Nuclear Power Research Paper

Improved Essays
Why nuclear power is the clear choice for power generation.
Nuclear power is one of the most efficient and safest forms of power generation. The construction costs of building a nuclear power plant are high, however its operating costs are cheap. The price of uranium is cheap to transport however, it is rare and must be transported to countries that do not have any. Even though uranium is rare and it is hard for developing countries to build a nuclear reactor and purchase uranium, nuclear power is the clear choice in power generation because it is one of the most efficient and cheapest ways to generate power, and nuclear power is much safer and more efficient than fossil fuels. A nuclear power plant can use two different types of generators
…show more content…
Three Mile Island is located near Middletown, Pennsylvania, the reactor that partially melted down was Reactor Three Mile Island Unit 2. The day of the partial meltdown was March 28, 1979. The accident began in the non-nuclear part of the plant, something caused the main water pumps from sending water to the generators. The pressure began to increase, a valve that was supposed to close did not and the plant workers saw on the instruments that it was closed so they didn’t notice the partial meltdown. The radiation that resulted from this meltdown was not enough to affect the workers. After Three Mile Island many new regulations and requirements began to be introduced to nuclear power plants, including better training and more safety precautions (World Nuclear Association). Chernobyl was a much more devastating disaster that resulted in the deaths of multiple plant workings. It was caused by inadequate training and a bad design of the reactor. In April of 1986 a steam explosion caused part of the reactor core to fly into the atmosphere releasing it across Ukraine. The Chernobyl 4 reactor was the reactor that was destroyed during the accident. (World Nuclear Association) It …show more content…
Cost, safety, impact on humans, or the impact on aquatic life, according to the website Conserve Energy Future “Eutrophication is another result of radioactive wastes” (Conserve Energy Future).This is when a body of water become enriched in dissolved nutrients this stimulates growth of aquatic plants, this usually results in the depletion of dissolved oxygen. (Merriam-Webster). People also criticize nuclear power because they are afraid that it could explode like a nuclear bomb, this is not possible, the fuel is not enriched enough to explode (Word Nuclear Association). The concern that nuclear power is not safe is a large one, however there is a large amount of evidence showing that this is not true, some of this evidence includes that far fewer people have died from nuclear power related accidents than any kind of fossil fuel. The biggest concern for nuclear power is the disposal of nuclear waste, there are multiple types of nuclear waste, these include very low level waste, low level waste, intermediate-level waste, and high level waste. These four classifications for nuclear waste are classified by the amount of radioactive material is in the waste, VLLW contains a level that is harmless while HLW contains levels that could be lethal, the kind of waste that is HLW includes used fuel cells and separate waste from reprocessing the used fuel. (World Nuclear Foundation). Disposal of the nuclear waste is paid for by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of TMI

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think we should keep TMI(Three Mile Island) because the positives outweigh the cons. In my opinion, keeping TMI would be a good idea because of the amount of energy it can produce. If they closed TMI then a lot of people would lose their jobs. TMI produces emission free energy unlike coal or other fuels. If TMI closes, then Pennsylvania's main source of energy would be coal or propane which is very bad for the air.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are benefits of nuclear power there are also an abundance of issues. These issues include the stability of the reactors, the rigorous process workers take to dispose of waste, the possibility that in the near future scientist will be able to redirect the fuel cycle into more nuclear weapons, and the cost to run these…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With its cheap cost to produce and provide electricity and it’s flawless safety record, the benefits of nuclear power definitely outweigh its risks. Secondly looking at the effects of nuclear power on the environment, nuclear power is cleaner than many forms of energy. According to ehow.com, the two main byproducts of generating nuclear power are water and radioactive waste used as fuel for the reactors. while this may sound bad, waste storage is not a huge issue. Much of the nuclear waste is able to be recycled into more fuel products, reducing the amount of waste actually needing…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear power is a better benefit to atmosphere and the world itself than coal. Nuclear power releases less greenhouse gases than coal making it environmentally friendly. For this reason we are better off choosing nuclear power rather than coal. Coal power plants are one of the biggest contributors to global warming. On the other hand nuclear power plants release little to no harmful gasses into the atmosphere.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • My topic is nuclear energy and my proposal is that the Unites States should utilize nuclear energy as the nation’s main power source. My research goals include finding statistics of refueling cycles and the reliability of nuclear, coal and gas power plants. In addition, I plan on finding what nuclear energy is and how it is produced. Furthermore, I need to understand the cost of building and running nuclear, coal and gas plants annually.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A&E Television Networks, Web. 30 Apr. 2017. This is an educational site with research information. In this accurate account of the events in Chernobyl from History.com, the author elaborates on the ordeal in Ukraine regarding the nuclear power plant and radiation, contributing to thirty two deaths and the contamination of much of the country, all due to the limited experience of the workers hired at the plant. The article provides practically all the details that surfaced during the catastrophe and detailed, truthful explanations to accompany the back-story and history of the event. From this article, I concluded that since nuclear energy is a relatively new technology, where scientists are not fully aware how to handle it, disastrous accidents are likely to happen like in this case in Ukraine.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Nuclear Energy Ferguson, Charles D. Nuclear Energy: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford UP, 2011. In this book Charles D. Ferguson, president of the Federation of American Scientists, writes about how nuclear energy is formed, the health risks it can cause, and the cost of nuclear energy plants. He gives the three sources to create nuclear energy: fission, fusion, and radioactive decay.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We should not build a nuclear reactor in Brooklyn due to the various dangerous effects it promotes. The reasons why we should not construct a nuclear reactor is that it’s expensive to build, the hazardous risks it produces towards human health, and the fact that it is not a clean energy source. Building a nuclear reactor requires excessive money that the government must provide. Its construction is extremely expensive because “Including Price Anderson limitations on nuclear liability, the federal subsidies reach $145.5 billion” (The Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power). Although, Patrick Moore stated that “It is in fact one of the least expensive energy sources” (Going Nuclear; A Green Makes the Case).…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear provide a small amount of energy to US. “the technology is very demanding … and political consequences of nuclear accidents are unpredictable” (Chesshire, 247).The radioactive waste is hard to get rid of and decomposed in a long time. For example, the Fukushima nuclear incident, during Japan’s earthquake of 2011, caused many people fear against nuclear power. “Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant—ground zero of the worst atomic meltdown since Chernobyl” (Beech). Nuclear rarely happen but when it does, it is really bad.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another plus of Nuclear energy is its footprint on the area of the earth is very small. Wind and solar take up quite a bit of area. Even though the wind turbine itself only takes up a small area, the land around it is pretty much useless except to let farm animals graze. Solar panels can use some useless space on top of buildings, but that doesn’t really amount to enough energy, so solar farms are built. A nuclear reactor can be the size of a semi truck, fit in a submarine, or the size of a house.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Power In America

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It can be produced very rapidly and generate a lot of revenue. Moreover, this energy can be reserved much easier than gasoline or coal. For example, some sources say that for nuclear power to produce energy it has to have a steam shaft which cost millions of dollars. However nuclear power is just uranium ores firing up steam and there is no burning. To put differently, since there is no burning it is easier to control, faster to generate, and doesn't require much space underground.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, nuclear power plants are more efficient than other fossil fuel power plants. Which in turn means that there are fewer natural resources being used to generate energy. Consequentially, there is less damage done to the natural environment to obtain the resources necessary to produce sufficient power. Cons: Some of the disadvantages of using nuclear power include, accidents have larger impacts, automatically a terrorist target, many operators have legal waivers in place, completely centralized, waste lasts a long time, and there are many unknown risks (Lombardo, 2015).…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fuel that is used to generate nuclear power is highly radioactive and had to be cautiously stored for years after use. A practical solution for waste management are still undergoing research. A possible leakage of the radioactive material could lead to a deadly disaster, releasing radioactive substances containing radioisotopes with long half-lives meaning that these isotopes stay in the atmosphere in some form or the other. These radiations can have a lasting effect on human life. There are two ways in which radioactive material harms the human body, it either kills cells in your body directly or it can cause mutation to a person’s DNA, and these mutations could lead to cancer and even birth defects if not repaired.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Low pollution, Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. Nuclear energy has one of the least effect on nature, since it doesn’t discharge any greenhouse gasses. Low operating cost, Nuclear power produces very inexpensive electricity. Since the cost of a nuclear reactor is anywhere between from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being used. Reliability, There has been an estimation that with the current rate of consumption of uranium, We may have enough uranium for 70-80 years.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Climate Nasa’s article on nuclear power, coal and gas are far more harmful to humans and the environment (http://climate.nasa.gov/news/903/) than nuclear power. Coal and fossil fuel burning emit harmful air-pollutants that have caused climate change and risked human life. In addition, replacing cheap energy resources with nuclear power plants can avoid tons of greenhouse…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays