Theories Of Shared Knowledge

Improved Essays
Knowledge shapes and develops the world around. It is an essential tool used in everyday life. Knowledge allows the everyday person to do the simplest things like walking and talking. Society looks to knowledge to make since of the world around and the information acquired through one or a group. With reference of two Areas of Knowledge, science and religion, the discussion of how and in what ways shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge will be established in the Theory of Knowledge essay. In order for one to fully understand the way in which shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge in two areas of knowledge, one must look at knowledge as a whole and analyze both shared and personal knowledge, observed under the effects of both real …show more content…
Unlike personal knowledge, shared knowledge is just like its name states. It is the knowledge developed or acquired through or by a group of people, meaning two or more. This is the most common formality of knowledge. Meaning most individuals derive their knowledge through shared knowledge. For example in the science world a vast majority or theories are based off a collection of multiple scientist conclusions and theories. Over time the knowledge is passed down through many different scientist. Other than science groups there are family, religious, and political, just to name a few. When a particular person takes on the knowledge of a group of people whether it be for a religious, political, family, or even science group, they take on the viewpoint of the world or the majority. A key factor that makes shared knowledge what it is, is the working together of people over time. Science and religion are both areas of knowledge. Though two separate fields or areas, both areas coincide with one another one way or another. Where science or the science, both human and natural, focus more so on the empirical data of the world and religion focuses morality and the metaphysics of the world, they both draw a controversial line on the origin of the world and how it all came to be, otherwise known as …show more content…
Considering that majority of the work collected is based upon theories. When one elaborates on what a theory is, an idea to justify or explain why something is based on principles. An idea would impose that it is not at all a fact but an assumption, something someone just assumed. No one on this earth can attest to the origination of the earth, because they were not there to gather the evidence and facts. But it is by a collection of this assumption that makes the science community an invalid representation as to how shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge.an assumption, something someone just assumed. No one on this earth can attest to the origination of the earth, because they were not there to gather the evidence and facts. But it is by a collection of this assumption that makes the science community an invalid representation as to how shared knowledge can shape personal knowledge. Science groups have a hard time explaining life events and so therefore it would be unreliable. One’s personal knowledge would be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is why science cannot prove everything, because we do not know everything; scientist do not have all the answers they are simply guessing. When speaking of science, it is important to differentiate between observational science and historical science. Observational science is that which can be observed and tested…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since science deals with the physical world, but can it explain the bigger questions of life? There is no scientific formula that can determine whether or not we as humans were placed on the Earth for a specific reason. So instead we turn to metaphysics to answer these questions. Sovacool and Brown noted that we use myths as a coping mechanism for things that we don’t understand. Understanding the reason behind the myth gives important insights to our society.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the interviews, I asked the interviewees several questions about science and its relation to their religion. The first question I asked was “What is your definition of science?” Their responses, at the root, were all similar; stating that everything is essentially a derivative of science. Science is the study of how things work and come about, and it helps us to know and understand something’s purpose for existence through a series of observations and studies over time. Science affects our lives in many different ways, some of which we may not even realize at first glance. People use science to…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion human behaviour with its institution and systems of beliefs and practices. The subject Religion needs modern ways to study it to sense of this human behavioral phenomenon. The theories of Religious very in angle of the which the researcher can approach of Religion. The theories of Religion can try to the questions Religious history of mankind from origin. Although the origin and function…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science Vs Religion Essay

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Townes, 1966). Faith is essential to both science and religion. Faith is the foundation for religious opinion; however, scientists do not even realize they are utilizing faith as their foundation as well. For a scientist to begin searching, they must believe, or have faith, in their mind that there is a universal order, assuring their self of obtaining an understanding of this order in an attempt to find answers. Additionally, Townes compares the method of discovery between the two; further explaining both use great revelations.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries, people’s life have been based on religious beliefs until a new scientific window has taken its place for many people. Scientists have created a possible world of looking at things from a scientific window where they believe it is based on facts and evidence and religion is not. These two possibility of worlds of religion and science are related to Alison Gopnik’s essay, “Possible Worlds: Why Do Children Pretend?” Gopnik speaks of the possible worlds people create with their own mind and counterfactual thoughts. She studied children can think counterfactually of the past or future can create a possible world. Gopnik also notices that using causal knowledge is an attribution to creating possible worlds.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, they are equally baseless. Additionally, faith attitudes do not rely on empirical data from the natural world to be strengthened, so they have no business making claims of the natural world without evidence. A great number of people may personally believe in a young Earth creationist theory, but there is no definitive, objective source in the Bible to support this as the one true interpretation. Therefore, any scientific evidence against the young earth…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hypothesis is not an “educated guess”. It is much more than that. Scientists do not “guess”, they predict based off of past experiments and their own knowledge. If hypotheses were guesses, then experiments would not work and nothing would be learned from scientific observations and experiments. Many people confuse hypothesis, theory, and law.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, people can’t win arguments against God because they can’t disprove it. Thus, science and religion are incompatible, since they believe in different truths in the world; science more about the material world while religion focuses on the invisible…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion And Science Is Complement Each Other Introduction Science and religion are two entities that occupy an important position in the philosophy of science. The position of both branches of the discipline to give each other positive value in addressing the problems of life and humanity. It is caused by human nature as thinking beings who always want rationality. Humans are also experienced and witnessed to the problems associated with the dimensions of the mysteries in life that can not be solved except by reference to religion, so the existence of religions-which besides a belief system that requires the truth, as well as practical action against the application of trust (faith) who have recognized the truth through science methodology…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays