Importance Of Judicial System In Islam

Improved Essays
Assignment No. 2
Assignment’s Topic : Judicial System In Islam (Part 2)

The Independence Of The Judiciary : The laws of Islam , through it’s basic principles and sacred texts prohibits government officials from interfering in the matters of court and judges , they must respect respect their decisions inspite of becoming a hurdle for them . Islamic law in its individual statutes and general principles , tells us to realize its primary objective to establish justice on the basis of monotheism , it (monotheism) is not just lip service . It verifies the profession of faith realized through actions , the actions must contain what Allah has commanded and preventing from what Allah has prohibited
…show more content…
1- Muslims are totally responsible for what they do whether he or she and will get the punishment of committed crime as enforced by the state , this system is very necessary because it not only protects the society but if we receive punishment of the committed crime from the court of Shari’ah it will remove the afterlife punishment of that crime , Muslims must remember that Allah (swt) knows each and every of their actions . This is why it’s better to get punishment in the world and repent because the punishment of afterlife is much more severe than the world’s and that is hellfire . Many of the Muslims during Muhammad (peace be upon him) time confessed their crimes which were severely punishable and they knew it but they did so because they did not want to get the punishment of those crimes at The Day Of Judgement . It is narrated by Abu Daud that when a man confessed that he had committed an illegal sexual act and was ordered to be stoned to death The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upn him) said : “He is more agreeable than the fragrance of musk in the eyes of Allah” …show more content…
They never tried to turn the favour of court towards them or towards those whome they liked . Even if the decision of judiciary comes against them they accept it with due respect . The books of history are full with narrations showing that the judges appointed by the Rightly Guided Caliphs or by the later governors ruled against them . Some times Caliphs knew that what the truthful outcome would be or should be but even of that they allowed the cases to go to the court to set an example of conduct for us . They also do so to test the strength of the appointed judges while in such a situation when their adversary might be even a Jew or other non-Muslim . The judge in is court room was the most respected one , due to criticism he would not sway from the truth and he would treat whether it would be prince or a pauper equally . The books of history give many examples of as such .

Judge Must Be Respected In Society

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It will highlight the power comparison between the two government bodies. The High Court’s decision is the final say; therefore the examination of what would occur if the High Court found reasoning for a statute to be unconstitutional. Finally the misinterpretation of the unconstitutional statute…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harry L. Carrico Essay

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judges whom are selected should not be biased nor infringe on the rights of mankind (Gustitis,…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Analysis

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A New York State law created states all public schools were to open each day with the Pledge of Allegiance and a nondenominational prayer in which the students acknowledged their dependence upon God. Engel vs. Vitale was a case brought to the attention of the Supreme Court by ten concerned parents by minors who attended a public school in New York City. At the beginning of a school day lesson the following prayer, consisting of 22 words, ‘Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our country. Amen.’, was recited due to the approval of the New York state board of regents (state board of education) in 1951.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the Supreme Court’s power and legitimacy as a co-equal branch of government (McBride) and shed light on the importance of judicial…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States, the court system judicial authority is shared between the levels of government. Today, the Texas Constitution lacks power in people, campaign contributions, lack of minority representation on the bench, perceptions of fairness, and lack of knowledge on the part of the voters. Due to lack of these powers, people distrust the changes that could give the government even more power. Thought the states in United States, the Texas judiciary is among the most complicated and confusing systems. Courts are expected by the country to act in nonpolitical ways, focus on the wishes of the electorate, focus on justice, and give the fair and right judgment for the citizens.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the historic 1803 Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case, William Marbury filed suit and requested the Supreme Court to order James Madison to convey to Mr. Marbury the commission of justice of the peace for the District of Columbia. This was originally appointed to him by President John Adams prior to him leaving office. Mr. Marbury contended that while this appointment was never officially commissioned; it was, nonetheless, rightfully and legally his. While this case originated as a debate between two political parties regarding the legality of an appointment, the ruling by Justice John Marshall established a far greater and longer reaching precedent. In Justice Marshall’s ruling, he noted that while Marbury was entitled to the commission, that the Supreme Court did not have the authority to force Madison to deliver the commission.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, with so many opinions to take into consideration, it is extremely difficult to reach an agreement that the Bill’s “life” died somewhere along this process before even reaching the president’s desk. In fact, most of the Bills die in the committees! The process for policy change is better suited within an institution driven for positive change and trust. Some other challenges the legislative branch faces is the lack of trust in Congress as a whole.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a Muslim person did not follow these strict rules, he/she will deserve the extreme punishment in the other life that he/she as a Muslim believes in. This leads us to conclude that Islam is based on personal freedom or at least part of it. In Islam, I am the one who determine my fate to heaven or to hell. Thus, I am the only one who takes the responsibility of my actions. D’Holbach this free will is just an illusion.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of “checks and balances” is a policy implemented by our founders, which separates the three branches of government into the legislative, judicial and executive branches. The main purpose of this system is to ensure that the powers of the national government are separated from one another. The Legislative branch, composed of Congress is broken up into two chambers, the Senate and The House of Representatives. These two chambers are meant to have each state represented in them, of which officials were elected directly by the people in an open election.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Gerald Rosenberg, in his analysis on whether courts are powerful agents in achieving social change, highlights two main court views: The Dynamic Court view and the Constrained Court view. The Dynamic Court view holds that courts are successful agents in producing social change, while the constrained court view argues for the opposite (Rosenberg, 2). The American civil rights movement was an important demonstration in Rosenberg’s argument of the Constrained Court view (Rosenberg, 9). The Constrained court view maintains that courts cannot produce social change. In my response, I will deconstruct his court views to understand whether courts can produce significant social reform.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil law systems give their legislatures the power to make laws not to judges. Judges in this system makes their decisions based on legal codes, laws, and statues. Each case that a judge hears is treated as an individual incident without precedent. In the Islamic system the Qur’an, the Sunna, judicial consensus, and analogical reasoning are the basis for judges to make decisions (Vago,…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Religion And Law In Islam

    • 2137 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In today’s contemporary society religion and law are viewed as two distinct categories, which seem to never interconnect or even cross lines with one another. Religion is often regarded as a personal entity that has no effect on the community as a whole. This westernized view of religion is true to a certain extent— religion is a personal choice, but it is also a method of control. Religion, in this case, Islam, is crafted in such a way that satisfies the wellbeing of the individual, and along with the social and political structure of the society. Authority becomes rather firm and just when laws are derived from religion.…

    • 2137 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays