He would make Odysseus’s men “his meal”(236) and kill all of them. Without Odysseus’s intervention, all of his men would have been slaughtered. His motive was just, as he was willing to fight a godlike creature in order to save his men. In this case, the violence was a critical part of Odysseus’s plan to escape. He was under pressure by the cyclops to make an immediate decision. As a result of his men being picked off, Odysseus had to blind Polyphemus to ensure that his men can escape. This shows the reader that Odysseus portrays the epic hero trait of being able to accomplish larger than life deeds. He was able to escape the habitat of an immortal being and still be cunning enough to injure him on his way out. In continuation, at his first opportunity, he could have killed Polyphemus as he went, “along his flank to stab him where the midriff holds the liver”(246). Instead, he prioritizes is crews escape because, “if [he] killed him [they] would perished there as well”(249). His intention was to escape with
He would make Odysseus’s men “his meal”(236) and kill all of them. Without Odysseus’s intervention, all of his men would have been slaughtered. His motive was just, as he was willing to fight a godlike creature in order to save his men. In this case, the violence was a critical part of Odysseus’s plan to escape. He was under pressure by the cyclops to make an immediate decision. As a result of his men being picked off, Odysseus had to blind Polyphemus to ensure that his men can escape. This shows the reader that Odysseus portrays the epic hero trait of being able to accomplish larger than life deeds. He was able to escape the habitat of an immortal being and still be cunning enough to injure him on his way out. In continuation, at his first opportunity, he could have killed Polyphemus as he went, “along his flank to stab him where the midriff holds the liver”(246). Instead, he prioritizes is crews escape because, “if [he] killed him [they] would perished there as well”(249). His intention was to escape with