Morality And Religion

Improved Essays
Morality Exists Independently from Religion
Historically, religion and morality have had an influence on each other. The influence of religion has led to the development of some aspects of morality. For example, many abolitionists were religious leaders. On the other hand, morality has had an influence on religion. For example, morality has influenced the Catholic Church’s role over women and abortion. While religion and morality may influence each other, is one necessary for the other? It is a common belief that religion is necessary for morality. This is the view that without religion, morality would not exist. However, after the examination of the arguments that support this view, it is clear that these arguments are problematic. It is therefore
…show more content…
However, how can we know what is right? Those who claim that morality is dependent on religion argue that without religion people would not know what is moral. In other words, religion is the reason why people know what is right and what is wrong. That is, without a religious source, humans could not figure out the nature of morality by themselves. However, this view is problematic. There are too many religions to know which is the right guide. There are a lot of possible sources of knowledge. Which faith is the right faith? Which religion has the right view of morality? Different religions do not always agree on points of morality. If religion is really necessary for moral guidance, there is now a problem trying to figure out which religion is the right religion. This is also known as the problem of moral guidance (Arthur,22). Since there are so many possible sources of knowledge, religion cannot be the only reason why people know what is …show more content…
The flaws in the opponents’ arguments contribute to this validation. It is clear that religious incentives are not the only reasons an individual acts morally. There are multiple types of incentives that motivate people to do what is right. On the other hand, knowing what is moral does not exclusively come from religion. There are so many religions, and therefore possible sources of knowledge. Identifying one source of knowledge becomes problematic. Finally, morality cannot depend on the commandments of God. If morality depended on the commandments of God, either morality is arbitrary or God’s command is irrelevant. After careful examination of the arguments supporting the view that religion is essential for morality, it is clear that morality can exist independently from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    That one needs evidence to prove that something exists and a lack of evidence against God not existing doesn’t prove that God does exist. According to this view God doesn’t exist and Dawkins proves it with logic. In sum then, the issue is whether his argument is valid or not valid. My own view is that Dawkins’ arguments that God doesn’t exist are strong, they have direct premises that back up his conclusion. Although some might object that God does exist based on their own beliefs through religion, I would reply that Dawkins provides a strong argument against God existence through his examples.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To reexamine the argument in favor, I would say that it is a valid argument, because if the premises are true then the conclusion would also logically be true. However, premise one is not completely true, due to the fact that there are people who do not believe in God. Agnostics and atheists would not hold true that acts are morally right if God commands them. The objection to the existence of God is a major reason why the Divine Command Theory is not able to fully support the argument. If God is not real, then He could not have created or interpreted morals.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Definition Essay

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the difference between moral and immoral actions and how do they differ? Psychologists and philosophers have debated for centuries about the meaning of mortality. Morality is however a word that is very difficult to connote and construe. How can we argue about a word if we don’t even know its definition? Morality is influenced by religion, beliefs and society, so shouldn’t the definition be an idea made due to your own religion and ideas and the background in which you grew up.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rationalism In Religion

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This does not seem like it would work, however they take from the “strong rationalists” the idea that there should be some evidence to help support what it is they believe, but that this does not go so far as to be 100 percent proof in their belief system. The “critical rationalist” take the opposite of “fideism” and say that it should be rational to argue and search religious beliefs. Is it rational to keep believing in a religious faith even when your peers are looking at the same evidence and finding a different answer? This can be rational when you are a “critical rationalist.” People around the world do not, or cannot have the time and or intelligence to fully understand and grapple…

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rorty explains all of this in his book Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality. Alternatively, in Perry’s book The Idea of Human Rights, he argues that human rights must involve religion to be intelligible. Rorty definitely has some valid ideas on the topic of human rights, but they seem to be good in theory and not necessarily in reality. Rorty identifies the biggest problem in our world to be that people do not respect human rights. The reasons for that being that people tend to identify others as not fully human, even subhuman, through tribalism, racism, and sexism.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is possible to prove that truth exists but belief is almost impossible. A belief can be explained in many different ways like the different religions do in explaining the existence of God, but truth can only be explained in only one way, what the proponents of this theory expect. The concept of God’s existence is a belief proposal and not a truth. A belief proposal is not a knowledge whereas a truth is based on the knowledge. When the proponents of the theory of conflicting truths argue against the existence of God, they seem to interpret it as a knowledge and not a belief proposal, and when they fail to find the knowledge to support the existence of God, then they discredit the same existence.…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He calls Russell’s view to be very confusing. Movraodes argues that if morality and religion were not tied together, why would people need to be moral then? Many people of selfish, so asking them to sacrifice something when they have nothing to motivate them to do good is something that just would not happen. Mavrodes also brings up that if you have religious ethics there is a stronger reason to be selfless when it comes to the concerns of others and with secular codes it is…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil. After taking issues into consideration the idea of God as the giver of morality can quickly be eliminated. You can be good without God or religion. It is natural for us to automatically tell the truth. When we were born, we did not come out with the urge to kill others or tell…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He makes a point that secularists have no right to comment on the relationship because their input is biased and “deep” in their eyes is “matter and energy, or perhaps natural law, chance or chaos” (Mavrodes, 194). Secular ethics doesn’t go deep enough into the idea of religion and morality to truly understand it, according to Mavrodes. Mavrodes’ opinion, is just that an opinion, where it is not constitituted as right or wrong, but gives an alternate view into the relationship between religion and…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is also important to learn about the Euthypro Problem that accompanies the theory because, without the problem, the person would not know why the theory leads to the conclusion that morality is not associated with the will of God. Lastly, it is vital to know that one can still believe in God even if morality is not handed down by Him, just like what St. Aquinas…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays