Importance Of Happiness In Fahrenheit 451

Good Essays
Happiness is something that is important in my life. I may not be happy all the time but I always try to make sure my family and friends are no matter what is happening. Happiness is one of the best emotions you can feel. It is an emotion that has no scientific definition it is just the feeling of joy and being content with how you are in your life. Happiness is important to me because it makes me feel motivated and like I can do anything I set my mind to. It is also important because of my family, wanting them to be happy even when it has been a terrible day for all of us.

The characters in Fahrenheit 451 are not happy. They might think they are happy but they are not, Mildred, Montag’s wife, tried to commit suicide and later in the story
…show more content…
I do not think it is right that they did this to the citizens. One of the Inalienable Rights is the pursuit of happiness. An Inalienable Right is something that can not be taken away from somebody and is something that you are born with. That is why it is terrible that the government is censoring things that could make them happy because it does not match their opinions. The government is burning books that they do not want the public to have because they might form their own opinions from the information they read. By doing this they make a lot of people unhappy because they want to read and learn more than they knew. In conclusion, the government should censor some things, like things that could hurt people or cause a mass panic, but not things that can make people happy like reading or writing stories just because it does not match their beliefs and/or opinions.

This is why happiness is important. It also shows why the government should not censor certain things from the public. It also shows that the characters in the novel are not happy because of the government and what they are hiding from them. Happiness is something everybody needs to survive, even if you think you do not need to be happy you do because it make it to where you can keep on moving and survive even if you do not want

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Just like when people believed that books held nothing important and only caused problems, Montag doubts the truthfulness behind this statement because he is reads books that contradict what the government says. He believes that information is being withheld from him, and history is being twisted and distorted to fit the will of the government. However, Montag still debates about speaking out against what he thinks is wrong and plays ignorant, in fear of what the government might do in order to keep people…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This keeps them from knowing that their society is being run completely wrong. Faber explains how the books have crucial information that people are being held from knowing. He says, Its not the books you need it 's some of the things that were once in books.” The second example is the censorship to blind people from seeing what 's wrong and doing what 's right. Faber then explains how he wanted to say that what the society was turning into was wrong, but then the government would hurt him or worse. Faber says, “ The right to carry out actions based on what we learn from books.” The third example of censorship in Montag 's society is the fast paced life censorship.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some times because it is beneficial for themselves or for others. People do not protect others by keep the truth from them, they actually end up hurting them more because they would have never expected that from that person. Many people expect the truth from everyone, but that is not how it works because sometimes speaking the truth can position someone in a dangerous situation. For example, what if the government was responsible for cancer, but didn 't want to let the people know because the earth is over crowded and there is limited space. If They release this information to the public it would create chaos all across the country.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Montag however does not see the book burnings as positive and reacts in the opposite manner "There must be something in books, things we can 't imagine”. Montag and Beatty are almost at the end of each side of the matter, with one arguing for books and one arguing against, but the general public would most likely be in between, taking the side of an authority figure which points the way. A large portion of the general public would be acting out of fear, and not hate of books "He 'll come in," said Mildred, "and burn us and the books!”, Mildred is the symbol for the general society as she acts in the same way. The different point of views from different characters outline the fact that everyone in a society will have a different reaction from what they see or…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Bradbury, “ We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought”(59). This was when Beatty was explaining how being a fireman is a very important job to Montag. They think that people that like and read books are people that want to be unhappy. Beatty is trying to say that books control the people and that they are a really bad influence in their actions and thoughts. This is not the case when to comes to knowledge in my opinion.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Religion Vs Constitution

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition, people wont apply it well because we are humans who still not perfect to act perfect. For example, politicians sometimes can lie in favor to reach the positions they have been aiming for. A wise man once said, “ Religion should not reach politics, it should only reach the politicians themselves ”. Politics have no religion, and when a secular person cries for separating the religion from politics because that this person does not want to see how politicians can use religion for their own goals. Moreover, these days’ people live in societies and hear immoral things about some religions, but should not religion be absolute right?…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is titled science fiction for a reason, it’s not real. So if it’s all made up, why do people feel the need to ban it? What everyone thinks nowadays is that if we can stop letting our children read foul things such as this, then they will grow up to be a better civilization. But what they are saying is wrong. If we ban books due to a few bad words or some “sensitive topics”, then our children will never grow up knowing right from wrong.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Effects Of Filibuster

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The filibuster ignored the democratic value of rule of law. This occurs because the filibuster impairs policy making which leads the government to be less responsive towards their voters and citizens. Due to this, the voters do not care about the political competition. This happens because the voters elect a representative to make changes that will benefit them, but if a filibuster occurs, the bill can get killed and no change would be made. This makes the voters angry with the political system and can lead them to stop caring about the political process.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is clearly depicted throughout the novel that in Iranian revolutionary society, the oppressive government imposes its traditional views upon its people and expects those views to be respected. However, these traditional views limit the amount of freedom people have to express themselves in public. As a result, the population takes the risk to rebel and lives with two identities, as can be seen through Marjane Satrapi and her friends’ actions: they obey the government to a certain degree in public, but at home they express themselves as they please. In other words, “[Their] behaviour in public and [their] behaviour in private [are] polar opposites” (151). Thus, even though they cannot act freely out in public, they are able to ‘be themselves’ as a form of rebellion when they are in private, as no one can see them or report them to authorities.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hopefully this paper doesn’t become censored or banned just like Fahrenheit 451. considering the fact we need to censor certain things and situations, doesn't mean we need to over do it and ruin certain things(thoughts or ideas) for people. Looking back on the history of Fahrenheit 451, it was very controversial for its content. People were becoming very easily offended by the language, the plot, and the character actions. Thus causing the book itself to be banned and censored. If you’re going to use censorship, don’t have it be too conservative.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays