So that's wealth inequality. Income inequality is a factor which contributes to wealth inequality.
So, to start with, your idea that people who are at the very top of income earners are worth their pay is flawed. I'm not saying this from an ideological standpoint. The income of top earners has ballooned something like 400%, in real wages, since 1980, despite very little evidence that they are actually contributing to a company's growth. At the same time, real wages for middle-income workers have stagnated, increasing by only about 6%. That wouldn't seem so outrageous, but worker productivity has increased ~240% in that same time period. So people are working warder, for the same amount of money. The income from the productivity is going to
So, to start with, your idea that people who are at the very top of income earners are worth their pay is flawed. I'm not saying this from an ideological standpoint. The income of top earners has ballooned something like 400%, in real wages, since 1980, despite very little evidence that they are actually contributing to a company's growth. At the same time, real wages for middle-income workers have stagnated, increasing by only about 6%. That wouldn't seem so outrageous, but worker productivity has increased ~240% in that same time period. So people are working warder, for the same amount of money. The income from the productivity is going to