals of society, which are superior to legislation. In addition, the assembly of protesters embodies the individual’s democratic influence. Society uses peaceful protest as improvement in government without crushing the latter. An example of peaceful protest is the March For Life held to end abortion in Washington DC. This protest has peaceful principles because it is neither violent nor vulgar. Thought radical protesters may exist, the March for Life does not destroy or subvert property. In addition, the signs and proclaimed messages of this march provoke thought, but do not attempt to slander, curse, or threaten individuals. Again, this protest lets individuals express and explain complaints and beliefs to the government but avoid rebelling against the same