Immanuel Kant's Duty Of Self-Knowledge

Improved Essays
The Duty of Self-Knowledge
Moral self-knowledge is a key to understanding the self. More importantly, the moral self is what benefits from moral self-knowledge. The benefits stem fromIt benefits due to knowledge which contributes to understanding one’s current mental state. This knowledge is not for evaluating ourselves but rather to decide what actions are right. “The value of self-knowledge does not lie in a determination of why I did what I did—whether or not the motive I ultimately acted on was pure” (O’Hagen #?). Our moral selvesf develops once we appreciate that value. Practical knowledge of ourselves through consistent observation of our actions leads to a better understanding of moral objectivity. Moral objectivity is an objective
…show more content…
Deontology is ethics in regardsrelating to duty, moral obligation and right action. The duty of moral self-knowledge is present in ?. The ability to know yourself is a pressing issue that moral agents accessible by abiding duty. Specifically, our inclinations to act are either good or evil. We are obligated to develop knowledge of ourselves. Is our morality in line with what Kant demands in the best interest for humanity as a whole? Kant is widely known for claiming that we cannot know our moral dispositions. At the same time, he is known to declare the first duty of the self from his Metaphysics of Morals is to “Know thyself”. These terms are contrary to one another and therefore must be reconciled. Owen Ware’s paper titled, “Duty of Self-Knowledge” is an exposition of this problem posed by Kant in his writings. Ware solves the puzzle of self-knowledge by reconciling both of Kant’s stated claims. I will reconstruct Ware’s argument detailing the duty of self-knowledge. Next, I will raise two objections to his argument. Also, I will consider a potential reply by Ware. Our moral dedication to understanding ourselves with knowledge is crucial to everyone and therefore, must be properly understood by all. The puzzle of self-knowledge could be solved by disciplining our motivations and maxims to choose actions that uphold duty which are in accordance with

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Erma Bombeck and Alexander’s works of literature produce thought on self-responsibility. They both present the reader with the idea that the key to knowledge is held by everyone; yet everyone must choose to use it. Even during high school we as people are presented choices. We decide whether we accept knowledge given to us or toss it aside and believe that it was “someone else’s problem”. People find that knowledge is hard to attain.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons for why one should be moral; that is, why one should act in a morally correct manner when dealing with others. This paper aims to go over two of the main arguments in favor of moral behavior. The first is presented by Socrates in Plato's text Why Should I Be Moral?, which argues that morality and justice are a key part of the soul, one for which man depends on to live a truly happy life. The second is presented by James Rachels in A Critique of Ethical Egoism, in which he argues that we must not treat others differently because there is no non arbitrary difference between others and ourselves.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Key Claims for Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands; Self-awareness of an action being morally incorrect reflects a reason why the person should commit it. Awareness creates justification for following through. (pp 64) The moral politician is considered someone that would be conscious of his bad actions, rather than believing all his actions are good. (pp 65) Rules function as a method to not only motivate people to act the best they possibly can, but to showcase what type of person that are if they do end up breaking them (i.e. feeling guilt or nothing at all).…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Duty

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant’s Classic Work Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals “outlines a rationalist ethical system centered in the notion of the categorical imperative as the fundamental principle of action” (Pojman and Tramel 218). The excerpt we read The Foundation of Ethics focuses on what gives an action moral worth, Kant argues that only if we act out of a sense of duty do we find a true sense of moral worth. I find this claim to be a very interesting one because I have never thought about how duty not in the sense that everyone thinks of duty but in the way that Kant defines it, gives us our sense of moral worth or moral credit for an action that is performed. I always look at it as we preformed based on the values that were instilled on us…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I premise that human beings are born morally neutral. Firstly, I support my argument using Aristotle’s view. Like Aristotle, I premise that human beings by nature desire to know because they were born with an empty mind. As a result, they are in pursuit of knowledge to get the sense of bad and good so that they can distinguish the moral deeds from the immoral acts. Secondly, I support my argument using Locke’s view.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An ethical dilemma is a problem in decision making involving two or more moral imperatives where neither of the options is acceptable unambiguously. The complexity arises because of a situational conflict where selection of one alternative would lead to transgression of the other option. Ethical dilemmas are invoked to refute a moral code or make improvements to it so that a solution can be achieved. Numerous ethical dilemmas are often debated upon from different perspectives with basis of such arguments being religious, moral, cultural and legal perspectives aside differing personal views.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays