The Neccesity Of Nuclear Energy By Bruno Comby

Improved Essays
Neccesity Of Nuclear Energy
In the text “Power and Energy, The Benefits of Nuclear Energy”, Bruno Comby (2008) mentions that the neccesity of nuclear energy. He says that we must use the more sustainable energy sources for our future. In his opinion, we have to utilize nuclear energy source more than the other energy sources for environment. He believes that nuclear energy is a clean, safe and dependable energy source. Nuclear power should be deployed rapidly to take the place of coal, oil and gas in the industrial places. I partly agree with the writer. I strongly believe that nuclear energy is neccessary energy source because the developing world needs more energy. Beside the nuclear energy, we also may
…show more content…
He claimed that wind and solar power occupy large areas but nuclear power implants are not very huge just like football stadium (Comby, 2008, para 16). He also said “They can make only a marginal contribution to the energy needs of a growing industrial civilation”. Yeah I partially agree with the writer but we should set up these energy sources more then nuclear. Using more renewable energy can lower the prices of and demand for natural gas and coal by increasing competition and diversifying our energy supplies. I also disagree with him about radiation. He said that there has been a radiation everywhere in nature since the earliest history of our planet. We know that the sun, planets and even universe contain radiation. “When life first appeared on Earth, the natural radiation levels were about twice as high as today. Most people are totally unaware of the fact that the human body itself is naturally radioactive”, Comby said that. This is true but one thing is wrong. That point is that What happen if we increase the radiation rapidly? As radiactive material decays, or breaks down, the energy released into the environment has two ways of harming a body that is exposed to it, Kathryn Higley said,director of the Oregon State University deparment of nuclear engineering and radiation health phsics. It is able to directly kill cels,or it can cause mutations to DNA. If those mutations are not repaired, the cell …show more content…
I believe that nuclear energy is very efficient for supplying electricity but I also strongly believe that renewable energy developed by us for our children’s future. I think that if we would like to live in this planet, we protect and save it for us. Day by day, people who awere of knowledge are increasing and they want to protect this planet. In my opinion,at the near future, there will be sustainable energy sources in everywhere but also nuclear power

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear power has a lot of benefits, especially towards the environment. For example, in Document A, it states that “nuclear power production releases no pollutants into the air.” Meaning that while the nuclear power plant is giving out energy for us, it’s not harming the environment. This is important because since it's not releasing any air pollutants, then its not releasing any greenhouse gasses, the earth’s temperature is going to decrease. It's a win win for both the humanity and Earth.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As research continues, newer and better technologies are invented. This new technology is being used in almost all aspects of life, from day-to-day life, research, military, medical and many other fields. One such technology is the development of nuclear power. Nuclear energy is “the energy held in the nucleus of an atom; it can be obtained through two types of reactions – fission and fusion”1. Recently nuclear energy has become more important because of its various uses and applications, its effects on the environment, and based on the church’s opinions and the opinions of the military and governments, nuclear energy is an important tool that humans should continue to research and develop, but only its non-violent applications.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear energy is the energy released during nuclear fission or fusion. Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which a heavy nucleus splits spontaneously or on impact with another particle, with the release of energy. Nuclear fusion on the contrary is the exact opposite; it gathers energy from the heavy nucleus combining with the shot particle. These two combined produce a lot of energy that is used all over the world on a daily basis. Nuclear power has proved to serve a huge part of our society today.…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bottom right picture illustrates a woman repowering her Nissan LEAF car with the help of nuclear energy. The authors tell us that nuclear power is becoming increasingly popular worldwide by stating, “Nuclear power is experiencing a worldwide rebirth,” and “electrification is expanding” (Stieglitz and Docksai 17-19). America needs to start funding nuclear power because it is quite…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He goes on to say that the use of nuclear energy has been decreasing over the last 10 years. He mentions that the United States alone shut down 4 plans in 2015. Unlike what many believe, increases in Solar and Wind farms are only able to compensate half of the energy lost globally by plants that were shut down. Shellenberger says “we're not in a clean energy revolution; we're in a clean energy crisis” (10:36). Frankly, he is correct in saying this.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student: Khalid Anwahi Rhetorical Analysis of Scholarly Essay The main argument in the article what role could nuclear power play in limiting climate change? by Robert Rosner and Alex Hearn is that nuclear power plays a great responsibility in hindering the change of weather. The authors point out that it is within the ability of the modern international technical in doing away with fuel produced from the coal firms in the world by the year 2100. They add that it would be more challenging to achieve this by the given time span. The article adds that the hindrances would entail negative public understanding in doing away with the final product of the used nuclear and the concept of security.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography: Nuclear Energy Ferguson, Charles D. Nuclear Energy: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford UP, 2011. In this book Charles D. Ferguson, president of the Federation of American Scientists, writes about how nuclear energy is formed, the health risks it can cause, and the cost of nuclear energy plants. He gives the three sources to create nuclear energy: fission, fusion, and radioactive decay.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear power is a better benefit to atmosphere and the world itself than coal. Nuclear power releases less greenhouse gases than coal making it environmentally friendly. For this reason we are better off choosing nuclear power rather than coal. Coal power plants are one of the biggest contributors to global warming. On the other hand nuclear power plants release little to no harmful gasses into the atmosphere.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I'm not trying to be pro-nuclear, I'm just pro-arithmetic” said David MacKay, while trying to explain that this was the only option at this point whether anyone liked it or not. The United States is on their toes trying to figure out the best routes to go to create energy: solar and wind, coal, or nuclear. Solar and wind are found to soon die out and have nothing left to support the United States. Coal is a resource which we are running low on and soon will not be able to find, then we have nuclear which can solve most of our problems without running out. The United States should use nuclear energy, because we can recycle warheads into energy, lower the amount of waste we create, and become more efficient.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It has been almost 70 years since the end of World War II. Today, nuclear power is used in everywhere, and it has become a very familiar thing to people. It is used in nuclear power plants, cancer treatments, radiocarbon dating for research and investigation purpose, and even in every household like smoke detectors. It has been contributing greatly to the modern society, and made people’s life better. However, its fast development is inseparable from the Manhattan Project in the World War II and the cruel results of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The documentary that was first shown in 2013 and is approximately 83 minutes long, does an excellent job of creating a debate about the perception of nuclear energy in challenging global climate change during the 21st century. This documentary film's main argument is that nuclear power, yet contradicted by many environmentalists, is a relatively safe and harmless source of energy if compared to other energy sources and can counteract…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear power comprises 20% of the world’s energy production. No other form of energy production runs the risk of being taken over by terrorists, or exploding and killing millions of people within a 50 mile radius (Nuclear Power Plants). The United States has 121 government sanctioned nuclear energy power plants in its borders that each cost extreme amounts to build and run. With the U.S. being nearly twenty trillion dollars in debt, it would be wise to stop all further development of nuclear energy.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays